From communism to civil society? The arts and the nonprofit sector in central and eastern europe

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 7-18

  Toepler, Stefan ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937324789     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19307799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632920009599568     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amestad, G. 1995. The cultural responsibility of the state—From the point of view of the Baltic Sea states. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Cultural Affairs.
2. Boorsma, P. 1997. Privatization/désétatisation and culture: Limitations or opportunities for cultural development in Europe. In Privatization/désétatisation and culture. Edited by A. van Hemel and N. van der Welen, 9-12. Amsterdam: Boekman Foundation/Twente University.
3. Brooks, J. 1994. Socialist realism in Pravda: Read all about it! Slavic Review 53(4): 973-991.
4. Dahrendorf, R. 1990. Reflections on the revolution in Europe—in a letter intended to have been sent to a Gentleman in Warsaw. New York: Times Books.
5. Frič, P., Deverová, L., Pajas, P., and Šilhanová, H 1998. Defining the nonprofit sector: The Czech Republic. Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project Working Paper No. 27. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
6. Goldfarb Marquis, A. 1995. Art lessons: Learning from the rise and fall of public arts funding. New York: Basic Books.
7. Havel, V., Klaus, V., and Pithart, P. 1996. Rival visions. Journal of Democracy 7(1): 12-23.
8. Hi liman-Chartrand, H., and McCaughey, C. 1989. The arm’s length principle and the arts: An international perspective—past, present and future. Who's to pay for the arts? The international search for models of support. Edited by M. C. Cummings and J. M. D. Schuster. New York: AC A Books.
9. Ilczuk, D. 1998. Cultural policy in Latvia. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation.
10. Katz, S. 1997. Nonprofit cultural organizations in Russia: In search for a model for survival. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of ARNOVA, 4-6 December, Indianapolis.
11. Kramer, R. 1981. Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Kurkela, Vesa. 1997. Music Media in the Eastern Balkans; Privatised, Deregulated, and Neo- Traditional. European Journal of Cultural Policy, 3(2): 177-205.
13. Kuti, É. 1996. The nonprofit sector in Hungary. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
14. Kuti, É, 1997. Kulturális célú nonprofit szervezetek (Nonprofit Organizations in the Field of Culture). Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.
15. Lazear, E. P., and Rosen, S. 1995. Publicly provided goods and services in a transition economy. In Economic transition in Eastern Europe and Russia. Edited by E. P. Lazear. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
16. Muschter, G. 1993. Künstlerförderung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Kulturförderung: Mehrals Sponsoring. Edited by R. Strachwitz and S. Toepler, 35-40. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
17. Novotny, O. 1995. Key issues in the transformation of culture in the post-socialist countries: With particular reference to the Slovak Republic. European Journal of Cultural Policy 1(2): 217-223.
18. Rueschemeyer, M. 1993. State patronage in the German Democratic Republic: Artistic and political change in a state socialist society. In Paying the piper: Causes and consequences of art patronage. Edited by J. H. Balfe, 209-233. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
19. Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. 1997. Toward a common classification. In Defining the nonprofit sector; A cross-national analysis; Edited by L, M. Salamon and H. K. Anheier, 51-100. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20. Salamon, L., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., and Sokolowski, S. W. 1999. Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
21. Schuster, J. M. 1997. Deconstructing a Tower of Babel: Privatisation, decentralisation and devolution as ideas in good currency in cultural policy. Voluntas 8(3): 261-282.
22. Siegel, D., and Yancey, J. 1992. The rebirth of civil society: The development of the nonprofit sector in East Central Europe and the role of western assistance. New York: Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
23. Simon, K. 1995. Privatization of social and cultural services in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparative experiences. Boston University International Law Journal 13(2): 383-393.
24. Smithuijsen, C. 1997. European countries reflect on privatization, désétatisation, and culture: Introduction to the country reports. In Privatization/désétatisation and culture. Edited by A. van Hemel and N. van der Welen, 91-97. Amsterdam: Boekman Foundation/Twente University.
25. Sokolowski, S. W. 1998. Innovation, professional interests, and nonprofit organizations: The case of health care in Poland. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 8(4): 363-385.
26. Sokolowski, S. W. (in press). Civil society and the professions in Eastern Europe: Social change and organizational innovation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
27. Toepler, S., and Zimmer, A. 1997. The state and the non-profit sector in the provision of arts and culture: The cases of Germany and the United States. European Journal of Cultural Policy 3(2): 289-304.
28. van Hemel, A., and N. van der Welen, eds. 1997. Privatization/désétatisation and culture. Conference reader for the Circle Round Table 1997. Amsterdam: Boekman Foundation/Twente University.
29. Zimmer, A., Priller, E., and Anheier, H. 1997. Der Nonprofit-Sektor in den neuen Bundesländern: Kontinuität, Neuanfang oder Kopie? Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Untemehmen 20(1): 58-76.
30. Zimmer, A., and Toepler, S. 1999. The subsidized muse: Government and the arts in Western Europe and the United States. Journal of Cultural Economics 23(1): 33-49.