Justifying deception in social science research

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 151-166

  Clarke, Steve ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937323859     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00117     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Psychological Association (1992) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, American Psychologist, 47, pp. 1597-1611.
2. A. J. Kimmel (1996) Ethical Issues in Behavioural Research (Cambridge MA, Blackwell) pp. 325-346.
3. S. Milgram (1974) Obedience to Authority (New York, Harper and Row).
4. D. Bramel (1962) A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, pp. 121-9.
5. A. E. Bergin (1962) The effect of dissonant persuasive communications upon changes in a self-referring attitude, Journal of Personality, 30, pp. 423-36.
6. H. A. Murray (1938) Explorations in Personality (New York, Oxford University Press).
7. A. E. Gross and I. Fleming (1982) Twenty years of deception in social psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, pp. 402-8.
8. Kemmel (1982) Twenty years of deception in social psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, pp. 75-82
9. C. R. Pigden and G. R. Gillett (1996) Milgram, method and morality, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 13, pp. 233-250
10. S. Milgram (1977) The Individual in a Social World (Reading Ma, Addison-Wesley), p. 14.
11. A. C. Elms (1982) Keeping deception honest, in T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace and L. Walters, eds., Ethical Issues in Social Science Research (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press), p. 237.
12. E. Walster, E. Berscheid, D. Abrahams and V. Aronson (1967) Effectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, pp. 371-80.
13. F. Tesch (1977) Debriefing research participants: though this be method there is a madness to it, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, p. 217-24.
14. R. R. Faden and T. L. Beauchamp (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York, Oxford University Press).
15. T. L. Beauchamp and J. E. Childress (1983) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Second Edition) (New York, Oxford University Press), pp. 59-61.
16. A. Capron (1974) Informed consent in catastrophic disease and treatment, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 123, pp. 364-76.
17. R. Macklin (1982) Keeping deception honest, in T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace and L. Walters eds., University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 123, pp. 193-218.
18. M. Wax (1977) Fieldwork and research subjects: who needs protection?, Hastings Center Report, 7, pp. 29-32.
19. F. D'Agostino (1995) The ethics of social science research, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12, pp. 65-76
20. G. Dworkin (1982) Must subjects be objects? In T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace and L. Walters, eds., Journal of Applied Philosophy, pp. 246-254
21. D. Baumrind (1978) Nature and definition of informed consent in research involving deception, in National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, DHEW Publication no. (OS) 78-0014 (Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office), Appendix, vol. 2, pp. 23-42
22. E. Diener and R. Crandall (1978) Ethics in Social and Behavioural Research (Chicago, Chicago University Press), p. 46.
23. C. A. J. Coady (1992) Testimony (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
24. D. Hume (1957) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (New York, Oxford University Press), s. 88.
25. D. Cocking and J. Oakley (1994) Medical experimentation, informed consent and using people, Bioethics 8, pp. 293-311