Is the phonetic quality of unaccented words unpredictable? An example from spontaneous Finnish

Journal of the International Phonetic Association

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 127-138

  Lennes, Mietta ^a   Alarotu, Nina ^a   Vainio, Martii ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937337167     PISSN: 00251003     EISSN: 14753502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0025100301001104     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aylett, M. (1999). Modelling clarity change in spontaneous speech. In Baddeley, R. J., Hancock, P. J. B. & Földiák, P. (eds.), Information Theory and the Brain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Blumstein, S. E. & Stevens, K. N. (1980). Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in various vowel environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67, 648–662.
3. Boersma, P. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Available via http://www.praat.org/.
4. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics 18, 299–320.
5. Duez, D. (1995). On spontaneous French speech: aspects of the reduction and contextual assimilation of voiced stops. Journal of Phonetics 23, 407–427.
6. Fant, G. (1973). Speech Sounds and Features. London: MIT Press.
7. Greenberg, S. (1999). Speaking in shorthand: a syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation. Speech Communication 29, 159–176.
8. Hawkins, S. (1999). Reevaluating assumptions about speech perception: interactive and integrative theories. In Pickett, J. M. (ed.), The Acoustics of Speech Communication: Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology, 232–288. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Klatt, D. H. (1989). Review of selected models of speech perception. In Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process. 169–226. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Kunelius, S. (1998). Niinku-partikkeli keskustelussa. Master's thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
11. Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1–36.
12. Lindblom, B. (1990) Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H & H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Ogden, R. (2001). Turn-holding, turn-yielding and laryngeal activity in Finnish talk-in-interaction. In this issue.
14. Öhman, S. E. G. (2000). Oral culture in the 21st century: the case of speech processing. Keynote speech at the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Beijing, 16–20 October, 2000.