Lexical categories

Theoretical Linguistics

Volumn 22, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 1-48

  Wunderlich, Dieter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937272437     PISSN: 03014428     EISSN: 16134060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/thli.1996.22.1-2.1     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Amith, J.D. & Smith-Stark, T.C. (1994). Transitive nouns and split possessive paradigms in Central Guerrero Nahuatl. International journal of American Linguistics 60, pp. 342-368
2. Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, pp. 5-16
3. Baker, M.C. (1993). The polysynthesis parameter. Ms., McGill University
4. Bittner, M. (1994). Case, Scope, and Binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer
5. Bok-Bennema, R. (1991). Case and Agreement in Inuit. Berlin: Foris
6. Bierwisch, M. (1989). Event nominalizations: proposals and problems. Linguistische Studien 194, ZISW der Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin, pp. 1-73
7. Bresnan, J. (1982). Control and complementation. In: J. Bresnan (ed.) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (pp. 282-390). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8. Broschart, J. (1995). Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Working papers SFB 282 “Theorie des Lexikons”, No. 70
9. Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In: R. A. Jacobs & P.S. Rosenbaum (eds.). Readings in English Transformational Grammar (pp. 184-221). Waltham, MA: Ginn
10. Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
11. Churchward, C.M. (1953). Tongan Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
12. Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
13. Déchaine, R.-M. (1993). Predicates Across Categories. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Graduate Linguistic Student Association
14. Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
15. Dixon, R.M.W. (1977). Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1, pp. 19-80
16. Egli, U. & von Heusinger, K. (1995). The epsilon operator and -type pronouns. In: Urs Egli et al. (1995). Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language (pp. 121-146). Amsterdam: Benjamins
17. Fabri, R. (1993). Kongruenz und die Grammatik des Maltesischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer
18. Fortescue, M. (1984). West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm
19. Grimshaw, J. (1991). Extended Projection. Ms., Brandeis University
20. Haider, H. (1988). Matching projections. In: A. Cardinaletti et al. (eds.). Constituent structure: Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference (pp. 101-121). Venice: Annali di Ca'Foscari 27
21. Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (1992). The syntactic character of thematic structure. In: I.M. Roca (ed.). Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar (pp. 107-143). Berlin: Foris
22. Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (1995). The limits of argument structure. Ms., MIT
23. Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
24. Hopper, P.J. & Thompson, S.A. (1984). The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60, pp. 703-752
25. Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. Johns, A. (1987). Transitivity and Grammatical Relations in Inuktitut. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Ottawa
27. Joppen, S. & Wunderlich, D. (1995). Argument linking in Basque. Lingua 97, pp. 123-169
28. Keizer, M. E. (1992). Predicates as referring expressions. In: M. Fortescue, P. Harder & L. Kristoffersen (eds.). Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam: Benjamins
29. Kinkade, D. (1983). Salish evidence against the universality of ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. Lingua 60, pp. 25-40
30. Kiparsky, P. (1992). Structural Case. Ms., Institute for Advanced Study Berlin
31. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. & Muravjova, I.A. (1993). Alutor causatives, noun incorporation and the Mirror Principle. In: B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (eds.). Causatives and Transitivity (pp. 287-313). Amsterdam: Benjamins
32. Kratzer, A. (1989/95). Stage and level individual level predicates. In: G. N. Carlson & F. C. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book (pp. 125-175). Chicago: Chicago University Press
33. Langacker, R. (1987). Nouns and verbs. Language 63, pp. 53-94
34. Lefebvre, C. & Muysken, P. (1988). Mixed Categories. Nominalizations in Quechua. Dordrecht: Kluwer
35. Lenz, (1995): Un-Affigierung: unrealisierbare Argumente, unausweichliche Fragen, nicht unplausible Antworten. Tübingen: Narr
36. Li, C.N. & Thompson, S.A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese. A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press
37. Mithun, M. (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60, pp. 847-893
38. Ortmann, A. (1994). Possessorkongruenz. Eine Fallstudie zum Verhältnis von Semantik, Morphologie und Syntax. M. A. Thesis, University of Düsseldorf
39. Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
40. Postal, P.M. (1962). Some Syntactic Rules in Mohawk. Ph. D. Dissertation Yale University. Published in New York: Garland 1979
41. Rauh, G. (1993). Grammatische Kategorien. Working papers SFB 282 “Theorie des Lexikons”, No. 39
42. Sasse, H.-J. (1992). Das Nomen - eine universale Kategorie? Working papers SFB 282 “Theorie des Lexikons”, No. 27
43. Sasse, H.-J. (1993). Syntactic categories and subcategories. In: J. Jacobs. A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (eds.). Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (pp. 646-686). Berlin: de Gruyter
44. Schachter, P. (1985). Parts-of-speech system. In: T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume I: Clause Structure (pp. 3-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
45. Seiler, H. (1982). Possessivity, Subject and Object. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts No. 43, University of Cologne
46. Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
47. Steinitz, R. (1995 a). Towards a revision of the lexical subcategorization features. FAS Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 101∼116
48. Steinitz, R. (1995 b). Lexikalische Kategorisierung: Ein Vorschlag zur Revision. Ms., Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie und Universalienforschung, Berlin
49. Stiebels, B. (1994). Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag von verbalen Präfixen und Partikeln. Phil. Diss., University of Düsseldorf
50. Toman, J. (1986). A (word-) syntax for participles. Linguistische Berichte 105, pp. 367-408
51. Urbas, M. (1990). Denominale Verben. Semantische undkonzeptuelle Aspekte. M. A. Thesis, University of Düsseldorf
52. Van Geenhoven, V. (1995). Semantic incorporation: A uniform semantics for West Greenlandic noun incorporation and West Germanic bare plural configurations. To appear in Proceedings of the 31st Meeting of the CLS
53. Walter, H. (1981). Studien zur Nomen-Verb-Distinktion aus typologischer Sicht. München: Fink
54. Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins
55. Wiese, R. (1988). Silbische und lexikalische Phänologie. Studien zum Chinesischen und Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer
56. Williams, E. (1980). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1, pp.81-114
57. Wunderlich, D. (1986). Probleme der Wortstruktur. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 5, pp. 209-252
58. Wunderlich, D. (1987 a). An investigation of lexical composition: the case of German be-verbs. Linguistics 25, pp. 283-331
59. Wunderlich, D. (1987 b). Partizipien im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 111, pp. 345-366
60. Wunderlich, D. (1991). How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29, pp. 591-621
61. Wunderlich, D. (1992). Cause and the structure of verbs. Working papers SFB 282 “Theorie des Lexikons”, No. 36
62. Wunderlich, D. (1993). Funktionale Kategorien im Lexikon. In: F. Beckmann & G. Heyer (eds.). Theorie und Praxis des Lexikons (pp. 54-73). Berlin: de Gruyter
63. Wunderlich, D. (1994a). Towards a lexicon-based theory of agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 20, pp. 1-35
64. Wunderlich, D. (1994b). Cause and the structure of verbs. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry
65. Wunderlich, D. (1995). A minimalist model of inflectional morphology. To appear in: C. Wilder, M. Bierwisch & H.-M. Gärtner (eds.). The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag
66. Wunderlich, D. & Fabri, R. (1993). Minimalist morphology: an approach to inflection. To appear in Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
67. Zaefferer, D. (1994). Überlegungen zu einer universalen Theorie der Attribution. Paper read at the DGfS Annual Meeting Münster
68. Zimmermann, I. (1985). Der syntaktische Parallelismus verbaler und adjektivischer Konstruktionen. Linguistische Studien 127, ZIWS der Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin, 159-213
69. Zimmermann, I. (1988). Die substantivische Verwendung von Adjektiven und Partizipien. In: M. Bierwisch, W. Motsch & I. Zimmermann (eds.). Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon (pp. 279-311). Berlin: Akademie Verlag
70. Zimmermann, I. (1991). Die Syntax der Substantivgruppe: Weiterentwicklungen der X-bar-Theorie. In: I. Zimmermann (ed.). Syntax und Semantik der Substantivgruppe (pp. 1-32). Berlin: Akademie Verlag
71. Zwarts, J. (1992). External Arguments. Ms., University of Utrecht