Restoration of deleted and assimilated consonant sequences in conversational French speech: Effects of preceding and following context

Journal of the International Phonetic Association

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 101-114

  Duez, Danielle ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937335667     PISSN: 00251003     EISSN: 14753502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0025100301001086     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aaronson, D. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: some qualitative observations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2(1), 42–55.
2. Ali, L., Gallagher, T., Goldstein, J. & Daniloff, R. (1971). Perception of coarticulated nasality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 538–540.
3. Bard, E. G., Shillcock, R. C. & Altmann, G. T. M. (1988). The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: effects of subsequent context. Perception and Psychophysics 44(5), 395–408.
4. Beddor, P. S., Krakow, R. A. & Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Perceptual constraints and phonological change: a study of nasal vowel height. Phonology Yearbook 3, 197–217.
5. Benguerel, A. P. & Adelman, S. (1975). Coarticulation of lip rounding and its perception. In Cohen, A. & Nooteboom, S. E. (eds.), Structure and Process in Speech Perception, 283–293. Berlin: Springer and Verlag.
6. Byrd, D. (1996). Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics 24, 209–244.
7. Cole, R. A. (1973). Listening for mispronunciations: a measure of what we hear during speech. Perception and Psychophysics 1, 153–156.
8. Cole, R. A. & Jakimik, J. (1978). Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64(1), 44–56.
9. Duez, D. (1995). On spontaneous French speech: aspects of the reduction and contextual assimilation of voiced plosives. Journal of Phonetics 23, 407–427.
10. Duez, D. (1998). Consonant sequences in spontaneous French speech. Sound Patterns of Spontaneous Speech, ESCA Workshop, La Baume-les-Aix, 63–68.
11. Foss, D. J. (1969). Decision process during sentence comprehension: effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 457–462.
12. Fujimura, O. (1962). Analysis of nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34, 1865–1875.
13. Grammont, M. (1914). Traité Pratique de Prononciation Française. Paris: Delagrave.
14. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition process and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 28(4), 267–283.
15. Grosjean, F. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: evidence and implications, Perception and Psychophysics 38(4), 299–310.
16. Lahiri, A. (1995). Undoing place assimilation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(3), 3333.
17. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H & H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, NATO ASI Series, vol. 55, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Lindblom, B. (1996). Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(3), 1683–1692.
19. Macallister, J. M. (1988). The use of context in auditory word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 44(1), 94–97.
20. Mann, V. A. & Repp, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on the perception of the (f)-(s) distinction. Perception and Psychophysics 28, 213–228.
21. Miller, J. (1986). Rate-dependent processing in speech perception. In Ellis, L. (ed.), Process in the Psychology of Language, 119–157. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
22. Morton, J. & Long, J. (1976). Effect of word transitional probability on phoneme identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15, 43–51.
23. Ohala, J. J. (1986). Phonological evidence for top-down processing in speech perception. In Perkell, J. & Klatt, D. (eds.), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, 386–397. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Ohala, J. J. & Feder, D. (1994). Listener's normalization of vowel quality is influenced by ‘restored’ consonantal context. Phonetica 51, 111–118.
25. Ohala, J. J., Riordan, C. J. & Kawasaki, H. (1978). The influence of consonant environment upon identification of transitionless vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64, S18, J9.
26. Pollack, I. & Pickett, J. M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language and Speech 6, 165–171.
27. Rubenstein, H. & Pollack, I. (1963). Word predictability and intelligibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2, 1947–1958.
28. Samuel, A. G. (1981). The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonetic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 7(5), 1124–1131.
29. Samuel, A. G. (1987). Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 36–56.
30. Vaissiére, J. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In Sundberg, J, Nord, L. & Carlson, R. (eds.), Music, Language and Brain, 108–120. Houndsmills: Macmillan.
31. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167, 393–395.
32. Warren, R. M. & Obusek, C. (1971). Speech perception and phonemic restorations. Perception and Psychophysics 9, 358–363.
33. Wheeldon, L. & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 356–381.
34. Wioland, F. (1991). Prononcer les mots dufrançais. Des sons et des rythmes. Hachette: Paris.