Pluralism within the limits of reason alone? Habermas and the discursive negotiation of consensus

Pluralism and Liberal Neutrality

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 117-136

  Ashenden, Samantha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937258695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781315037158-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. J. Rawls, ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14 (summer 1985)
2. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York, Columbia University Press, 1993).
3. N. Rescher, Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993).
4. J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W Rehg (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996).
5. J. Kekes, The Morality of Pluralism (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993).
6. C. Larmore, The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
7. J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Vol.1, trans. T. McCarthy (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1984)
8. J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, The Critique of Functionalist Reason, Vol.2 trans. T. McCarthy (Cambridge, Polity, 1987).
9. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1, p.86.
10. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, p. 124.
11. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1, p.141.
12. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.97.
13. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, p. 152.
14. J. Habermas, ‘A Reply to My Critics’ in J. B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1982).
15. N. Fraser, Unruly Practices (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1989)
16. A. Honneth, The Critique of Power (Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1991).
17. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, p.357.
18. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1, p.270.
19. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, p.358.
20. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, p.359.
21. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, p.364.
22. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, p.364.
23. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, p.361.
24. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, p.326.
25. J. Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking, trans. W. M. Hohengarten (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992), p.140.
26. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.97.
27. J. Habermas, Justification and Application, trans. C. Cronin (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1993), p.32
28. J. Habermas, Justification and Application, trans. C. Cronin (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1993), p.31.
29. J. Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. W Nicholson (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990), p.104.
30. Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, p. 103.
31. Habermas, Justification and Application, p.48.
32. Habermas, Justification and Application, p.24.
33. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.107.
34. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp.108-109.
35. C. Gould, ‘Diversity and Democracy: Representing Differences’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1996).
36. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.288.
37. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp.185, 285, 311.
38. Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking, p.136.
39. J. Habermas, ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’ in C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1992).
40. J. Habermas, Autonomy and Solidarity, P. Dews (ed.) (London, Verso, 1992), p.260.
41. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.308
42. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.308.
43. J. Habermas, ‘Law and Morality: Two Lectures’, Sterling M. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures VIII (University of Utah Press, 1987).
44. Q. Skinner, ‘Two views on the maintenance of liberty’ in P. Pettit (ed.), Contemporary Political Theory (New York, Macmillan, 1991).
45. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.414. p.414.
46. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.195.
47. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp.194-5.
48. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp. 221, 418-19, 429.
49. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.419.
50. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp. 397, 401.
51. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.419, pp.408-409.
52. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp.83, 122.
53. Benhabib ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1996)
54. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.307.
55. K. Baynes, ‘Democracy and the Rechstaat: Habermas’s Faktizitat und Geltun’, in S. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995).
56. Habermas, ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’, p.449.
57. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.42.
58. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.433.
59. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.79.
60. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.415.
61. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.416.
62. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.410.
63. I. M. Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990).
64. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.425.
65. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.426.
66. A. Phillips, The Politics of Presence (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995).
67. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.310.
68. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.282.
69. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.282.
70. Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, p.57.
71. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp. 313-14.
72. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p.314.
73. T. McCarthy, ‘Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue’, Ethics, 105 (October 1994), p.49.
74. J. Habermas, ‘Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State’, in A. Gutman and C. Taylor (eds.), Multiculturalism (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994), p.134.
75. Habermas, Justification and Application, p.59.
76. Habermas, Justification and Application, p.60.
77. J. Habermas, 1988, quoted in D. M. Rasmussen, Reading Habermas (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990), p.69.
78. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp. 322-23
79. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, p. 185
80. J. Tully, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995).
81. Habermas, ‘Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State’, p. 132.