On Expressing Lexical Generalizations in HPSG

Nordic Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 161-217

  Meurers, W Detmar ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937336861     PISSN: 03325865     EISSN: 15024717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/033258601753358605     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ait-Kaci, H. 1984. A Lattice Theoretic Approach to Computation Based on a Calculus of Partially Ordered Type Structures. Ph.D. thesis. University of Pennsylvania, Philadel-phia, PA.
2. Bouma, G. Malouf, R. & Sag, I. A. 2001. Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory- 19(1), 1–65. ftp://csli-ftp.Stanford,edu/linguistics/sag/bms-nllt.ps.
3. Bresnan. J. 1982. Passive in Lexical Theory. In Bresnan, J. (ed.). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–86.
4. Briscoe, T. & Copestake. A. 1999. Lexical Rules in Constraint-based Grammars. Com-putational Linguistics 25(4), 487–526. http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~aac/papers/lr2-0.ps.gz.
5. Calcagno, M. 1995. Interpreting Lexical Rules. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Formal Grammar. Barcelona, http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/calcagno-fg95.html.
6. Calcagno, M. & Pollard, C. 1995. Lexical Rules in HPSG: What are they? Ms., dated 17 July 1995. Linguistics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus. OH. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/calcagno-pollard.html.
7. Carpenter, B. 1991. The Generative Power of Categorial Grammars and Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars with Lexical Rules. Computational Linguistics 17(3). 301 — 314.
8. Carpenter, B. 1992. The Logic of Typed Feature Structures - With Applications to Unification Grammars, Logic Programs and Constraint Resolution, vol. 32 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chomsky. N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
10. De Kuthy, K. & Meurers. W. D., 2001. On Partial Constituent Fronting in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3(3), 143–205. http://www.ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/dekuthy-meurers-jcglOl.html.
11. Dorre. J. 1994. Feature-Logik und Semiunifikation. No. 48 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340. Stuttgart: Universitat Stuttgart.
12. Flickinger. D. 1987. Lexical Rules in the Hierarchical Lexicon. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford University. Stanford. CA. Gazdar, G. Klein, E., Pullum, G. K. & Sag. I. A. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Geach, P. T. 1970. A Program for Syntax. Synthese 22, 483-497.
14. Gerdemann, D. 1995. Open and Closed World Types in NLP Systems. In Proceedings of the DGfS Fachtagung Computerlinguistik. DUsseldorf. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~dg/open_world.ps.
15. Gerdemann, D. & King, P. 1994. The Correct and Efficient Implementation of Appropriateness Specifications for Typed Feature Structures. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-94). Kyoto, pp. 956–960. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~dg/correct.ps.
16. Ginsberg, M. L. (ed.). 1987. Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
17. Gotz, T. 1994. A Normal Form for Typed Feature Structures. No. 40 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen. Published version of Master's thesis, Seminar fur Sprachwissenschaft, Universiat Tubingen, http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~tg/thesis.ps.gz.
18. Gotz, T. 2000. Feature Constraint Grammars. Ph D. thesis, Seminar fur Sprachwissen-schaft, Universitat Tubingen, Tubingen, http://w210.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/dbt/volltexte/2000/133.
19. Gotz, T. & Meurers, W. D. 1995. Compiling HPSG Type Constraints into Definite Clause Programs. In Proceedings of the 33nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Com-putational Linguistics (ACL 95). Cambridge, MA: MIT, pp. 85–91. http://ling.osu. edu/~dm/papers/ac195.html.
20. Gotz, T. & Meurers, W. D. 1997. The ConTroll System as Large Grammar Development Platform. In Proceedings of the Workshop “Computational Environments for Grammar Development and Linguistic Engineering (ENVGRAM)” held in conjunction with the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL and 8th Conference of the EACL. Madrid: Universi-dad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, pp. 38-45. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/envgram.html.
21. Gotz, T. & Meurers, W. D. 1997. Interleaving Universal Principles and Relational Constraints over Typed Feature Logic. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL and 8th Conference of the EACL. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, pp. 1–8. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/acl97.html.
22. Hinrichs, E. W., Meurers, W. D. & Nakazawa, T. (eds.), 1994, Partial-VP and Split-NP Topicalization in German - An HPSG Analysis and its Implementation. No. 58 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340. Tiibingen: Universitat Tubingen.
23. Hinrichs, E. W. & Nakazawa, T. 1989. Flipped Out: Aux in German. In Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL, pp. 193–202.
24. Hinrichs, E. W. & Nakazawa, T. 1994. Partial-VP and Split-NP Topicalization in German - An HPSG Analysis. In Hinrichs et al. (1994), pp. 1 —46.
25. Hohfeld, M. & Smolka, G. 1988. Definite Relations over Constraint Languages. LILOG technical report 53, IBM Deutschland. http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/Papers/abstracts/LR-53.html.
26. Hohle, T. N. 1978. Lexikalistische Sxntax. Die Aktiv-Passiv-Relation und andere Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen. No. 67 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
27. Hohle, T. N. 1983. Topologische Felder. Ms., Universitat Koln, Kdln.
28. Hohle, T. N. 1995. The Complement Extraction Lexical Rule and Variable Argument Raising. Handout for a talk given at the Int. HDSG Workshop 95, 21–23. June 1995, Universitat Tubingen, Tubingen.
29. Hohle, T. N. 1996. Einf. HPSG: Die Grammatik, Generalisierungen iibers Lexikon. Handout dated 18/19. April 1996, Deutsches Seminar, Universitat Tubingen. Tubingen.
30. Hohle, T. N. 1996. Remarks on the Word Principle. Handout dated 25 June 1996, Deutsches Seminar. Universitat Tubingen, Tubingen.
31. Johnson, M. 1988. Attribute-value Logic and the Theory of Grammar, vol. 16 of CSL1 Lecture Notes. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
32. Kepser, S. 1994. A Satisfiability Algorithm for a Logic for Typed Feature Structures. No. 60 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340. Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen. Published version of Master's thesis, Seminar fur Sprachwissenschaft, Universitat Tubingen, http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/sfb/reports/berichte/60/60abs.html.
33. King, P. J. 1989. A Logical Formalism for Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Ph.D. thesis. University of Manchester, Manchester.
34. King. P. J. 1992. Unification Grammars and Descriptive Formalisms. Lecture notes. Seminar fur Sprachwissenschaft, Universitat Tubingen.
35. King, P. J. 1994. An Expanded Logical Formalism for Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. No. 59 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340. Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/sfb/reports/berichte/59/59abs.html.
36. Lascarides. A., Briscoe, T., Asher, N. & Copestake, A. 1996. Order Independent and Persistent Typed Default Unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 19(1), 1–89. http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~aac/papers/landp.ps.gz and http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~alex/papers/pdu.ps.
37. Lascarides, A. & Copestake, A. 1999. Default Representation in Constraint-Based Frame-works. Computational Linguistics 25(1). 55–106. http://www-cs!i.stanford.eduraac/papers/yadu5-0.pdf and http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~alex/papers/yadu.ps.
38. McCarthy. J. & Hayes, P. 1969. Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. In Meltzer, B. & Michie, D. (eds.), Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Reprinted in Ginsberg (1987).
39. McDermott, D. 1981. Artificial Intelligence Meets Natural Stupidity. In Haugeland, J. (ed.). Mind Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 143–160. First appeared 1976 in SIGART Newsletter 57.
40. Meurers, W. D. 1994. On Implementing an HPSG Theory - Aspects of the Logical Architecture, the Formalization, and the Implementation of Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars. In Hinrichs et al. (1994), pp. 47–155. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/on-implementing.html.
41. Meurers, W. D. 1995. Towards a Semantics for Lexical Rules as used in HPSG. In Proceedings of the ACQUILEX II Workshop on the Formalisation and Use of Lexical Rules. Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–20. Also presented at the First Conference on Formal Grammar, Barcelona. 1995. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/dlrs.html.
42. Meurers, W. D. 1997. Usiithing Lexical Principles in HPSG to Generalize over Valence Properties. In Kruijff, G.-J. M., Morrill, G. V. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.). Proceedings of the Third Conference on Formal Grammar. Aix-en-Provence: Uni vers ite de Provence, pp. 137–146. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/using-Iexical-principles.html.
43. Meurers, W. D. 2000. Lexical Generalizations in the Syntax of German Non-Finite Constructions. No. 145 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340. Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen. Ph.D. thesis, Universiat Tubingen, http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/diss.html and http://w210.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/dbt/volltexte/2000/l18.
44. Meurers, W. D. & Minnen, G. 1997. A Computational Treatment of Lexical Rules in HPSG as Covariation in Lexical Entries. Computational Linguistics 23(4), 543–568. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/meurers-minnen-97.html.
45. Miller, P. H. & Sag, I. A. 1993. French Clitic Climbing Without Clitics or Climbing. Ms., University of Lille and Stanford University. A substantially revised version appeared as Miller and Sag (1997).
46. Miller, P. H. & Sag, I. A. 1997. French Clitic Movement Without Clitics or Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15(3), 573–639. ftp://csli-ftp.stanford.edu/linguistics/sag/french-clitic.ps.gz.
47. Monachesi. P. 1999. A Lexical Approach to Italian Cliticization. No. 84 in Lecture Notes series. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Published version of 1995 Ph.D. thesis. University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
48. Moshier, M. A. & Rounds, W. C. 1987. A Logic for Partially Specified Data Structures. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. Miinchen. pp. 156–167. Murray, K. S. 1995. Learning as Knowledge Integration. Ph.D. thesis. University of Texas, Austin, TX. Published as CS-TR-95-41. ftp://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/techreports/tr95-41.ps.Z.
49. Pollard, C. & Sag. I. A. 1987. Information-based Syntax end Semantics, Vol. I: Funda-mentals. No. 13 in CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
50. Pollard. C. & Sag. I. A. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
51. Richter, F. 1997. Die Satzstruktur des Deutschen und die Behandlung langer Abhangigkeiten in einer Linearisierungsgrammatik. Formale Grundlagen und Imple-mentierung in einem FIPSG-Fragment. In Hinrichs, E. W., Meurers, W. D., Richter, F., Sailer, M. & Winhart, H. (eds.), Ein HPSG-Fragment des Deutschen. Ted 1: Theorie. Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen, no. 95 in Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, pp. 13–187. http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/sfb-report-nr-95/kapitel2-richter.html.
52. Richter, F. 1999. RSRL for HPSG. In Kordoni, V. (ed.), Tubingen Studies in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen, Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 Nr. 132, pp. 74–115. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~fr/cards/rsrl4hpsg.html.
53. Richter, F. 2000. A Mathematical Formalism for Linguistic Theories with an Application in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, Seminar fur Sprachwissenschaft, Universitat Tubingen, Tubingen, http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~fr/cards/dissertation.html.
54. Richter. F., Sailer. M. & Penn, G. 1999. A Formal Interpretation of Relations and Quantification in HPSG. In Bouma, G., Hinrichs, E. W., Kruijff, G.-J. M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.). Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics. Stanford. CA: CSLI Publications.
55. Riehemann, S. 1993. Word Formation in Lexical Type Hierarchies: A Case Study of bar-Adjectives in German. Master's thesis. Universitat Tubingen, Tubingen. Published as SfS-Report 02–93. http://doors.stanford.edu/~sr/sfsreport.ps.
56. Rounds. W. C. & Kasper, R. T. 1986. A Complete Logical Calculus for Record Structures Representing Linguistic Information. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE Sym-posium on Logic in Computer Science, Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 38–43.
57. Sag, I. A. 1997. English Relative Clause Constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33(2), 431 — 484. ftp://csli-ftp.stanford.edu/linguistics/sag/rel-pap.ps.gz.
58. Smolka, G. 1988. A feature logic with subsorts. LILOG-Report 33, IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart. http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/Papers/abstracts/LR-33.html.
59. Van Noord, G. & Bouma, G. 1994. The Scope of Adjuncts and the Processing of Lexical Rules. In Proceedings of the /5th Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-94). Kyoto, pp. 250–256. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cmp-lg/9404011.