An interactional sociolinguistic analysis of turn-taking in an interpreted event

Interpreting

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 39-67

  Roy, Cynthia B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937263148     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.1.1.04roy     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, B.(1976). Perspectives on the role of the interpreter. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp.208-225). New York: Gardner Press
2. Baker, C. (1977). Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In L.Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives in American Sign Language (pp. 215-236). New York: Academic Press
3. Bennett, A. (1981). Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes, 4, 171-188
4. Berk-Seligson, S. (1990). The bilingual courtroom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
5. Chernov, G.V. (1978). Theory and practice of simultaneous interpretation. (J.R. Myers, Trans., 1980) Unpublished Master’s thesis, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, CA
6. Cokely, D. (1984). Towards a sociolinguistic model of the interpreting process: ASL and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, D.C
7. Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283-292
8. Edelsky, C. (1981). Who’s got the floor? Language and Society, 10, 383-421
9. Erickson, F. (1986). Listening and speaking. InD. Tannen &J. Alatis (Eds.), GURT1985: The Interdependence of Theory, Data, and Application (294-319). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press
10. Erickson, F. &Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press
11. Gerver, D. (1974). Simultaneous listening and speaking and retention of prose. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 337-342
12. Gerver, D. (1976). Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 165-207). New York: Gardner Press
13. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press
14. Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
15. Kannapell, B. M. (1985). Language choice reflects identity choice: A sociolinguistic study of deaf college students. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press
16. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Hale, S. (1996).‘You shall truly and faithfully interpret the evidence’ — What does that mean to the interpreter? Proceedings of the XIV World Congress of the Fédération Internationale des Traducteurs, Vol. 1., (pp. 424-431). Sydney, Australia: Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators
18. Hatim, B., &Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. London: Longman
19. Ingram, R.M. (1985). Simultaneous interpretation of sign languages: Semiotic and psycholinguistic perspectives. Multilingua, 4, 91-102
20. Kochman, T. (1981). Black and white styles in conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
21. Lambert, S. (1983). Recall and recognition among conference interpreters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
22. McDermott, R. P., &Tylbor, H. (1983). On the necessity of collusion in conversation. Text, J (31), 277-297
23. Moser B. (1978). Simultaneous interpretation: A hypothetical model and its practical application. In D. Gerver &W.H. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language, interpretation and communication (pp. 353-368). New York: Plenum Press
24. Nida, E. (1976). A framework for the analysis and evaluation of theories of translation. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 47-91). New York: Gardner Press
25. 9 s role in the turn exchanges of an Interpreted event. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (University Microfilms, Inc. DA064793)
26. Roy, C. B. (1993). The problem with definitions, descriptions, and the role metaphor of interpreters. Journal of Interpretation, 6, 127-153
27. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., &Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735
28. Shuy, R. (1987). A sociolinguistic view of interpreter education. In M. Mclntire (Ed.), New dimensions in interpreter education: Curriculum and instruction. Silver Spring, MD: Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf
29. Shuy, R. (1990). A brief history of American sociolinguistics 1949-1989. Historiographia Linguistica, XVII, (1/2), 183- 209
30. Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co
31. Tannen, D. (1989). Interpreting interruption in conversation. In Papers from the 25th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Part 2. Parasession on Language and Context (pp. 266-287). Chicago: University of Chicago
32. Tannen, D. (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 57- 76). New York: Oxford University Press
33. Wadensjo, C. (1992). Interpreting as interaction: On dialogue-interpreting in immigration hearings and medical encounters. Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences, Linköping University