DNA mismatch repair status predicts need for future colorectal surgery for metachronous neoplasms in young individuals undergoing colorectal cancer resection

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 645-652

  Aronson, Melyssa ^a   Holter, Spring ^a   Semotiuk, Kara ^a   Winter, Laura ^a   Pollett, Aaron ^a   Gallinger, Steven ^a   Cohen, Zane ^a   Gryfe, Robert ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Lynch syndrome; Metachronous colorectal cancer; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch repair; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURGERY; CHILD; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FIRST DEGREE RELATIVE; FOLLOW UP; GENE MUTATION; HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL CANCER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METACHRONOUS COLORECTAL CANCER; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MISMATCH REPAIR; MUTATION; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLYPOSIS; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; AGE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS; GENETICS; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; PATHOLOGY; REGISTER; RISK FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CANADA; CHILD; COLECTOMY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS; DNA MISMATCH REPAIR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84936948743     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000391     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Canadian Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2013. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2013.
2. Bleyer A, Viny A, Barr, R. Introduction. In: Bleyer A, O'Leary M, Barr R, Ries LA G (eds). Cancer Epidemiology in Older Adolescents and Young Adults 15 to 29 Years of Age, Including SEER Incidence and Survival: 1975-2000. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD; 2006:1-14. NIH publication 06-5767.
3. Vasen HF, Blanco I, Aktan-Collan K, et al; Mallorca group. Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts. Gut. 2013;62:812-823.
4. Guillem JG, Wood WC, Moley JF, et al; ASCO; SSO. ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4642-4660.
5. Church J, Simmang C; Standards Task Force; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer and the Standards Committee of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of patients with dominantly inherited colorectal cancer (familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1001-1012.
6. Vasen HF, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH. Cancer: Lynch syndrome-how should colorectal cancer be managed? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:184-186.
7. Moreira L, Balaguer F, Lindor N, et al; EPICOLON Consortium. Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2012;308:1555-1565.
8. Park JG, Vasen HF, Park KJ, et al. Suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC) criteria and results of genetic diagnosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:710-715.
9. Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA, Ouwendijk RJ, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME. The incidence and risk factors of metachronous colorectal cancer: an indication for follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:522-531.
10. Parry S, Win AK, Parry B, et al. Metachronous colorectal cancer risk for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: the advantage of more extensive colon surgery. Gut. 2011;60:950-957.
11. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Lynch HT, Stanislav GV, et al. Recognition and treatment of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (Lynch syndromes I and II). Ann Surg. 1987;206:289-295.
12. De Vostot Nederveen Cappel WH, Nagengast FM, Griffioen G, et al. Surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a long-term study on 114 families. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1588-1594.
13. Kalady MF, McGannon E, Vogel JD, Manilich E, Fazio VW, Church JM. Risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma after colectomy for colorectal cancer in patients meeting Amsterdam criteria. Ann Surg. 2010;252:507-511.
14. Natarajan N, Watson P, Silva-Lopez E, Lynch HT. Comparison of extended colectomy and limited resection in patients with Lynch syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:77-82.
15. Schofield L, Watson N, Grieu F, et al. Population-based detection of Lynch syndrome in young colorectal cancer patients using microsatellite instability as the initial test. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1097-1102.
16. Perea J, Rueda D, Canal A, et al. Age at onset should be a major criterion for subclassification of colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:116-126.