Can Neuropsychological Evidence Inform Connectionist Modelling? Analyses of Spelling

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 1995, Pages 195-225

  Shallice, Tim ^a   Glasspool, David W ^a   Houghton, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937299301     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690969508407094     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alegria, J., & Mousty, P. (1994). On the development of lexical and non-lexical spelling procedures of French-speaking, normal and disabled children. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention, pp. 211–226. Chichester: John Wiley.
2. Amit, D.J., Sagi, D., & Usher, M. (1990). Architecture of attractor neural networks performing cognitive fast scanning. Network, 1, 189-216.
3. Barry, C., & Seymour, P.H.K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in non word spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 5–40.
4. Beauvois, M.F., & Derouesne, J. (1981). Lexical or orthographic agraphia. Brain, 104, 21-49.
5. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R.S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the connection between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
6. Burgess, N. (1995). A solvable connectionist model of immediate recall of ordered lists. In G. Tesauro, D. Touretzky, & J. Alspector (Eds), Neural information processing systems 7. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
7. Burgess, N., & Hitch, J.G. (1992). Towards a network model of the articulatory loop. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 429-460.
8. Burton, M., Young, A.W., Bruce, V., Johnston, R.A., & Ellis, A.W. (1991). Understanding covert recognition. Cognition, 39, 129-166.
9. Butterworth, B. (1989). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261-286.
10. Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain and Cognition, 5, 41-66.
11. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297.
12. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Silveri, M.C., & Laudanna, A. (1985). Reading mechanisms and the organisation of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 81-114.
13. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59-85.
14. Coltheart, M„ Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Hallar, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
15. Cooper, R., Shallice, T., & Farringdon, J. (1995). Symbolic and continuous processes in the automatic selection of actions. In J. Hallam (Ed.), Hybrid problems, hybrid solutions. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
16. Ellis, A.W., & Young, A.W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
17. Elman, J.L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
18. Farah, M J., O'Reilly, R.C., & Vecera, S.P. (1993). Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of lesioned neural networks. Psychological Review, 100, 571-588.
19. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.
20. Glasspool, D.W. (1991). Competitive queuing and the articulatory loop: An extended network model. MSc thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Manchester.
21. Goswami, U. (1988). Children's use of analogy in learning to spell. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 6, 21-33.
22. Grossberg, S. (1978). Behavioural contrast in short-term memory: Serial binary memory models or parallel continuous models? Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 199-219.
23. Harley, T.A., & MacAndrew, S.B.G. (1992). Modelling paraphasias in normal and aphasic speech. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 378–383. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
24. Hartley, T., & Houghton, G. (in press). A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language.
25. Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1989). The graphemic buffer and attentional mechanisms. Brain and Language, 36, 208-235.
26. Hinton, G.E., & Plaut, D.C. (1987). Using fast weights to deblur old memories. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 177–186. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27. Hinton, G.E., & Shallice T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95.
28. Hockley, W.E. (1984). Analysis of response time distribution in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 598–615.
29. Houghton, G. (1990). The problem of serial order. A neural model of sequence learning and recall. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds), Current research in natural language generation. London: Academic Press.
30. Houghton, G. (1994). Some formal variations on the theme of competitive queueing. Internal Technical Report UCL-PSY-CQ1, Department of Psychology, University College London.
31. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language, London: Academic Press.
32. Houghton, G., Glasspool, D., Shallice, T. (1994). Spelling and serial recall: Insights from a competitive queueing model. In G.D.A. Brown 8c N.C. Ellis (Eds), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention, pp. 365–404. Chichester John Wiley.
33. Jonsdottir, M., Shallice, T., & Wise, R. (in press). Language-specific differences in graphemic buffer disorder. Cognition.
34. Jordan, M. (1986). Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 10–17. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
35. Katz, R. (1991). Limited retention of information in the graphemic buffer. Cortex, 27, 111–119.
36. Kay, J., & Hanley, R. (1994). Peripheral disorders of spelling: The role of the graphemic buffer. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention, pp. 295–315. Chichester: John Wiley.
37. Kupferman, I. (1979). Modulatory actions of neurotransmitters. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2, 447-465.
38. W.J.M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A.S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Levelt Review, 98, 122 - 142.
39. Lhermitte, F., & Beauvois, M.F. (1973). A visual speech disconnection syndrome: Report of a case with optic aphasia, agnosic alexia and colour agnosia. Brain, 96, 695-714.
40. Link, K., & Caramazza, A. (1994). Orthographic structure and the spelling process: A comparison of different codes. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention, pp. 261–294. Chichester: John Wiley.
41. Marcel, A.J. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impainnents. In M. Coltheart, K.E. Patterson, & J.C. Marshall (Eds), Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge.
42. Marshall, J.C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175-199.
43. McCIoskey, M., & Caramazza, A. (1991). On crude data and impoverished theory. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 14, 453-455.
44. McCIoskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Shulman, R., & Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 341-392.
45. McLaren. I.P.L., Kaye. H., & Mackintosh. N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R.G.M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Miceti, G., Silveri, M.C., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Cognitive analysis of a case of pure agraphia. Brain and Language, 25, 187-212.
47. Moody, J., & Darken, C. (1988). Learning with localised receptive fields. In D. Touretzky, G. Hinton, & T. Sejnowski (Eds), Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School (Pittsburgh 1988), pp. 133–143. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
48. Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465-501.
49. Morton, J. (1980). The logogen model and orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive approaches in spelling. London: Academic Press.
50. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1994). A frequent occurrence? Factors affecting the production of semantic errors in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 289-320.
51. Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. Center for Human Information Processing Technical Report No. 99. Reprinted in revised form in RJ. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds) (1986). Consciousness and self-regulation, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press.
52. Olson, A., & Caramazza, A. (1994). Representation and connectionist models: The NETspell experience. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention, pp. 337–363. Chichester John Wiley.
53. Plaut, D.C., & McClelland, J. (1993). Generalisation with componential attractors: Word and nonword reading in an attractor network. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 824–829. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
54. Plaut, D.C., & Shallice, T. (1993a). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
55. Plaut, D.C., & Shallice, T. (1993b). Perseverative and semantic influences on visual object naming in optic aphasia: A connectionist account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 89–117.
56. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K.E. (in press). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review.
57. Posteraro, L., Zinelli, P., & Mazzucchi, A. (1988). Selective impairment of the graphemic buffer in acquired dysgraphia: A case study. Brain and Language, 35, 274-286.
58. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56.
59. Quinlan, P.T. (1993). The Oxford psycholinguistic database. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Rumelhart, D.E., & Norman, D.A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1-36.
61. Schwartz, M.F., Reed, E.S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N.H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 381-414.
62. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.