Clinical significance of barriers to blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients with insufficient glycemic control

Patient Preference and Adherence

Volumn 9, Issue , 2015, Pages 837-845

  Suzuki, Takeo ^a   Takei, Ryoko ^b   Inoguchi, Toyoshi ^b,c   Sonoda, Noriyuki ^b,c   Sasaki, Shuji ^b   Kaise, Toshihiko ^a   Takayanagi, Ryoichi ^b  

^a Development and Medical Affairs Division   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diabetic complications; Epidemiology; Patient awareness; Patient behavior; Patient education

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; JAPAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 84936952757     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1177889X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S84268     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes mellitus Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes mellitus (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 1364-1379.
2. Arakawa S, Watanabe T, Sone H, et al. The factors that affect exercise therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan: a nationwide survey. Diabetol Int. 2015; 6: 19-25.
3. Minet L, Møller S, Vach W, Wagner L, Henriksen JE. Mediating the effect of self-care management intervention in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of 47 randomised controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 80: 29-41.
4. Rachmani R, Levi Z, Slavachevski I, Avin M, Ravid M. Teaching patients to monitor their risk factors retards the progression of vascular complications in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-a randomized prospective study. Diabet Med. 2002; 19: 385-392.
5. Izumi K, Hayashino Y, Yamazaki K, et al. Multifaceted intervention to promote the regular visiting of patients with diabetes to primary care physicians: rationale, design and conduct of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-2 study protocol. Diabetol Int. 2010; 1: 83-89.
6. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Grants System. Japanese. The Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial. Available from: http://mhlw-grants. niph. go. jp/niph/search/NIDD00. do?resrchNum=201222025B. Accessed February 20, 2015.
7. Yoshioka N, Ishii H, Tajima N, Iwamoto Y; the DAWN Japan group. Differences in physician and patient perceptions about insulin therapy for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the DAWN Japan study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014; 30: 177-183.
8. The Japan Diabetes Society. Evidence-based Practice Guideline for the Treatment for Diabetes in Japan 2007. 2nd ed. Tokyo, Japan: Nankodo; 2007. Japanese.
9. Japan Association for Diabetes Education and Care. Japanese. The awareness survey on risks of complications in diabetes. Available from: http://www. nittokyo. or. jp/chousakenkyu_10004. html. Accessed February 20, 2015.
10. Mori A, Shiomi K, Kouno H, et al. About complications awareness in diabetic outpatients. J Jpn Diabetes Soc. 2011; 54 Suppl 1: S-S265. Japanese.