Viewpoint: Why Disclosure Matters

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 7527-7528

  Oreskes, Naomi ^a   Carlat, Daniel ^b   Mann, Michael E ^c   Thacker, Paul D ^d   Vom Saal, Frederick S ^e  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Missouri Columbia ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA INTERPRETATION; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; WATER QUALITY;

FUNDING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NONHUMAN; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 84936970714     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02726     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Lundh, A., Sismondo, S., Lexchin, J., Busuioc, O. A., and Bero, L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; 12:MR000033. dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2.
2. Vom Saal, et al. Letter to the Editor: Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research. Toxicol. Sci. 2010, 115 (2)), 612-613; DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq048.
3. http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2801%2900660-X/abstract.
4. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/full/435737a.html.
5. http://insideclimatenews.org/news/06042015/fracking-study-water-contamination-under-ethics-review.