Subject-clitic inversion and inflectional hierarchies

Journal of French Language Studies

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 181-209

  Jones, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937186973     PISSN: 09592695     EISSN: 14740079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0959269500004683     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baker, M. C. (1988) Incorporation. University of Chicago Press.
2. Benincà, P. and C. Poletto (1997) Romance do-support. Paper presented at the ‘Going Romance XI’ conference, Groningen, December 1997.
3. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Drijkoningen, F. (1990) Functional heads and the unification of French word order. Probus 2.3: 291–320.
7. Grimshaw, J. (1997) Projection, Heads and Optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28.3: 373–422.
8. Hulk, A.C.J. (1993) Residual V2 and the licensing of functional features. Probus 5: 127–154.
9. Jones, M. A. (1996) Foundations of French Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
10. Jones, M. A. (1997) French complex inversion and articulated clause structure. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 17: 1–18.
11. Jones, M. A. (1998) On covert movement. In: If you see what I mean: Essays on language, presented to Keith Brown on the occasion of his retirement in 1995 (special issue of Essex Research Reports in Linguistics), pp. 34–48. University of Essex.
12. Katamba, F. (1993) Morphology. London: Macmillan.
13. Kayne, R. S. (1972) Subject inversion in French interrogatives. In: J. Casagrande and B. Saciuk (eds), Generative Studies in Romance Languages. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, pp. 70–126.
14. Kayne, R. S. (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris: Dordrecht.
15. Kayne, R. S. (1995) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. Kayne, R. S. and J-Y. Pollock (1978) Stylistic Inversion, Successive Cyclicity and Move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9.4: 595–621.
17. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche (1991) The position of subjects. Lingua 85: 211–258.
18. Obenauer, H-G. (1976) Études de syntaxe interrogative du Français: ‘quoi’, ‘combien’ et le complémenteur. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
19. Rizzi, L. and I. Roberts (1989) Complex inversion in French. Probus 1: 1–30.
20. Roberts, I. (1998) Case and inversion in the history of French. Ms. University of Stuttgart.
21. Sportiche, D. (1994) Subject clitics in French and Romance complex inversion and clitic doubling. Ms. UCLA (to appear in K.Johnson and I. Roberts (eds.), Studies in Comparative Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluvver).
22. Valois, D. and F. Dupuis (1992) On the status of (verbal) traces in French, the case of stylistic inversion. In: P. Hirschbuhler and K. Koerner (eds), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Tlieory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 325–338.
23. Wind, M. de, (1994) Against V-to-C in French complex inversion. In: M. L. Mazzola (ed.) Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 271–284.
24. Wind, M. de, (1995) Inversion in French. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 15, University of Groningen.