Pronominal reference to inferred antecedents

Belgian Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 55-67

  Ziv, Yael ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937280473     PISSN: 07745141     EISSN: 15699676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/bjl.10.05ziv     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
2. Brown, G. and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Clark, H.H. 1977. “Bridging”. Thinking. Readings in Cognitive Science ed. by P.N. Johnson-Laird and P.C. Wason, 411-420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bradford Books.
5. Fraurud, K. 1992. Processing Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University.
6. Green, G. 1990. “The universality of Gricean interpretation”. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by K. Hall, J.P. Koenig, M. Meacham, S. Reinman and L.A. Sutton, 411-428. Berkeley, Ca: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
7. Gundel, J.K., N. Hedberg and R. Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language 69. 274-307.
8. Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral Dissertation, Universirty of Massachussets, Amherst.
9. Kantor, R.N. 1977. The Management and Comprehension of Discourse Connection by Pronouns in English. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University.
10. Kasher, A. 1976. “Conversational maxims and rationality”. Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems ed. by A. Kasher, 197-216. Dordrecht: Reidel.
11. Kasher, A. 1982. “Gricean inference revisited”. Philosophica 29.25-44.
12. Kave, G. 1994. On the impersonal plural pronoun in Hebrew, (ms)
13. Landau, R. 1995. Anaphora and discourse deixis reconsidered, (ms. tentative title)
14. Nunberg, G. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
15. Postal, P. 1969. “Anaphoric islands”. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. 205-239.
16. Roberts, C. 1989. “Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse”. Linguistics and Philosophy 12.683-721.
17. Sanford, A.J. and S.C. Garrod. 1981. Understanding Written Language. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Schank, R.C. and R. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackell.
20. Tic Douloureux, P.R.N. 1971. “A note on one’s privates”. Studies out in Left Field: Defamatory essays presented to James D. McCawley on the occasion of his 33 rd or 34 th birthday ed. by A. Zwicky et al., 45-52. Edmonton and Champaign: Linguistic Research, Inc.
21. Ward, G., R. Sproat and G. McKoon. 1991. “A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands”. Language 67. 439-474.
22. Wilson, D. 1992. “Reference and relevance”. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 1-25.
23. Ziv, Y. 1988. “On the rationality of ‘relevance’ and the relevance of ‘rationality’”. Journal of Pragmatics 12. 535-545.
24. Ziv, Y 1994. “Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora”. Journal of Pragmatics 22. 629-645.
25. Ziv, Y and B. J. Grosz. 1994. “Right dislocation and attentional state”. The Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference and of the Workshop on Discourse of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics ed. by R. Buchalla and A. Mittwoch, 184-199. Jerusalem: Akademon.