Combining individual and group supervision in educating for the social work profession

Clinical Supervisor

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 73-89

  Walter, Carolyn A ^a   Young, Thomas M ^a  

^a WIDENER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Group supervision; Learning; Professional development; Supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937180507     PISSN: 07325223     EISSN: 1545231X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J001v18n02_06     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altheide, D. L., and Johnson, J. M., 1994. “Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research”. In Handbook of qualitative research, Edited by:Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 485–99. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
2. Bogo, M., 1993. The student/field instructor relationship:The critical factor in field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 11:23–36.
3. Bogo, M., and Vayda, E., 1998. The practice of field instruction in social work, NY:Columbia University Press.
4. Grossman, B., Levine-Jordano, N., and Shearer, P., 1990. Working with students' emotional reactions in the field:An educational framework. The Clinical Supervisor, 8:23–39.
5. Haber, R., 1996. Dimensions of psychotherapy supervision, NY:W. W. Norton & Co.
6. Kadushin, A., 1985. Supervision in social work, 2nd ed., NY:Columbia University Press.
7. Jacobs, D., David, P., and Meyer, D., 1995. The supervisory encounter, New Haven:Yale University Press.
8. Kaplan, T., 1988. Group field instruction:Rationale and practical application. Social Work with Groups, 11:125–143.
9. Munson, C., 1981. Style and structure in supervision. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17:65–72.
10. Saari, C., 1986. Concepts of learning through supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 4:63–78.
11. Sales, E., and Navarre, E., 1970. Individual and group supervision in field instruction, Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan School of Social Work.
12. Shulman, L., 1993. Interactional supervision, Washington, DC:National Association of Social Workers.
13. Taft, J., 1950. A conception of the growth process underlying social casework practice. Social Casework, 31:311–18.
14. Tebb, S., Manning, D., and Klaumann, T., 1996. A renaissance of group supervision in practicum. The Clinical Supervisor, 14:39–51.
15. Towle, C., 1954. The learner in education for the professions, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
16. van Kessel, L., and Haan, D., 1993. The Dutch concept of supervision:Its essential characteristics as a conceptual framework. The Clinical Supervisor, 11:5–27.
17. Waldfogel, D., 1983. “Supervision of students and practitioners”. In Handbook of clinical social work, Edited by:Rosenblatt, A., and Waldfogel, D., 319–44. San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass.
18. Walter, C., and Sadtler, L., 1997. The role of the field liaison in identifying learning/teaching styles to facilitate student learning. Arete, 21:50–60.
19. Wijnberg, M. H., and Schwartz, M. C., 1977. Models of student supervision:The apprentice, growth, and role systems models. Journal of Education for Social Wo r k, 13:107–113.
20. Young, T., 1994. Collaboration of a public child welfare agency and a school of social work:A clinical group supervision project. Child Welfare, LXXIII:659–71. (January)