Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of english

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 69-90

  Major, Roy C ^a   Faudree, Michael C ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937273752     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100014686     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adamson, H. D., & Regan, V. M. (1991). The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 1–22.
2. Altenberg, E., & Vago, R. (1983). Theoretical implications of an error analysis of second language phonology production. Language Learning, 33, 427–448.
3. Anderson, J. L. (1983). The markedness differential hypothesis and syllable structure difficulty. In G. S. Nathan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on the Uses of Phonology (pp. 85–89). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
4. Anderson, J. I. (1987). The Markedness Differential Hypothesis and syllable structure difficulty. In G. Ioup & S. H. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 279–291). New York: Newbury House.
5. Archibald, J. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 301–339.
6. Archibald, J. (1993). The learnability of English metrical parameters by Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 129–141.
7. Benson, B. (1988). Universal preference for the open syllable as an independent process in interlanguage phonology. Language Learning, 38, 221–235.
8. Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, Ml: Karoma.
9. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge University Press.
10. Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1990). Second language processing of subordinate clauses and anaphorafirst language and universal influences: A review of Flynn’s research. Language Learning, 40, 245–285.
11. Broselow, E., & Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35–59.
12. Carlisle, R. (1988). The effect of markedness on epenthesis in Spanish/English interlanguage phonology. IDEAL, 3, 15–23.
13. Carlisle, R. (1991). The influence of environment on vowel epenthesis in Spanish/English interphonology. Applied Linguistics, 12, 76–95.
14. Carlisle, R. (1994). Markedness and environment as internal constraints on the variability of interlanguage phonology. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 223–249). San Diego, CA: Singular.
15. Chu, H. S., & Park, Y. (1979). A contrastive analysis between Korean and English for ESL teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 191 300).
16. Cichocki, W., House, A. B., Kinloch, A. M., & Lister, A. C. (1993). Cantonese speakers and the acquisition of French consonants. Language Learning, 43, 43–68.
17. Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119.
18. Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1989). The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 5, 1–29.
19. Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330.
20. Eckman, F. R. (1981a). On predicting phonological difficulty in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 18–30.
21. Eckman, F. R. (1981b). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31,195–216.
22. Eckman, F. R. (1984). Universals, typologies, and interlanguage. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universal and second language acquisition (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23. Eckman, F. R. (1991). The Structural Conformity Hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 23–41.
24. Eckman, F., & Iverson, G. (1993). Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Second Language Research, 9, 234–252.
25. Eckman, F., & Iverson, G. (1994). Pronunciation difficulties in ESL: Coda consonants in English interlanguage. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 251–265). San Diego, CA: Singular.
26. Edge, B. (1991). The production of word-final voiced obstruents in English by L1 speakers of Japanese and Cantonese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 377–393.
27. Faudree, M. C. (1995). Voice contrast in Korean to English interlanguage applied to linguistic theories. Unpublished applied project, Arizona State University, Tempe.
28. Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.
29. Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J. (1994). The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 381–411.
30. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16, 1–26.
31. Flynn, S. (1987). A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.
32. Flynn, S., & Lust, B. (1990). In defense of parameter-setting in L2 acquisition: A reply to Bley-Vroman and Chaudron ’90. Language Learning, 40, 1–31.
33. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
34. Givón, T. (1984). Universals of discourse structure and second language acquisition. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 109–136). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
35. Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C., & Moravcsik, E. (Eds.). (1978). Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Hodne, B. (1985). Yet another look at interlanguage phonology: The modification of English syllable structure by native speakers of Polish. Language Learning, 35, 405–422.
37. Hyams, N. M. (1985). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
38. Hyltenstam, K., & Viberg, A. (Eds.). (1993). Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological, and linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals (A. R. Keiler, Trans.). The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published 1941)
40. Krashen, S. D. (1977). Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL 77 (pp. 144–158). Washington, DC: TESOL.
41. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
42. Leather, J., & James, A. (1991). The acquisition of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 305–341.
43. Major, R. C. (1987a). A model for interlanguage phonology. In G. Ioup & S. H. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 101–124). New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
44. Major, R. C. (1987b). Phonological similarity, markedness, and rate of L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 63–82.
45. Major, R. C. (1987c). Variation in second language phonology. In A. Miller & J. Powers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (pp. 40–51). Columbus: The Ohio State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 310 622)
46. Major, R. C. (1994a). Chronological and stylistic aspects of second language acquisition of consonant clusters. Language Learning, 44, 655–680.
47. Major, R. C. (1994b). Current trends in interlanguage phonology. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 181–204). San Diego, CA: Singular.
48. Major, R. C. (1995). Native and nonnative phonological representations. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 32, 109–127.
49. McLaughlin, B. (1978). The monitor model: Some methodological considerations. Language Learning, 28, 309–332.
50. Mufwene, S. S. (1990). Transfer and the substrate hypothesis in creolistics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 1–23.
51. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Oiler, J. W., & Ziahosseiny, S. M. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis and spelling errors. Language Learning, 20, 183–189.
53. Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465–497.
54. Piper, T. (1984). Observations on the second language acquisition of the English sound system. Canadian Modern Language Review, 40, 542–551.
55. Preston, D. R. (1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
56. Preston, D. R., & Bayley, R. (Eds.), (in press). Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
57. Pyun, K.-S. (1987). Korean-Swedish interlanguage phonology. Stockholm: Institute of Oriental Languages, University of Stockholm.
58. Riney, T. (1989). Syllable structure and interlanguage phonology. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 21–40. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
59. Robson, B. (1979). Teaching English pronunciation to Koreans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 195 129)
60. Sankoff, D. (1982). Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K. J. Mattheier (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 984–997). Berlin: de Gruyter.
61. Sasaki, Y. (1994). Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages: A competition model approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 19–42.
62. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
63. Schumann, J. (1978). The pidginization hypothesis: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
64. Schumann, J. (1986). Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, 379–392.
65. Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.
66. Templin, M. (1957). Certain language skills in children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
67. Veatch, T. (1989, December). Final devoicing of fricatives in English. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 424)
68. Wellman, B., Case, I., Mengert, I., & Bradley, P. (1931). Speech sounds of young children. Studies in Child Welfare, 5, 1–82.
69. White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
70. White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181–204.
71. Wode, H. (1981). Learning a second language. Tübingen: Narr.
72. Yavas, M. (1994). Final stop devoicing in interlanguage. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 267–282). San Diego, CA: Singular.
73. Young-Scholten, M. (1985). Interference reconsidered: The role of similarity in second language acquisition. Selecta, 6, 6–12.