Confucian Commentary and Chinese Intellectual History

Journal of Asian Studies

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 397-422

  Gardner, Daniel K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937260112     PISSN: 00219118     EISSN: 17520401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2658830     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Balazs, Etienne. 1964. “Nihilistic Revolt or Mystical Escapism.” In Chinese Civilization and Bureaucracy, translated by H. M. Wright. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
2. Brokaw, Cynthia J. 1994. “Tai Chen and Learning in the Confucian Tradition.” In Education and Society in Late Imperial China, 1600–1900, edited by Benjamin Elman and Alexander Woodside. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Cherniack, Susan. 1994. “Book Culture and Textual Transmission in Sung China.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 54(1): 5–125.
4. Chin Chung-Shu. 1964. “Pei-Sung k'o-chü chih-tu yen-chiu (shang).” Hsin-ya hsüeh-pao 6(1): 205–281.
5. Cho Chung-Hsin. 1969. Lun-yü Ho-shih chi-chieh Chu-tzu chi-chu pi-chiao yen-chiu. Taipei: Chia-hsin shu-ni kung-ssu.
6. Chou Yü-t'ung. 1983. Chou Yü-t'ung ching-hsüeh shih lun-chu hsüan-chi. Shanghai: Jen-min ch'u-pan she.Chu-tzu yü-lei. 1880. Ch'uan ching t'ang ed.
7. Chung-yung. References are to standard chapter and verse numbers. See Legge 1871, vol. 1, The Doctrine of the Mean.
8. Chung-yung chang-chü. In Ssu-shu chi-chu. Ssu-pu pei-yao.
9. CTYL. See Chu-tzu yü-lei.
10. Cutler, Norman. 1992. “Interpreting Tirukkural: The Role of Commentary in the Creation of a Text.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 112(4): 549–566.
11. de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1981. Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1989. The Message of the Mind in Neo-Confucianism. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. de Bary, Wm. Theodore., ed. 1975. The Unfolding of Neo-Confucianism. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Fraade, Steven D. 1991. From Tradition to Commentary: Torah and Its Interpretation in the Midrash Sifre to Deuteronomy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. Chu Hsi and the Ta-hsueh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon. Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
16. Gardner, Daniel K. 1991. “Modes of Thinking and Modes of Discourse in the Sung: Some Thoughts on the Yü-lu (‘Recorded Conversations’) Texts.” The Journal of Asian Studies 50(3): 574–603.
17. Goodrich, L. Carrington, ed. 1976. Dictionary of Ming Biography. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Gruenwald, Ithamar. 1993. “Midrash and the ‘Midrashic Condition’: Preliminary Considerations.” In The Midrashic Imagination: Jewish Exegesis, Thought, and History, edited by Michael Fishbane. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. Guy, R. Kent. 1987. The Emperor's Four Treasuries: Scholars and the State in the Late Ch'ien-Lung Era. Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
20. Han shu. Pan Ku. 1962. Peking: Chung-hua shu-chü.
21. Henderson, John. 1991. Scripture, Canon, and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. Hervouet, Yves, ed. 1978. A Sung Bibliography. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
23. Holtz, Barry W. 1984. “Midrash.” In Back to the Sources: Reading the Classic Jewish Texts, edited by Barry W. Holtz. New York: Summit Books.
24. Hou Han shu. Fan Yeh. 1965. Peking: Chung-hua shu-chü.
25. Hui-an hsien-sheng Chu Wen-kung wen-chi. Ssu-pu ts'ung-k'an.
26. Kermode, Frank. 1975. The Classic. New York: Viking Press.
27. Kieschnick, John. 1992. “Analects 12.1 and the Commentarial Tradition.”Journal of the American Oriental Society 112(4): 567–576.
28. Kramers, R. P. 1986. “The Development of the Confucian Schools.” In The Cambridge History of China, edited by Denis Twitchett and Michael Loewe. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kramers, R. P., trans. 1950. K'ung Tzu Chia Yü: The School Sayings of Confucius. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
30. Lee, Thomas. 1985. Government Education and Examinations in Sung China. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
31. Legge, James, trans. [1871] 1960. The Chinese Classics. 5 vols. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
32. Legge, James. 1885. The Li Ki. Vol. 2 (Vol. 28 in The Sacred Books of the East, edited by F. Max Müller). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Li chi. 1815. Shih-san ching chu-shu ed.
34. Lun-yü. [1940] 1966. Harvard-Yenching Sinological Index Series, supplement no. 16. Taipei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center.
35. Lun-yü chi-chieh. 1815. Shih-san ching chu-shu ed.
36. Lun-yü chi-chu. In Ssu-shu chi-chu. Ssu-pu pei-yao.
37. Lynn, Richard, trans. 1994. The Classic of Changes: A New Translation of the I Ching as Interpreted by Wang Bi. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. McMullen, David. 1988. State and Scholars in Tang China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Makeham, John. 1994. Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
40. Makeham, John. 1997. “The Earliest Extant Commentary on Lttnyu: Lunyu Zheng shi zhu.” Toting Pao 83: 260–299.
41. Ma Tsung-Huo. 1972. Chung-kuo ching-hsüeh shih. Taipei: Commercial Press.
42. Meng-tzu. [1941] 1966. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, supplement no. 17. Taipei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center.
43. Nylan, Michael. 1994. “The Chin Wen/Ku Wen Controversy in Han Times.” T'oung Pao 80: 83–145.
44. P'ei P'u-Hsien. 1969. Ching-hsüeh kai-shu. Taipei: K'ai-ming shu-tien.
45. P'i Hsi-jui. 1974. Ching-hsüeh li-shih. Reprint, Taipei: Ho-lo t'u-shu ch'u-pan she.
46. Sailey, Jay. 1978. The Master Who Embraces Simplicity: A Study of the Philosopher Ko Hung, a.d. 283–343. San Francisco: Chinese Materials Center, Inc.
47. Shang shu. 1815. Shih-san ching chu-shu ed.
48. Smith, Kidder, Jr., et al., eds. 1990. Sung Dynasty Uses of the I Ching. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49. Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1980. “The True Meaning of Scripture: An Empirical Historian's Nonreductionist Interpretation of the Qur'an.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 11(4): 487–505.
50. Sui shu. Wei Cheng, et al. 1973. Peking: Chung-hua shu-chü.
51. Ta-hsüeh. References are to standard chapter and verse numbers. See Gardner 1986 and Legge 1871, Vol. 1, Confucian Analects.
52. Tai Chün-jen. 1981. “Huang K'an Lun-yü i-shu te nei-han ssu-hsiang.” In Lun-Meng yen-chiu lun-chi, edited by Ch'ien Mu. Taipei: Li-ming wen-hua shih-yeh kung-ssu.
53. Van Zoeren, Steven. 1991. Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
54. Wang Hui-min. 1981. “Ho Yen Lun-yü chi-chieh k'ao-pien.” In Lun-Meng yen-chiu lun-chi, edited by Ch'ien Mu. Taipei: Li-ming wen-hua shih-yeh kung-ssu.
55. Wechsler, Howard J. 1985. Offerings of Jade and Silk: Ritual and Symbol in the Legitimation of the Tang Dynasty. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
56. Williamson, H. R. 1937. Wang An Shih: Chinese Statesman and Educationalist of the Sung Dynasty. Vol. 1. London: Arthur Probsthain.