The effect of physical attractiveness on video dating outcomes

Sociological Focus

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 83-85

  Stack, Steven ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937274634     PISSN: 00380237     EISSN: 21621128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00380237.1996.10571074     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Ahuvia, Aaron and Mara Adelraan. 1992. “Formal Intermediaries in the Marriage Market.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:452-463.
2. Green, S., D.R. Buchanan and S. Heuer. 1984. “Winners, Losers and Choosers: A Field Investigation of Dating Initiation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10:502-511.
3. Greenlees, I.A. and W.C. McGrew. 1994. “Sex and Age Differences in Preferences and Tactics of Male Attraction: Analysis of Published Advertisements.” Ethology and Sociobiology 15:59-72.
4. Morgan, S.P. and J. Teachman. 1988. “Logistic Regression.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:929-936.
5. Smith, Jane, V. AnnWaldorf and David Trembath. 1990. “Single White Male Looking for Thin, Very Attractive…” Sex Roles 23:675-685.
6. Stack, S. 1991. “Mate Selection: An Analysis of Replies to the Personals.” Paper read at the annual meetings of the North Central Sociological Association, Dearborn, Michigan.
7. Woll, S. 1986. “So Many to Choose From: Decision Strategies in Videodating.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 3:43-52.
8. Woll, S. and P. Young. 1989. “Looking for Mr. or Ms. Right: Self Presentation in Videodating.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:483-488.