Directionality in translation processes and practices

Target

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 49-73

  Sophia, A ^a   Marmaridou, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937277188     PISSN: 09241884     EISSN: 15699986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/target.8.1.04mar     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baker, Mona. 1992. In Other Words: A Coursehook on Translation. London and New York: Routledge.
2. Broeck, Raymond van den. 1986. “Contrastive Discourse Analysis as a Tool for the Interpretation of Shifts in Translated Texts”. House and Blum-Kulka 1986: 37-47.
3. Chesterman, Andrew. 1993. “From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’: Laws, Norms and Strategies in Translation Studies”. Target 5:1.
4. Dendrinos, Bessie. 1992. The EFL 1-20Textbook and Ideology. Athens: N.C. Grivas Publications.
5. Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1984. “Contrastive Linguistics and Text Linguistics”. Fisiak 1984: 4567.
6. Fairclaugh, Norman. 1989a. Language and Power. London: Longman.
7. Fairclaugh, Norman. 1989b. Discourse and Power. London: Longman.
8. Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. “Scenes-and-frames Semantics”. Antonio Zampolli, ed. Linguistic Structure Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977. 55-81.
9. Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”. Quademi di Semantica 6:2. 222-253.
10. Fillmore, Charles J. and Beryl T. Atkins. 1992. “Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and Its Neighbours”. A. Lehrer and E.F. Kittay, eds. Frames, Fields and Contrast: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992. 75-102.
11. Fisiak, Jacek, ed. 1984. Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems. Berlin-New York-Amsterdam: Mouton. [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 22.]
12. Gerloff, Pamela. 1986. “Second Language Learners’ Reports on the Interpretive Process: Talk-aloud Protocols of Translation”. House and Blum-Kulka 1986: 243-262.
13. Gutt, Ernst-August. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
14. Hartmann, Reinhard R.K. 1980. Contrastive Textology. Heidelberg: Julius Groos. [Studies in Descriptive Linguistics, 5.]
15. Hatim, Basil and Ian Mason. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.
16. House, Juliane. 1986. “Acquiring Translational Competence in Interaction”. House and Blum-Kulka 1986: 179-191.
17. House, Juliane and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, eds. 1986. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingen: Narr.
18. Jääskeläinen, Riitta. 1989. “Translation Assignment in Professional vs. Non-Professional Translation: A Think-Aloud Protocol Study”. Seguinot 1989: 87-98.
19. Jääskeläinen, Riitta. 1990. “Some Differences between Professionals’ vs. Novices’ Translation Processes: Reactions to the Translation Assignment”. Nyyssänen et al. 1990: 43-51.
20. Jääskeläinen, Riitta and Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit. 1991. “Automatised Processes in Professional vs. Non-Professional Translation: A Think-Aloud Protocol Study”. Tirkkonen-Condit 1991: 89-110.
21. Johnson, Mark. 1992. “Philosophical Implications of Cognitive Semantics”. Cognitive Linguistics 3:4. 345-366.
22. Kopczyiiski, Andrzej. 1984. “Problems of Quality in Conference Interpreting”. Fisiak 1984: 283-300.
23. Kress, Gunter. 1989. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Kussmaul, Paul. 1994. “Semantic Models and Translating”. Target 6:1. 1-13.
25. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Lakoff, George. 1992. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. Andrew Ortony, ed. Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 1-51.
27. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
29. Langacker, Ronald W. 1992. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, II: Descriptive Applications. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
30. Lörscher, Wolfgang. 1994. “Process-Oriented Research into Translation and Implications for Translation Teaching”. Paper distributed in advance of the XXVIII International Conference on Cross-Language Studies and Contrastive Linguistics held at Rydzyna, Poland, December 15-17, 1994.
31. Marmaridou, A. Sophia S. 1987. “Semantic and Pragmatic Parameters of Meaning: On the Interface between Contrastive Text Analysis and the Production of Translated Texts”. Journal of Pragmatics 11. 721-736.
32. Marmaridou, A. Sophia S. 1991. “Cognitive Structures in BBC Financial Reports”. ERIC Resources in Education: Language and Linguistics. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
33. Marmaridou, A. Sophia S. 1994. “Conceptual Metaphor in Greek Financial Discourse”. Phillipaki-Warburton et al. 1994. 247-252.
34. Nyyssönen, Heikki, Leena Kuure, Elise Kärkkäinen and Pirkko Raudaskoski, eds. 1990. Proceedings from the 2nd Finnish Seminar on Discourse Analysis, Oulu, September 27-28, 1988. Oulu: University of Oulu.
35. Phillipaki-Warburton, Irene, Katerina Nicolaidis and Maria Sifianou, eds. 1994. Themes in Greek Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. “Human Categorization”. Neil Wallren, ed. Studies in CrossCultural Psychology, I. London: Academic Press, 1977. 1-49.
37. Seguinot, Candace, ed. 1989. The Translation Process. Toronto: H.G. Publications, School of Translation, York University.
38. Selinker, L. 1972. “Interlanguage”. IRAL 10. 219-231.
39. Shreve, Gregory M., Christina Schäffner, Joseph H. Danks and Jennifer Griffin. 1993. “Is There a Special Kind of ‘Reading’ for Translation?: An Empirical Investigation of Reading in the Translation Process”. Target 5:1. 21-41.
40. Snell-Hornby, Mary, ed. 1986. Übersetzungswissenschaft: Eine Neuorientierung. Tübingen: Francke.
41. Snell-Homby, Mary. 1988. Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43. Tabakowska, Elzbieta. 1993. Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation. Tübingen: Narr.
44. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja. 1989. “Professional vs. Non-Professional Translation: A Think-Aloud Protocol Study”. Seguinot 1989: 73-85.
45. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja, ed. 1991. Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies: Selected Papers of the TRANSIF Seminar, Savonlinna 1988. Tübingen: Narr.
46. Toury, Gideon. 1980. In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Aviv University.
47. Toury, Gideon. 1986. “Monitoring Discourse Transfer: A Test-Case for a Developmental Model of Translation”. House and Blum-Kulka 1986: 79-94.
48. Vannerem, Mia and Mary Snell-Hornby. 1986. “Die Szene hinter dem Text: ‘Scenes-and-frames semantics’ in der Übersetzung”. Snell-Hornby 1986: 184-205.
49. Weizman, Elda. 1986. “An Interlingual Study of Discourse Structures: Implications for the Theory of Translation”. House and Blum-Kulka 1986: 115-126.
50. Zydatiss, W. 1982. “Text Type Oriented Contrastive Linguistics and Its Implications for Translation Pedagogy at University Level”. IRAL 20:3. 175-191.