The new genetics and the politics of public health

Critical Public Health

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 59-71

  Petersen, Alan ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937265573     PISSN: 09581596     EISSN: 14693682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09581599808409212     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Peters, T., 1997. Playing god? Genetic determinism and human freedom, New York: Routledge.
2. Venter, C, and Cohen, D., 19–20 July 1997. “ Genetic code-breakers ”. In The Weekend Australian 19–20 July, 28
3. Conrad, P., 1997. Public eyes and private genes: historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Social Problems, 44 (2): 139–54.
4. Nelkin, D, and Lindee, S M. 1995. The DNA mystique: the gene as cultural icon, New York: WH Freeman.
5. Higgins, E., 14–15 June 1997. “ Men's bad behaviour all about what's in their genes ”. In The Weekend Australian 14–15 June, 12
6. Hubbard, R, and Wald, E., 1993. The eugenics of normalcy: the politics of gene research. The Ecologist, 23 (5): 185–91.
7. Sachs, B P, and Korf, B., 1993. The Human Genome Project: implications for the practicising obstetrician. Obstet Gynecol, 81 (3): 458–62.
8. King, D., 1995. The state of eugenics. New Statesman & Society, 25: 25–26. August
9. Andrews, L., 1996. Prenatal screening and the culture of motherhood. Hastings Law J, 47 (4): 967–1006.
10. Malinowski, M J. 1994. Coming into being: law, ethics, and the practice of prenatal genetic screening. Hastings Law J, 45 (6): 1435–1526.
11. Wyld, D C, Cappel, S D, and Hallock, D E. 1992. “ The new eugenics? employers and genetic screening in the ‘risk society’ ”. In Futures Research Q 23–35. Fall
12. Markel, H., 1992. The stigma of disease: implications of genetic screening. Am J Med, 93: 209–15.
13. Bauman, Z., 1997. Postmodernity and its discontents, Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Waldby, C, Kippax, S, and Crawford, J., 1995. Epidemiological knowledge and discriminatory practice: AIDS and the social relations of biomedicine. Aust N Z J Soc, 31 (1): 1–14.
15. Hamer, D, and Copeland, P., 1994. The science of desire: the search for the gay gene and the biology of behaviour, New York: Simon & Schuster.
16. Oudshoorn, N., 1994. Beyond the natural body: an archeology of sex hormones, London: Routledge.
17. Franklin, S., 1993. Essentialism, which essentialism? Some implications of reproductive and genetic techno-science. J Homosexuality, 24 (3/4): 27–39.
18. Crossley, M A. 1996. Choice, conscience, and context. Hastings Law J, 47 (4): 1223–39.
19. Allen, G., 1996. Science misapplied: the eugenics age revisited. Technology Rev, August/September: 23–31.
20. Petersen, A., 1996. Risk and the regulated self: the discourse of health promotion as politics of uncertainty. Aust N Z J Sociol, 32 (1): 44–57.
21. Petersen, A, and Lupton, D., 1996. The new public health: health and self in the age of risk, Sydney: Allen & London, Sage.
22. Chadwick, R, and Levitt, M., 1996. Euroscreen: ethical and philosophical issues of genetic screening in Europe. J R Coll Physicians Lond, 30 (1): 67–69.
23. Müller-Hill, B., 1993. The shadow of genetic injustice. Nature, 362: 491–92. (8 April)
24. Amalfi, C., 1997. Peril seen in gene test. The West Australian, 26: 7 July
25. Feldman, M K. 1996. Genetic screening: not just another blood test. Minn Med, 79: 14–18.
26. Hereditary Disease Unit. 1995. Your genetic counselling appointment Pamphlet produced by the Health Department of Western Australia with assistance from Genetic Counselling Services, Birth Defects Registry and Health Promotion Services, Perth
27. Weir, L., 1996. Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy Society, 25 (3): 373–92.
28. Birke, L, Himmelweit, S, and Vines, G., 1992. “ Detecting genetic diseases: prenatal screening and its problems ”. In Inventing women: science, technology and gender, Edited by: Kirkup, G, and Smith Keller, L. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29. Rothman, B K. 1995. Of maps and imaginations: sociology confronts the genome. Social Problems, 42 (1): 1–10.
30. Mahowald, M B, Levinson, D, Cassel, C. 1996. The new genetics and women. Milbank Q, 74 (2): 239–83.
31. Parsons, E, and Atkinson, P., 1993. Genetic risk and reproduction. Sociological Rev, 41 (4): 679–706.
32. Hill, S A. 1994. Motherhood and the obfuscation of medical knowledge: the case of sickle cell disease. Gender Society, 8 (1): 29–47.
33. Hereditary Disease Unit. 1995. Check your family health tree, Perth: Pamphlet produced by the Health Department of Western Australia.
34. Genetic Services of Western Australia. 1995. Genetic services of Western Australia, Perth: GSWA.
35. Gillon, R., 1994. Ethics of genetic screening: the first report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. J Med Ethics, 20: 67–68.
36. Hereditary Disease Unit. 1995. Testing for birth defects in pregnancy Pamphlet produced by the Health Department of Western Australia with assistance from Genetic Counselling Services, Birth Defects Registry and Health Promotion Services, Perth
37. Gupta, G K, and Bianchi, D W. 1997. DNA Diagnosis for the practicing obstetrician. Obst Gynecol Clin North Am, 24 (1): 123–142.
38. Haraway, D J. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature, New York: Routledge.
39. Waldschmidt, A., 1992. Against selection of human life–-people with disabilities oppose genetic counselling. Issues Reproductive Genetic Engineering, 5 (2): 155–67.