Differentially private client-side data deduplication protocol for cloud storage services

Security and Communication Networks

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2114-2123

  Shin, Youngjoo ^a,b   Kim, Kwangjo ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cloud storage; Differential privacy; Information leakage resilient protocol; Secure data deduplication; Storage gateway

Indexed keywords

GATEWAYS (COMPUTER NETWORKS);

CLOUD STORAGE SERVICES; CLOUD STORAGES; DATA DE DUPLICATIONS; DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACIES; EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; INFORMATION LEAKAGE; SECURE DATA DEDUPLICATION; SENSITIVE INFORMATIONS;

DIGITAL STORAGE;

EID: 84937000951     PISSN: 19390114     EISSN: 19390122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sec.1159     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Russell D. Data deduplication will be even bigger in 2010. Gartner 2010. Available at: http://www.gartner.com/doc/1297513 [accessed on 24 March 2014].
2. Harnik D, Pinkas B, Shulman-Peleg A. Side chan- nels in cloud services: deduplication in cloud storage. IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine 2010; 8:40-47.
3. Mulazzani M, Schrittwieser S, Leithner M, Huber M, Weippl E. Dark clouds on the horizon: using cloud storage as attack vector and online slack space, Proceedings of USENIX Security Symposium (SEC'11), San Francisco, CA, 2011; 65-76.
4. Lee S, Choi D. Privacy-preserving cross-user source-based data deduplication in cloud storage, Proceedings of International Conference on ICT Convergence, Jeju, Korea, 2012; 329-330.
5. Olivier, Neumann C, Montalvo L, Defrance S. Improving the resistance to side-channel attacks on cloud storage services, Proceedings of International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS'12), Istanbul, Turkey, 2012; 1-5.
6. Zaffos S, Couture A. Hybrid cloud gateway appliances expand cloud storage use cases, Gartner 2011, Available at: http://www.gartner.com/doc/1516718 [accessed on 24 March 2014].
7. Dwork C, McSherry F, Nissim K, Smith A. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis, Proceedings of Conference on Theory of Cryptography (TCC'06), LNCS, vol. 3876, New York, NY, 2006; 265-284.
8. Dwork C. Differential privacy: a survey of results, Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, LNCS, vol. 4978, Xi'an, China, 2008; 1-19.
9. Dwork C, Smith A. Differential privacy for statistics: what we know and what we want to learn. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 2010; 1(2):135-154.
10. Sweeney L. k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 2002; 10(5):557-570.
11. Narayanan A, Shmatikov V. Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets, Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP'08), Oakland, CA, 2008; 111-125.
12. Fahl S, Harbach M, Muders T, Baumgärtner L, Freisleben B, Smith M. Why eve and mallory love android: an analysis of android ssl (in)security, Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS'12), Raleigh, NC, 2012; 50-61.
13. Krawczyk H, Paterson KG, Wee H. On the security of the tls protocol: a systematic analysis, Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO'13, LNCS, vol. 8042, Santa Barbara, CA, 2013; 429-448.