Morphological uniformity and the null subject parameter in adult SLA

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 475-493

  Davies, William D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937281790     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100015382     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S., & loup, G. (1988). The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 1–32.
2. Borer, H. (1989). Anaphoric AGR. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 69–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Chomsky, N. (1981a). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Chomsky, N. (1981b). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics (pp. 32–75). London: Longman.
5. Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners—A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119.
6. Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1989). The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 5, 1–29.
7. Comrie, B. (1984). Why linguists need language acquirers. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universal and second language acquisition (pp. 11–29). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Cyrino, S. (1986). The Pro-Drop Parameter and second language acquisition. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
9. Davies, W. (1988, April). The re-emergence of the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Paper presented at the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
10. Davies, W., & Kaplan, T. (1995, October). Native speaker vs. L2 learner grammaticality judgments. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
11. duPlessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L., & White, L. (1987). UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research, 3, 56–75.
12. Eckman, F. (1984). Umversals, typology, and interlanguage. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universal and second language acquisition (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Ellis, R. (1990). Grammaticality judgements and learner variability, In H. Burmeister & P. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 25–60). Eugene: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
14. Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgements and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161–186.
15. Felix, S. (1988). UG-generated knowledge in adult second language acquisition, In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Finer, D., & Broselow, E. (1986). Second language acquisition of reflexive binding. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society, 16, 154–168.
17. Foster-Cohen, S. (1993). Directions of influence in first and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 9, 140–151.
18. Gass, S. (1993). SLA: Past, present, and future. Second Language Research, 9, 99–117.
19. Gass, S. (1994). The reliability of second-language grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 303–322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Gass, S., & Ard, J. (1980). L2 data: Their relevance for language universal. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 443–452.
21. Goss, N., Ying-Hua, Z., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Two heads may be better than one: Assessing mental activity in L2 grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 263–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Hilles, S. (1986). Interlanguage and the Pro-Drop Parameter. Second Language Research, 2, 33–52.
23. Hilles, S. (1989). Access to UG in second language acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
24. Hilles, S. (1991). Access to universal grammar in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 305–338). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
25. Huang, C. T. J. (1989). Pro-Drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 185–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
27. Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
28. Jaeggli, O., & Hyams, N. (1988). Morphological uniformity and the setting of the Null Subject Parameter. Northeastern Linguistic Society, 18, 238–252.
29. Jaeggli, O., & Safir, K. (1989). The Null Subject Parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 1–44). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30. Lakshmanan, U. (1986). The role of parametric variation in adult SLA: A study of the “Pro-Drop” Parameter. Papers in Applied Linguistics—Michigan, 2, 97–118.
31. Lakshmanan, U. (1991). Morphological uniformity and null-subjects in child second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 389–410). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Lakshmanan, U. (1994). Universal Grammar in child second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
33. Lantolf, J. (1990). Reassessing the Null-Subject Parameter in second language acquisition. In H. Burmeister & P. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 429–452). Eugene: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
34. Liceras, J. (1989). On some properties of the “Pro-Drop” Parameter: Looking for missing subjects in nonnative Spanish. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Liceras, J. (1991, October). Grammaticality judgements revisited: The content of empty categories in native and non-native Spanish. Paper presented at the conference on Theory Construction and Methodology in Second Language Acquisition Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
36. Lillo-Martin, D. (1991). Universal Grammar and American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
37. Lust, B. (1988). Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: Promises and problems in critically relating theory and empirical studies. In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 309–328). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. Lyons, C. (1989). The Null Subject Parameter in the acquisition of English as a second language. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
39. Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 227–243). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Newmeyer, F. (1986). Linguistic theory in America. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
41. Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
42. Perlmutter, D., & Zaenen, A. (1984). The Indefinite Extraposition construction in Dutch and German. In D. Perlmutter & C. Rosen (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar 2 (pp. 171–216). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Phinney, M. (1987). The Pro-Drop Parameter in second language acquisition. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 221–238). Dordrecht: Reidel.
44. Platt, E. (1989, April). Assessing the viability of a parameter-setting model for second language acquisition: A study of adult Spanish and Vietnamese learners of English. Paper presented at the Eighteenth Annual University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Linguistics Symposium.
45. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.
46. Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
47. Schwartz, B. (1987). The modular basis of second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
48. Tomaselli, A., & Schwartz, B. (1990). Analysing the acquisition stages of negation in L2 German: Support for UG in adult SLA. Second Language Research, 6, 1–38.
49. Wang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C., & Levitt, A. (1992). Null subjects and objects in the acquisition of Chinese. Language Acquisition, 2, 221–254.
50. White, L. (1985). The “Pro-Drop” Parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35, 45–62.
51. White, L. (1986). Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: An investigation of the Pro-Drop Parameter. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language learning (pp. 55–72). New York: Pergamon Press.
52. White, L. (1992a). Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 273–286.
53. White, L. (1992b). Universal Grammar: Is it just a new name for old problems? In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 217–232). Amsterdam: Benjamins.