Deregulating endangered species protection

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 161-171

  Wilson, Patrick Impero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Deregulation; Endangered species act (ESA); Reauthorization; Species conservation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937332460     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089419201300000553     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bechtold, T. 1999. Listing the bull trout under the Endangered Species Act: The passive-aggressive strategy of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to prevent protecting warranted species. Public Land Resources Law Rev. 20:99-129.
2. Breyer, S. 1982. Regulation and its reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Brown, A. 1987. The politics of airline deregulation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
4. Clark, J. 1999. The ecosystem approach from a practical point of view. Conserv. Biol. 13: 679-681.
5. Com, M. 1998. Endangered species: Continuing controversy. CRS Issue Brief, IB 97046. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
6. Czech, B., and P. R. Krausman. 1998. Twelve faulty assumptions underlying the Endangered Species Act. Endangered Species Update 15:52-58.
7. Czech, B., and P. R. Krausman. 1999. Public opinion on endangered species conservation and policy. Society Nat. Resources 12:469-479.
8. Czech, B., P. R. Krausman, and R. Borkhataria. 1998. Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conserv. Biol. 12:1103-1112.
9. Easter-Pilcher, A. 1996. Implementing the Endangered Species Act: Assessing the listing of species as endangered or threatened. Bioscience 46:355-363.
10. Eisner, M. 1993. Regulatory politics in transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Harris, R., and S. Milkis. 1996. The politics of regulatory change: A tale of two agencies. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Horwitz, R. 1989. The irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Kostyack, J. 1997. Reshaping Habitat Conservation Plans for species recovery: An introduction of a series of articles on Habitat Conservation Plans. Environ. Law 27:755-765.
14. Kriz, M. 1997. Aiming for the green. Nat. J. 4 October:1958-1960.
15. Luoma, J. 1998. Habitat Conservation Plans: Compromise or capitulation. Audubon January-February:36-43.
16. Mann, C., and M. Plummer. 1995. Noah’s choice: The future of the Endangered Species Act. New York: Knopf.
17. Mitnick, B. 1980. The political economy of regulation: Creating, designing, and removing regulatory forms. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Noll, R., and B. Owen. 1983. The political economy of deregulation: Interest groups in the regulatory process. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
19. O’Laughlin, J., and P. Cook. 1995. Endangered Species Act at the crossroads: New directions from Idaho case studies. University of Idaho: Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group.
20. Plater, Z. 1997. The embattled social utilities of the Endangered Species Act: A Noah presumption and caution against putting gasmasks on the canaries in the coalmine. Environ. Law 27:845-876.
21. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. 1997. War of attrition: Sabotage of the Endangered Species Act by the Department of the Interior. Washington, DC.
22. Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1997. Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
23. Somach, S. 1994. What outrages me about the Endangered Species Act. Environ. Law 24: 801-813.
24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000a. Endangered species habitat conservation planning: HCP overview. 14 January 2000.
25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000b. Habitat Conservation Plan (no surprises) assurances final rule. 14 January 2000.
26. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1994. Endangered Species Act: Information on species protection and nonfederal lands. GAO/RCED-95-16. Washington, DC.
27. Viederman, S. 1994. Public policy: Challenges to ecological economics. In Investing in natural capital: The ecological economics approach to sustainability, eds. A. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke, and R. Costanza, 467-478. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28. Weber, E. 1998. Pluralism by the rules: Conflict and cooperation in environmental regulation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29. Yaffee, S. 1997. Why environmental policy nightmares recur. Conserv. Biol. 11:328-337.