Retrospective Analysis of Interobserver Spatial Variability in the Localization of Broca's and Wernicke's Areas Using Three Different fMRI Language Paradigms

Journal of Neuroimaging

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 626-633

  Black, David F ^a   Delone, David R ^a   Kaufmann, Timothy J ^a   Fitz Gibbon, Patrick D ^a   Carter, Rickey E ^a   Machulda, Mary M ^a   Welker, Kirk M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Broca's area; FMRI; Language lateralization; Wernicke's area

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; DISPERSION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WADA TEST; WERNICKE AREA; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN MAPPING; BROCA AREA; CHILD; INTRAOPERATIVE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; BROCA AREA; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; WERNICKE AREA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937073364     PISSN: 10512284     EISSN: 15526569     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12179     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arora J, Pugh K, Westerveld M, et al. Language lateralization in epilepsy patients: fMRI validated with the Wada procedure. Epilepsia 2009;50:2225-2241.
2. Peck KK, Bradbury M, Petrovich N, et al. Presurgical evaluation of language using functional magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumor patients with previous surgery. Neurosurgery 2009;64:644-652; discussion 652-643.
3. Weber B, Wellmer J, Schur S, et al. Presurgical language fMRI in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: Effects of task performance. Epilepsia 2006;47(5):880-886.
4. Spreer JS, Arnold SA, Quiske AQ, et al. Determination of hemisphere dominance for language: comparison of frontal and temporal fMRI activation with intracarotid amytal testing. Neuroradiology 2002;44:467-474.
5. Ruge MI, Victor J, Hosain S, et al. Concordance between functional magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative language mapping. Stereo Funct Neurosurg 1999;72:95-102.
6. Stippich C, Rapps N, Dreyhaupt J, et al. Localizing and lateralizing language in patients with brain tumors: feasibility of routine preoperative functional MR imaging in 81 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:828-836.
7. Rutten GJM, Ramsey NF, Van Rijen PC, et al. Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol for intraoperative localization of critical temporoparietal language areas. Ann Neurol 2002;51:350-360.
8. Schulder M, Maldjian JA, Liu W, et al. Functional MRI-guided surgery of intracranial tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1997;68:98-105.
9. Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Pegna AJ, et al. Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects. Human Brain Mapp 2004;23:140-155.
10. Burton MW, Noll DC, Small SL. The anatomy of auditory word processing: individual variability. Brain Language 2001;77:119-131.
11. Pillai JJ. The evolution of clinical functional imaging during the past 2 decades and its current impact on neurosurgical planning. Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:219-225.
12. Benke T, Koylu B, Visani P, et al. Language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between fMRI and the Wada Test. Epilepsia 2006;47:1308-1319.
13. Gaillard WD, Balsamo L, Xu B, et al. fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology 2004;63:1403-1408.
14. Ramsey NF, Sommer IE, Rutten GJ, et al. Combined analysis of language tasks in fMRI improves assessment of hemispheric dominance for language functions in individual subjects. Neuroimage 2001;13:719-733.
15. Thulborn KR. Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:37-50.
16. Zaca D, Nickerson JP, Deib G, et al. Effectiveness of four different clinical fMRI paradigms for preoperative regional determination of language lateralization in patients with brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1015-1025.
17. Ashtari M, Perrine K, Elbaz R, et al. Mapping the functional anatomy of sentence comprehension and application to presurgical evaluation of patients with brain tumor. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1461-1468.
18. Haberg A, Kvistad KA, Unsgard G, et al. Preoperative blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with primary brain tumors: clinical application and outcome. Neurosurgery 2004;54:902-914; discussion 914-905.
19. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 2000;23:315-341.
20. Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of Language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002;25:151-188.
21. Hund-Georgiadis M, Lex U, von Cramon DY. Language dominance assessment by means of fMRI: contributions from task design, performance, and stimulus modality. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:668-675.
22. Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, et al. Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996;46:978-984.
23. Medina LS, Bernal B, Ruiz J. Role of functional MR in determining language dominance in epilepsy and nonepilepsy populations: a Bayesian analysis. Radiology 2007;242:94-100.
24. Yetkin FZ, Swanson S, Fischer M, et al. Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results. Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1095-1098.
25. FitzGerald DB, Cosgrove GR, Ronner S, et al. Location of language in the cortex: a comparison between functional MR imaging and electrocortical stimulation. Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1529-1539.
26. Petrovich N, Holodny AI, Tabar V, et al. Discordance between functional magnetic resonance imaging during silent speech tasks and intraoperative speech arrest. J Neurosurg 2005;103:267-274.
27. Fernández G, Specht K, Weis S, et al. Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI. Neurology 2003;60:969-975.
28. Kurland J, Naeser MA, Baker EH, et al. Test-retest reliability of fMRI during nonverbal semantic decisions in moderate-severe nonfluent aphasia patients. Behav Neurol 2004;15:87-97.
29. Harrington GS, Buonocore MH, Farias ST. Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:938-944.
30. Rutten GJM, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, et al. Reproducibility of fMRI-determined language lateralization in individual subjects. Brain Language 2002;80:421-437.
31. Niskanen E, Kononen M, Villberg V, et al. The effect of fMRI task combinations on determining the hemispheric dominance of language functions. Neuroradiology 2012;54:393-405.
32. Deblaere KD, Backes WB, Hofman PH, et al. Developing a comprehensive presurgical functional MRI protocol for patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: a pilot study. Neuroradiology 2002;44:667-673.
33. Sanjuan A, Bustamante JC, Forn C, et al. Comparison of two fMRI tasks for the evaluation of the expressive language function. Neuroradiology 2010;52:407-415.