Studying secularism, practising secularism. Anthropological imperatives

Social Anthropology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 337-340

  Gellner, David N ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937337164     PISSN: 09640282     EISSN: 14698676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2001.tb00160.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Gellner, D. N. 1997. ‘For syncretism. The position of Buddhism in Nepal and Japan compared’, Social Anthropology 5: 277–91. Reissued in Gellner, The anthropology of Buddhism and Hinduism. Weberian themes, Delhi, 2000.
2. Gellner, D. N., Pfaff-Czarnecka, J. and Whelpton, J. 1997. (Eds.) Nationalism and ethnicity in a Hindu kingdom. The politics of culture in contemporary Nepal. Amsterdam: Harwood.
3. Hann, C. 2000. ‘Problems with the (de)privatisation of religion’, Anthropology Today 16: 14–20.
4. Kepel, G. 1994. The revenge of God. The resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity.
5. Madan, T. N. 1997. Modern myths, locked minds. Secularism and fundamentalism in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
6. Reader, I. 1991. Religion in contemporary Japan. London: Macmillan.
7. Stewart, C. and Shaw, R. 1994. (Eds.) Syncretism/anti-syncretism. The politics of religious synthesis. London: Routledge.
8. Van der Veer, P. 1994. Religious nationalism. Hindus and Muslims in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.