Agenda setting and problem definition

Policy Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 37-47

  Dery, David ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937322627     PISSN: 01442872     EISSN: 14701006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014428700114008     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ANDERSON, J. E., ed. 1976. Cases in Public Policy-Making, New York: Praeger.
2. ARGYRIS, C., 1977. Double-Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct.: 115–25.
3. ARGYRIS, C., and SCHON, D. A., 1996. Organizational Learning II, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
4. BARDACH, E., 1996. The Eight-Step Path of Policy Analysis, Berkeley: Berkeley Academic Press.
5. BAUMGARTNER, F. R., and JONES, B. D., 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6. BENNIS, W., 1966. Changing Organizations, New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. BlRKLAND, T. A., 1997. After Disaster Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. BREWER, G. D., and DELEON, P., 1983. The Foundations of Policy Analysis, Homewood, I11.: Dorsey.
9. COBB, R. W., and ELDER, C. D., 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. COBB, R. W., and Ross, M. H., 1997. “ 'Agenda Setting and the Denial of Agenda Access: Key Concepts' ”. In Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial, Edited by: R. W. and Cobb, M. H., Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
11. DERY, D., 1984a. Problem Definition in Policy Analysis, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
12. DERY, D., 1984b. Evaluation and Termination in the Policy Cycle. Policy Sciences, 17: 13–26.
13. DERY, D., and SCHWARTZ-MlLNER, B., 1994. Who Governs Local Government?, TelAviv: Hakibutz Hameuchad. (in Hebrew)
14. DEUTSCH, K. W., 1975. “ On the Learning Capacity of Large Political Systems ”. In Information for Action, Edited by: Kochen, M., 61–83. New York: Academic Press.
15. DUNN, W. N., 1988. Methods of the Second Type: Coping with the Wilderness of Conventional Policy Analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 7 (4) summer: 720–37. 1988
16. FRIEDMAN, R., November 1988. Survey of Young Couples Who Married During 1986-1988, November, Ministry of Housing and Construction. 1988 (in Hebrew)
17. GAYER, D., June 1991. Assessment of the Changes in the Scoring System for Young Couples, June, Ministry of Housing and Construction. 1991 (In Hebrew)
18. GUSFIELD, J., 1981. The Culture of Public Problems, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. HEDBERG, B., 1981. “ How Organizations Learn and Unlearn ”. In Handbook of Organizational Design, Edited by: Nystrom, P. C., and Starbuck, W. H., vol. 1, New York: Oxford University Press.
20. HlRSCHMAN, A. O., 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyally, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
21. HlRSCHMAN, A. O., 1992. Rival Views of Market Society, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
22. HlRSCHMAN, A. O., 1995. A Propensity to Self-Subversion, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
23. KlNGDON, J. W., 1984. Agendas Alternatives and Public Policy, Boston: Little, Brown.
24. LANDAU, M., 1973. On the Concept of a Self-Correcting Organization. Public Administration Review, 33 (6): 533–42. 1973
25. LINDBLOM, C. E., and COHEN, D. K., 1979. Usable Knowledge, New Haven: Yale University Press.
26. LIPSKY, M., 1968. Protest as a Political Resource. American Political Science Review, 62 December: 1144–58. 1968
27. LIPSKY, M., 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28. McCIAIN, P. D., 1990. Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Minority Group Influence. Policy Studies Review, 9 (2) Winter 1990
29. MAJONE, G., 1980. Policies as Theories. Omega, 8 (2): 151–62. 1980
30. MAJONE, G., 1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven: Yale University Press.
31. MARKEN, R. S., 1990. A Science of Purpose. American Behavioral Scientist, 34 (1) Sept-Oct: 6–13. 1990
32. MAY, J. V., and WILDAVSKY, A., eds. 1978. The Policy Cycle, Beverly Hills: Sage.
33. NAKAMURA, R. T., and SMALLWOOD, F., 1980. The Politics of Policy Implementation, New York: St. Martin's Press.
34. OLSON, M., 1965. The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
35. POLSBY, N., 1984. Political Innovation in America, New Haven: Yale University Press.
36. PRESSMAN, J. L., and WILDAVSKY, A., 1984. Implementation, 3rd edition, Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. REICH, R. B., ed. 1988. The Power of Public Ideas, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
38. REIN, M., and SCHON, D. H., 1977. “ Problem-Setting in Policy Research ”. In Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, Edited by: Weiss, C. H., 235–50. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
39. ROCHEFORT, D. A., and COBB, R. W., eds. 1994. The Politics of Problem Definition, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
40. STEINBRUNER, J. D., 1974. The Cybernetic Theory of Decision, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. SCHON, D. A., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner, New York: Basic Books.
42. STONE, D. A., 1988. Policy, Paradox and Political Reason, New York: HarperCollins.
43. WEICK, K. E., 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
44. WEISS, J. A., 1989. The Powers of Problem Definition: The Case of Government Paperwork. Policy Sciences, 22: 97–121.
45. WILDAVSKY, A., 1979. Speaking Truth to Power The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, London: Macmillan.
46. WOLSFELD, G., 1984. Collective Political Action and Media Strategy: The Case Of Yamit. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28 (1984): 1–36.
47. WOLSFELD, G., 1988. The Politics of Provocation: Participation and Protest in Israel, New York: State University of New York Press.