Is there a bias in arbitration of nonunion employment disputes? an analysis of actual cases and outcomes

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 369-386

  Bingham, Lisa B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937291945     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022770     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Baxter, R. H., Jr., & Hunt, E. M. (1989). Alternative dispute resolution: Arbitration of employment claims. Employee Relations Law Journal, 15, 187–207.
2. Bemmels, B. (1988a). The effect of grievants’ gender on arbitrators’ decisions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41, 251–262.
3. Bemmels, B. (1988b). Gender effects in discipline arbitration: Evidence from British Columbia. Academy of Management Journal, 31,699–706.
4. Bemmels, B. (1988c). Gender effects in discharge arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 42, 63–76.
5. Bemmels, B. (1990a). The effects of grievants’ gender and arbitrator characteristics on arbitration decisions. Labor Studies Journal, 15, 48–61.
6. Bemmels, B. (1990b). Arbitrator characteristics and arbitrator decisions. Journal of Labor Research, 11, 181–192.
7. Bemmels, B. (1991a). Attribution theory and discipline arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44, 548–562.
8. Bemmels, B. (1991b). Gender effects in grievance arbitration. Industrial Relations, 30, 150–162.
9. Block, R. N., & Stieber, J. (1987). The impact of attorneys and arbitrators on arbitration awards. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 40, 543–555.
10. Bloom, D. E., & Cavanagh, C. L. (1986). An analysis of the selection of arbitrators. American Economic Review, 76, 408–422.
11. Clay, J. M., & Stephens, E. C. (1994). An analysis of absenteeism arbitration cases: Factors used by arbitrators in making decisions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 130–142.
12. Dertouzos, J. N., Holland, E., & Ebener, P. (1988). The legal and economic consequences of wrongful termination. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
13. Dertouzos, J. N., & Karoly, L. A. (1992). Labor-market responses to employer liability. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
14. Edwards, R. (1993). Rights at work: Employment relations in the post-union era. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15. Faurot, D. J., & McAllister, S. (1992). Salary arbitration and pre-arbitration negotiation in major league baseball. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 697–710.
16. Feuille, P., & Schwochau, S. (1988). The decisions of interest arbitrators. Arbitration Journal, 43, 28–35.
17. Fleming, R. W. (1967). The labor arbitration process. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
18. Greenfield, P. A. (1992). How do arbitrators treat external law? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 683–696.
19. Jacobs, M. A. (1995, February 5). Some workers resist mandatory arbitration. Star Tribune, p. 1J.
20. Malin, M. H.,& Ladenson, R. F. (1993). Privatizing justice: A jurisprudential perspective on labor and employment arbitration from the Steelworkers Trilogy to Gilmer. Hastings Law Journal, 44,1187–1240.
21. Mallor, J. P. (1985). Punitive damages for wrongful discharge of at will employees. William & Mary Law Review, 26, 449-496.
22. McCammon, M., & Cotton, J. L. (1990). Arbitration decisions in subcontracting disputes. Industrial Relations, 29,135-144.
23. McDermott, E. P. (1995). Survey: Using ADR to settle employment disputes. Dispute Resolution Journal, 50, 8–13.
24. Mesch, D. J., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). Workplace justice outcomes “in the name of the union:” A field assessment. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 45–54.
25. Mesch, D. J., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). Workplace justice outcomes: Arbitration “in the name of the union.” International Journal of Conflict Management, 3, 31–43.
26. Mesch, D. J. (June, 1993). Gender and workplace justice: The case of arbitration outcomes in the public sector. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Hengelhoef, Belgium.
27. Morris, C. J. (1987). EGAPs—Arbitration plans for nonunion employees. Pepperdine Law Review, 14, 827–837.
28. Nelson, N. E., & Curry, E. M. (1981). Arbitrator characteristics and arbitral decisions. Industrial Relations, 20, 312–317.
29. Oswald, S. L. (1991). Students as arbitrators: An empirical investigation. Industrial Relations, 30,286-293.
30. Rau, A. S. (1993). Resolving disputes over attorneys' fees: The role of ADR. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46, 2005–2078.
31. Schwochau, S., & Feuille, P. (1988). Interest arbitrators and their decision behavior. Industrial Relations, 27, 37–55.
32. Schneider-Denenberg, T. (1994). The future of the workplace dispute resolver. Dispute Resolution Journal, 49, 48–58.
33. Seidman, L., & Aalberts, R. J. (1993). Managing employer-employee conflict: A case for arbitration and the Model Employment Termination Act. International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 263–275.
34. Skrainka, S. W. (1993). The utility of arbitration agreements in employment manuals and collective bargaining agreements for resolving civil rights, age and ADA claims. St. Louis Law Journal, 37, 985–1001.
35. Tata, J. (1994). Accounts in arbitration: Do they make a difference? International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 369–381.
36. Thornton, R. J., & Zirkel, P. A. (1990). The consistency and predictability of grievance arbitration awards. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43, 294–307.
37. Westerkamp, P. R., & Miller, A. K. (1971). The acceptability of inexperienced arbitrators. Labor Law Journal, 22, 763–770.