Sharing genetic origins information in third party assisted conception: A case for victorian family values?

Children and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 11-22

  Blyth, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937325603     PISSN: 09510605     EISSN: 10990860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00147.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blyth, E and Hunt, J (1998) ‘Donor assisted conception and information for donor offspring in the UK: a survey of licensed centres’ views on HFEA Donor Information Form (91) 4’, Human Reproduction, 13, 11, 3274–3277
2. Blyth, E, Crawshaw, M and Speirs, J eds (1998) Truth and the Child Ten Years On: Information Exchange in Donor Assisted Conception. British Association of Social Workers
3. Clarke, K (1990) House of Commons Debates. 20 June, cols. 1004–1005
4. Cook, R and others (1995) ‘Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65, 4, 549–559
5. Department of Health and Social Security (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. HMSO (Warnock Report), Cmnd. 9314
6. Department of Health and Social Security (1987) Human Fertilisation and Embryology: a Framework for Legislation. HMSO, Cm. 259
7. Donor Conception Support Group of Australia Inc. (1997) Let the Offspring Speak: Discussions on Donor Conception. New South Wales: Donor Conception Support Group of Australia Inc.
8. Gregoire, A and Mayer, R (1965) ‘The impregnators’, Fertility and Sterility, 16, 1, 130–134
9. Home Office (1998) Supporting Families: A Consultation Document. London: Home Office
10. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1994) Donor Information Form (HFEA Register (91)4). London: HFEA
11. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1998) Code of Practice, Fourth edn. London: HFEA
12. International Federation of Fertility Societies (1998) IFFS International Consensus. Montpellier: IFFS
13. Johnson, M (1997) ‘Payment to gamete donors: position of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’, Human Reproduction, 12, 9, 1839–1842
14. Jonsson, L (1988) ‘Artificial Insemination in Sweden, in Gouvernement du Québec’, Sortir la Maternité du Laboratoire. Québec: Conseil du Statut de la femme
15. King’s Fund Centre (1991) Counselling for Regulated Infertility Treatments: the Report of the Counselling Committee. King’s Fund Centre
16. Merricks, W (1998) ‘Is it ethical?’ DI Network Newsletter, 11, May, p. 4
17. Pennings, G (1997) ‘The “double track” policy for donor anonymity’, Human Reproduction, 12, 12, 2839–2844
18. Purdie, A and others (1992) ‘Identifiable semen donors—attitudes of donors and recipient couples’, New Zealand Medical Journal, 105, 27–28
19. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1987) Donor Insemination Leaflet. London: RCOG.
20. Shenfield, F (1999) ‘Anonymity: the case for’, Progress in Reproduction, 3, 1, p. 8
21. Shenfield, F and Steele, S (1997) ‘What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation?’, Human Reproduction, 12, 2, 392–395
22. Sverne, T (1983) Children Conceived by Artificial Insemination: Summary of a report of the Insemination Committee. SOU, 42, pp. 1–19
23. Wavell, S (1997) ‘A donor father’s sins of omission’, The Sunday Times News Review, 6 July, p. 6.