An Early Warning Scoring System to Identify Septic Patients in the Prehospital Setting: The PRESEP Score

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 868-871

  Bayer, Ole ^a   Schwarzkopf, Daniel ^b   Stumme, Christoph ^a   Stacke, Angelika ^a   Hartog, Christiane S ^a,b   Hohenstein, Christian ^c   Kabisch, Björn ^a   Reichel, Jens ^a   Reinhart, Konrad ^a,b   Winning, Johannes ^a  

^a Intensive Care Medicine   (Germany)

^b Center for Sepsis Control and Care   (Germany)

^c JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREATHING RATE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EMERGENCY WARD; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INFECTION SENSITIVITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MODIFIED EARLY WARNING SCORE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREHOSPITAL EARLY SEPSIS DETECTION SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ROBSON SCREENING TOOL; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; YOUDEN INDEX; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPSIS; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

EID: 84937024356     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12707     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Wang HE, Weaver MD, Shapiro NI, Yealy DM,. Opportunities for emergency medical services care of sepsis. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 193-7.
2. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L,. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. Q J Med 2001; 94: 521-6.
3. Robson W, Nutbeam T, Daniels R,. Sepsis: a need for prehospital intervention? Emerg Med J 2009; 26: 535-8.
4. Wallgren UM, Castrén M, Svensson AE, Kurland L,. Identification of adult septic patients in the prehospital setting: a comparison of two screening tools and clinical judgment. Eur J Emerg Med 2014; 21: 260-5.
5. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al., Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992; 101: 1644-55.
6. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al., Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 165-228.
7. Austin PC, Tu JV,. Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models. Am Statistician 2004; 58: 131-7.
8. Teasdale G, Jennet B,. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-4.
9. Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G, et al., Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 1749-55.
10. Studnek JR, Artho M, Garner CL, Jones AE,. The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30: 51-6.