Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 102, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1026-1036

  Huttner F J ^a   Koessler Ebs, J ^a   Hackert, T ^a   Ulrich, A ^a   Buchler M W ^a   Diener, M K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84937022449     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9819     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z'graggen K,. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1310-1314.
2. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 246-253.
3. Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S, Strobel O, Schneider L, Hartwig W, et al. Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 1197-1203.
4. Crippa S, Boninsegna L, Partelli S, Falconi M,. Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010; 17: 782-787.
5. Sauvanet A., [ Surgical complications of pancreatectomy.] J Chir (Paris) 2008; 145: 103-114.
6. Talamini MA, Moesinger R, Yeo CJ, Poulose B, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, et al. Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation? Ann Surg 1998; 227: 896-903.
7. Carbognin G, Zamboni G, Pinali L, Chiara ED, Girardi V, Salvia R, et al. Branch duct IPMTs: value of cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of biological behavior and follow-up. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31: 320-325.
8. Kiely JM, Nakeeb A, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Pitt HA,. Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect? J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 890-897.
9. Spinelli KS, Fromwiller TE, Daniel RA, Kiely JM, Nakeeb A, Komorowski RA, et al. Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: observe or operate. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 651-657.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med 2009; 3: e123-e130.
11. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13.
12. Downs SH, Black N,. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 377-384.
13. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I,. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13.
14. Correnti S, Liverani A, Antonini G, Paganelli MT, Mercati U,. Intraoperative ultrasonography for pancreatic insulinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43: 207-211.
15. Marubayashi S, Tanaka T, Shimizu Y, Matugu Y, Fukuma K, Okada K, et al. Tumor localization studies and surgical treatment in patients with insulinoma. Hiroshima J Med Sci 1998; 47: 69-72.
16. Shimizu S, Tanaka M, Konomi H, Mizumoto K, Yamaguchi K,. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: current indications and surgical results. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 402-406.
17. Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Halpin VJ, et al. Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 579-586.
18. Casanova D, Polavieja MG, Naranjo A, Pardo F, Rotellar F, Gonzalez F, et al. Surgical treatment of persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (PHH) (insulinoma and nesidioblastosis). Langenbecks Arch Surg 2007; 392: 663-670.
19. Goh BK, Ooi LL, Cheow PC, Tan YM, Ong HS, Chung YF, et al. Accurate preoperative localization of insulinomas avoids the need for blind resection and reoperation: analysis of a single institution experience with 17 surgically treated tumors over 19 years. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 1071-1077.
20. Jablonska B, Dranka-Bojarowska D, Palacz H, Lewiński A, Lampe P,. Surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours-clinical experience. Pol Przegl Chir 2011; 83: 216-222.
21. Zhang T, Mu Y, Qu L, Wang X, Lv Z, Du J, et al. Accurate combined preoperative localization of insulinomas aid the choice for enucleation: a single institution experience over 25 years. Hepatogastroenterology 2012; 59: 1282-1285.
22. Hwang HK, Park JS, Kim JK, Park CM, Cho SI, Yoon DS,. Comparison of efficacy of enucleation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for small (< 3 cm) branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm located at the head of pancreas and the uncinate process. Yonsei Med J 2012; 53: 106-110.
23. Haugvik SP, Marangos IP, Rosok BI, Pomianowska E, Gladhaug IP, Mathisen O, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Surg 2013; 37: 582-590.
24. Bassi C, Salvia R, Molinari E, Biasutti C, Falconi M, Pederzoli P,. Management of 100 consecutive cases of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: wait for symptoms and see at imaging or vice versa? World J Surg 2003; 27: 319-323.
25. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Veronesi P, Cristallo M, Di Carlo V,. Surgical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreatic body. Dig Surg 2003; 20: 506-510.
26. Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Levi S, López-Boado MA, Navarro S,. Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1607-1621.
27. Luo Y, Liu R, Hu MG, Mu YM, An LC, Huang ZQ,. Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic insulinomas: a single-institution experience of 29 cases. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 945-950.
28. Casadei R, Ricci C, Rega D, D'Ambra M, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors less than 4 cm in diameter: resect or enucleate? a single-center experience. Pancreas 2010; 39: 825-828.
29. Turrini O, Schmidt CM, Pitt HA, Guiramand J, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Aboudi S, et al. Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreatic head/uncinate: resection or enucleation? HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13: 126-131.
30. Cauley CE, Pitt HA, Ziegler KM, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Zyromski NJ, et al. Pancreatic enucleation: improved outcomes compared to resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1347-1353.
31. Cherif R, Gaujoux S, Couvelard A, Dokmak S, Vuillerme MP, Ruszniewski P, et al. Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 2045-2055.
32. Busquets J, Fabregat J, Borobia FG, Jorba R, Valls C, Serrano T, et al. Organ-preserving surgery for benign lesions and low-grade malignancies of the pancreatic head: a matched case-control study. Surg Today 2010; 40: 125-131.
33. Kunz R, Oxman AD,. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998; 317: 1185-1190.
34. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 781-788.
35. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 786-795.
36. Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, McDonald T,. Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1138-1144.
37. Malalasekera AP, Ariyaratne MH, Fernando R, Perera D, Deen KI,. Cost accounting in a surgical unit in a teaching hospital-a pilot study. Ceylon Med J 2003; 48: 71-74.