Complications of low compared to standard pneumoperitoneum pressures in laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic pathology: A systematic review protocol

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Kyle, Esther B ^a,b   Maheux Lacroix, Sarah ^a,b   Boutin, Amélie ^b   Lemyre, Madeleine ^a,b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT TUMOR; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); ORGAN INJURY; OXYGEN DESATURATION; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ABDOMEN; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ARTIFICIAL PNEUMOPERITONEUM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

ABDOMEN; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; PRESSURE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84937231031     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0091-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF. Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):596-601. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec903.
2. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006(4):Cd006231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd006231.
3. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009(3):Cd003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
4. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(7):1121-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9166-7.
5. la Chapelle CF, Bemelman WA, Rademaker BM, van Barneveld TA, Jansen FW. A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery.: Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(3):271-82. doi: 10.1007/s10397-012-0731-y.
6. Cunningham AJ. Anesthetic implications of laparoscopic surgery. Yale J Biol Med. 1998;71(6):551-78.
7. Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:Cd006930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub3.
8. Hua J, Gong J, Yao L, Zhou B, Song Z. Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014;208(1):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.027.
9. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (London, England). 2010;8(5):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
11. Glanville JM, Lefebvre C, Miles JN, Camosso-Stefinovic J. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(2):130-6.
12. Wong SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(4):451-5.
13. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
15. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39(7):949-55.
16. Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese. Ann Surg. 2005;241(2):219-26.
17. Russo A, Marana E, Viviani D, Polidori L, Colicci S, Mettimano M, et al. Diastolic function: the influence of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(11):923-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832cb3c9.
18. Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(4):455-8.
19. Henny CP, Hofland J. Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(9):1163-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2250-z.