메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 225-240

The rise of case suffixes as discourse markers in Jingulu—a case study of innovation in an obsolescent language

(1)  Pensalfini, Rob a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84937186044     PISSN: 07268602     EISSN: 14692996     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07268609908599582     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (26)

References (20)
  • 6
    • 84926273029 scopus 로고
    • Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: the anatomy of a flat language
    • Blake, B. 1983. ‘Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: the anatomy of a flat language’. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 3: 143–175.
    • (1983) Australian Journal of Linguistics , vol.3 , pp. 143-175
    • Blake, B.1
  • 8
    • 84995340210 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Spracherhaltung in der Beiz—Das Überleben von der Walsersprache zu Pomatt/Formazza
    • Dal Negro, S. 1998. ‘Spracherhaltung in der Beiz—Das Überleben von der Walsersprache zu Pomatt/Formazza’. Wir Walser, 36(1): 13–16.
    • (1998) Wir Walser , vol.36 , Issue.1 , pp. 13-16
    • Dal Negro, S.1
  • 11
    • 85066175224 scopus 로고
    • Unpublished field notes
    • Hale, K. 1960. “ ‘Djingilu’ ”. Unpublished field notes
    • (1960) Djingilu
    • Hale, K.1
  • 13
    • 54549093359 scopus 로고
    • Estonian among immigrants in Sweden
    • Dorian N.C., (ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,. Edited by
    • Maandi, K. 1989. “ ‘Estonian among immigrants in Sweden’ ”. In Investigating Obsolesce: studies in language contraction and death, Edited by: Dorian, NC. 227–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • (1989) Investigating Obsolesce: studies in language contraction and death , pp. 227-241
    • Maandi, K.1
  • 15
    • 0009097162 scopus 로고
    • Is basic word order universal?
    • Tomlin R., (ed), Amsterdam: John Benjamins,. Edited by
    • Mithun, M. 1987. “ ‘Is basic word order universal?’ ”. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, Edited by: Tomlin, R. 281–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • (1987) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse , pp. 281-328
    • Mithun, M.1
  • 16
    • 79959276148 scopus 로고
    • Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar
    • Nichols, J. 1986. ‘Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar’. Language, 62: 56–119.
    • (1986) Language , vol.62 , pp. 56-119
    • Nichols, J.1
  • 17
    • 4043089346 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Working Papers Linguistics, Doctoral dissertation
    • Pensalfini, R. 1997. “ ‘Jingulu grammar, dictionary, and texts’ ”. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Doctoral dissertation
    • (1997) Jingulu grammar, dictionary, and texts
    • Pensalfini, R.1
  • 18
    • 85066204666 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards a typology of nonconfigurationality
    • preparation
    • Pensalfini, R. 1999. ‘Towards a typology of nonconfigurationality’. NLLT, (in preparation)
    • (1999) NLLT
    • Pensalfini, R.1
  • 20
    • 85066178978 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The ideas in this paper owe a lot to discussions I have had with colleagues, teachers, and students. I would particularly like to thank Nancy Dorian, Patrick McConvell, Ken Hale, Danny Fox, Jonathan Bobaljik, liana Mushin, Jerry Sadock, and Kathryn Flack, as well as audience members at the 1996 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. I was partially supported in my work by a Hackett Studentship from the University of Western Australia, and my fieldwork was supported in a number of ways by the Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Papulu Apparr-kari, Diwurruwurru-jaru, the Institute for Aboriginal Development and Gurungu Council. Abbreviations used in glosses:1, 2, 3 first, second, third personsg, dl, pl singular, dual, plural numberinc, exc inclusive, exclusive referenceS, O, Obj subject, object, objectm, f, n, v masculine, feminine, neuter, vegetable genderNOM, ACC, ERG, DAT, GEN nominative, accusative, ergative, dative, genitive caseLOC, ALL locative, allative role/caseFOC contrastive focus/discourse prominenceDEM demonstrativeFUT, dist future, distant past tenseHAB habitual aspectIRR, IMPV irrealis, imperative moodINV, REFL inverse, reflexive morphemeNOML nominalising suffix
    • The ideas in this paper owe a lot to discussions I have had with colleagues, teachers, and students. I would particularly like to thank Nancy Dorian, Patrick McConvell, Ken Hale, Danny Fox, Jonathan Bobaljik, liana Mushin, Jerry Sadock, and Kathryn Flack, as well as audience members at the 1996 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. I was partially supported in my work by a Hackett Studentship from the University of Western Australia, and my fieldwork was supported in a number of ways by the Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Papulu Apparr-kari, Diwurruwurru-jaru, the Institute for Aboriginal Development and Gurungu Council. Abbreviations used in glosses:1, 2, 3 first, second, third personsg, dl, pl singular, dual, plural numberinc, exc inclusive, exclusive referenceS, O, Obj subject, object, objectm, f, n, v masculine, feminine, neuter, vegetable genderNOM, ACC, ERG, DAT, GEN nominative, accusative, ergative, dative, genitive caseLOC, ALL locative, allative role/caseFOC contrastive focus/discourse prominenceDEM demonstrativeFUT, dist future, distant past tenseHAB habitual aspectIRR, IMPV irrealis, imperative moodINV, REFL inverse, reflexive morphemeNOML nominalising suffix


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.