Respect for persons

Australian Social Work

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 55-61

  Gray, Mel ^a,b   Stofberg, J A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Ethics; Goodness; Remorse; Respect; Sensibility; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937331494     PISSN: 0312407X     EISSN: 14470748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03124070008414316     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bailey, R. B., and Brake, M., eds. 1975. Radical social work, London: Edward Arnold.
2. Bernauer, J. W., and Mahon, M., 1994. “ The ethics of Foucault. ”. In The Cambridge companion to Foucault Edited by: Gary, Gutting.
3. Biestek, F. P., and Gehrig, C. C., 1978. Client self-determination in social work: A fifty year history, Chicago: Loyola Press.
4. Biklen, D. P., 1983. Community organising: Theory and practice, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Cilliers, P., 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6. Clark, C. L., and Asquith, S., 1985. Social work and social philosophy: A guide to practice, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7. Corrigan, P., and Leonard, P., 1978. Social work practice under capitalism: A Marxist appivach, London: MacMillan.
8. Franklin, D. L., 1990. The cycles of social work practice: Social action vs. individual interest’. Journal of Progressive Human Services, Vol. 1 (No. 2): 59–80.
9. Franklin, D. L., 1986. ‘Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From moral certainty to rational inquiry in social work practice’. Social Service Review, Vol. 60 (No. 4): 504–525.
10. Gaita, R., 1991. Good and evil: An absolute conception, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
11. Galper, J., 1980. Social work practice: A radical approach, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
12. Goldstein, H., 1973. Social work practice: A unitary approach, Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
13. Goldstein, H., 1986.)‘Towards the integration of theory and practice: A humanistic approach’. Social Work, Vol. 31 (No. 5): 352–357.
14. Goldstein, H., 1990. ‘The knowledge base of social work practice: Theory, wisdom, analogue, or art?’. families in Society, Vol. 71 (No. 1): 3243
15. Grassian, V., 1981. Moral reasoning, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
16. Gray, M., 1993. The relationship between social work, ethics and politics, Unpublished doctoral thesis Durban: University of Natal.
17. Gray, M., 1995. The ethical implications of current theoretical developments in social work’. British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 25 (No. 1): 55–70.
18. Hamilton, R., 1976. ‘Social work: An aspiring profession and its difficulties’. British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 4 (No. 3): 332–341.
19. Murdoch, I., 1970. The sovereignty of good., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20. Rhodes, M. L., 1986. Ethical dilemmas in social work, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
21. Spicker, P., 1990. ‘Social work and self-determination’. British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 20 (No. 3): 221–236.
22. Strawson, P. F., 1974. freedom end resentment and other essays, London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
23. Timms, N., 1983. Social work values: An enquiry, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
24. Wilkes, R., 1981. Social work with undervalued groups, London: Tavistock.
25. Woodroofe, K., 1962. From charity to social work, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.