Resource use assessment of an agricultural system from a life cycle perspective - a dairy farm as case study

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 135, Issue , 2015, Pages 77-89

  Huysveld, Sophie ^a,b   Van linden, Veerle ^a   De Meester, Steven ^b   Peiren, Nico ^a   Muylle, Hilde ^a   Lauwers, Ludwig ^a   Dewulf, Jo ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

CEENE; Dairy farm; Exergy; Life cycle assessment; Resource efficiency; Resource footprint

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DAIRY FARMING; DRY MATTER; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXERGY; FOSSIL FUEL; INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; METHANE; MILK PRODUCTION; NATURAL RESOURCE; PASTURE; RESOURCE USE;

BELGIUM; FLANDERS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84936929691     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alvarenga R.A.F., Dewulf J., Van Langenhove H., Huijbregts M.A.J. Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:939-947.
2. Andrew S.M., Waldo D.R., Erdman R.A. Direct analysis of body composition of dairy cows at three physiological stages. J. Dairy Sci 1994, 77:3022-3033.
3. Bardi U., El Asmar T., Lavacchi A. Turning electricity into food: the role of renewable energy in the future of agriculture. J. Clean. Prod 2013, 53:224-231.
4. Batte M.T., Arnholt M.W. Precision farming adoption and use in Ohio: case studies of six leading-edge adopters. Comput. Electron. Agric 2003, 38:125-139.
5. Bösch M.E., Hellweg S., Huijbregts M.A.J., Frischknecht R. Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2007, 12:181-190.
6. Castro-Montoya J., De Campeneere S., Van Ranst G., Fievez V. Interactions between methane mitigation additives and basal substrates on in vitro methane and VFA production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 2012, 176:47-60.
7. CEAS Consultants The environmental impact of dairy production in the EU: practical options for the improvement of the environmental impact Final report for the European Commission (DGXI). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/agriculture/pdf/dairy.pdf.
8. CIGR Climatization of animal houses. 4th Report of Working Group on: Heat and Moisture Production at Animal and House Levels 2002, DIAS, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences. http://www.cigr.org/documents/CIGR_4TH_WORK_GR.pdf, S. Pedersen, K. Sällvik (Eds.).
9. da Silva V.P., van der Werf H.M.G., Soares S.R., Corson M.S. Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: an LCA approach. J. Environ. Manage 2014, 133:222-231.
10. de Boer I.J.M., Hoving I.E., Vellinga T.V., Van de Ven G.W.J., Leffelaar P.A., Gerber P.J. Assessing environmental impacts associated with freshwater consumption along the life cycle of animal products: the case of Dutch milk production in Noord-Brabant. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:193-203.
11. de Vries M., De Boer I.J.M. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest. Sci 2010, 128:1-11.
12. De Meester B., Dewulf J., Verbeke S., Janssens A., Van Langenhove H. Exergetic life-cycle assessment (ELCA) for resource consumption evaluation in the built environment. Build. Environ 2009, 44:11-17.
13. De Meester S., Callewaert C., De Mol E., Van Langenhove H., Dewulf J. The resource footprint of biobased products: a key issue in the sustainable development of biorefineries. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2011, 5:570-580.
14. Derden A., Meynaerts E., Vercaemst P., Vrancken K. Best Beschikbare Technieken (BBT) voor de veeteeltsector 2005, Academia Press, Gent. http://www.emis.vito.be/bbt-voor-de-sector-veeteelt.
15. Dewulf J., Van Langenhove H., Mulder J., van den Berg M.M.D., van der Kooi H.J., Arons J.D. Illustrations towards quantifying the sustainability of technology. Green Chem 2000, 2:108-114.
16. Dewulf J., Van Langenhove H., van de Velde B. Exergy-based efficiency and renewability assessment of biofuel production. Environ. Sci. Technol 2005, 39:3878-3882.
17. Dewulf J., Bösch M.E., De Meester B., Van der Vorst G., Van Langenhove H., Hellweg S., et al. Cumulative Exergy Extraction from the Natural Environment (CEENE): a comprehensive Life Cycle Impact Assessment method for resource accounting. Environ. Sci. Technol 2007, 41:8477-8483.
18. Dewulf J., Van der Vorst G., Aelterman W., De Witte B., Vanbaelen H., Van Langenhove H. Integral resource management by exergy analysis for the selection of a separation process in the pharmaceutical industry. Green Chem 2007, 9:785-791.
19. Dewulf J., Van Langenhove H., Muys B., Bruers S., Bakshi B.R., Grubb G.F., et al. Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol 2008, 42:2221-2232.
20. Diaz M.C., Van Amburgh M.E., Smith J.M., Kelsey J.M., Hutten E.L. Composition of growth of holstein calves fed milk replacer from birth to 105-kilogram body weight. J. Dairy Sci 2001, 84:830-842.
21. Dijk J., Huizing H.J., de Vries C., Boone L.J. An investigation into Novel Concepts to remove GHG Methane from Dairy Stable Ventilation Air at ultra-low concentrations by the use of Methanotrophic bacteria accessed 25.01.14. http://www.courage2025.nl/download/382/downloads/Methaan_rapport_juli_2012.pdf.
22. DSM Nutritional Products NV Qualifeed database accessed 25.11.13. http://www.qualifeed.be.
23. ECN Phyllis 2. Database for biomass and waste. Energy research Centre of the Netherlands accessed 06.01.14. http://www.ecn.nl/phyllis2.
24. European Commission A resource-efficient Europe - flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 strategy Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0021:FIN:EN:PDF.
25. FAO Small-Scale Dairy Farming Manual 1993, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/t1265e/t1265e.htm.
26. FAO World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. Summary Report 2002, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y3557e/y3557e00.htm.
27. FAO Review of World Water Resources by Country. Water Report No. 23 2003, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. ftp://ftp.fao.org/agl/aglw/docs/wr23e.pdf.
28. FAO Livestock's Long Shadow - Environmental Issues and Options 2006, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM.
29. FAO Save and Grow. A Policymaker's Guide to the Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder Crop Production 2011, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2215e/i2215e.pdf.
30. FAO Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock - a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities 2013, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3437e/i3437e.pdf.
31. FAO The Use of Concentrate Feeds in Livestock Production Systems 2014, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/Refer/fcrpsec1.pdf.
32. Frischknecht R., Jungbluth N., Althaus H.J., Bauer C., Doka G., Dones R., et al. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods Ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.0. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf. http://www.ecoinvent.ch.
33. Global Footprint Network Annual Report. With no Ecological Bank Statement, Nations Spend Blindly 2012, Global Footprint Network, Geneva. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/article_uploads/2012_Annual_Report.pdf.
34. Goessens I. Veel verse mest nodig voor pocketvergister Innovatiesteunpunt. Boerenbond Management & Techniek 1, accessed 22.02.14. http://www.innovatiesteunpunt.be/Portals/17/Energie%20en%20Water/thematisch/Artikel%20pochetvergisting%202012%20januari.pdf.
35. Goessens I. Pocketvergisting, de motor van het Waterhof Innovatiesteunpunt. http://www.biogas-labo.be/nl/workshop-omzetting-van-biomassa-naar-energie-vlaams-brabant.
36. Guinée J.B., Gorrée M., Heijungs R., Huppes G., Kleijn R., de Koning A., et al. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. Operational Guide to the ISO Standards 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
37. Heller M.C., Keoleian G.A., Willett W.C. Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol 2013, 47:12632-12647.
38. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K., Aldaya M.M., Mekonnen M.M. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard 2011, Earthscan, London. http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/WaterFootprintAssessmentManual.
39. IDF A Common Carbon Footprint Approach for Dairy. The IDF Guide to Standard Lifecycle Assessment Methodology for the Dairy Sector 2010, International Dairy Federation.
40. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme 2006, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan, on behalf of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe (Eds.).
41. IPCC Climate change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung (Eds.).
42. ISO ISO 14040: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework 2006, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
43. ISO ISO 14044: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines 2006, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
44. Journée M., Bertrand C. Improving the spatio-temporal distribution of surface solar radiation data by merging ground and satellite measurements. Remote Sens. Environ 2010, 114:2692-2704.
45. Kotas T.J. The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis 1985, Butterworths, London.
46. Lorenz A.J., Gustafson T.J., Coors J.G., de Leon N. Breeding maize for a bioeconomy: a literature survey examining harvest index and stover yield and their relationship to grain yield. Crop Sci 2010, 50:1-12.
47. Machmuller A. Medium-chain fatty acids and their potential to reduce methanogenesis in domestic ruminants. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 2006, 112:107-114.
48. Meier T., Christen O. Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. Environ. Sci. Technol 2013, 47:877-888.
49. Meul M., Nevens F., Reheul D., Hofman G. Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 2007, 119:135-144.
50. Morris D.R., Szargut J. Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet Earth. Energy 1986, 11:733-755.
51. Novozymes Comparative life cycle assessment of malt-based beer and 100% barley beer accessed 25.03.14. http://www.novozymes.com/en/sustainability/Published-LCA-studies/Documents/Comparative%20LCA%20of%20malt%20based%20and%20barley%20based%20beer%20-%20Full%20report.pdf.
52. O'Brien D., Shalloo L., Patton J., Buckley F., Grainger C., Wallace M. A life cycle assessment of seasonal grass-based and confinement dairy farms. Agric. Syst 2012, 107:33-46.
53. Productschap Diervoeder CVB Veevoedertabel. Chemische samenstellingen en nutritionele waarden van voedermiddelen 2007, Productschap Diervoeder, Den Haag.
54. Remmelink G., Blanken K., van Middelkoop J., Ouweltjes W., Wemmenhove H. Handboek melkveehouderij 2013, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Lelystad. http://www.handboekmelkveehouderij.nl.
55. Renouf M.A., Pagan R.J., Wegener M.K. Life cycle assessment of Australian sugarcane products with a focus on cane processing. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2011, 16:125-137.
56. Sebek L.B.J., Temme E.H.M. De humane eiwitbehoefte en eiwitconsumptie en de omzetting van plantaardig eiwit naar dierlijk eiwit. Rapport 232 2009, Wageningen UR Animal Sciences Group, Lelystad. http://edepot.wur.nl/8187.
57. SERI, GLOBAL 2000 and Friends of the Earth Europe Overconsumption? Our use of the world's natural resources accessed 16.12.13. http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2009/Overconsumption_Sep09.pdf.
58. Staerfl S.M., Zeitz J.O., Kreuzer M., Soliva C.R. Methane conversion rate of bulls fattened on grass or maize silage as compared with the IPCC default values, and the long-term methane mitigation efficiency of adding acacia tannin, garlic, maca and lupine. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 2012, 148:111-120.
59. Sultana M.N., Uddin M.M., Ridoutt B.G., Peters K.J. Comparison of water use in global milk production for different typical farms. Agric. Syst 2014, 129:9-21.
60. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories Ecoinvent database v2.2 accessed 25.03.14. http://www.ecoinvent.org/.
61. Szargut J. Exergy Method: Technical and Ecological Applications. Series: developments in Heat Transfer 2005, vol. 18. WIT Press, Southampton.
62. Szargut J., Morris D.R., Steward F.R. Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes 1988, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Berlin.
63. van Zeist W.J., Marinussen M., Broekema R., Groen E., Kool A., Dolman M., et al. LCI Data for the Calculation Tool Feedprint for Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Feed Production and Utilization - Crushing Industry 2012, Wageningen UR Livestock Research and Blonk Consultants, Lelystad/Gouda, The Netherlands. http://blonkconsultants.nl/publicaties/2013/carbon-footprint-diervoeder.html.
64. van Zeist W.J., Marinussen M., Broekema R., Groen E., Kool A., Dolman M., et al. LCI Data for the Calculation Tool Feedprint for Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Feed Production and Utilization - Sugar Industry 2012, Wageningen UR Livestock Research and Blonk Consultants, Lelystad/Gouda, The Netherlands. http://blonkconsultants.nl/publicaties/2013/carbon-footprint-diervoeder.html.
65. van Zeist W.J., Marinussen M., Broekema R., Groen E., Kool A., Dolman M., et al. LCI Data for the Calculation tool Feedprint for Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Feed Production and Utilization - Wet Milling Industry 2012, Wageningen UR Livestock Research and Blonk Consultants, Lelystad/Gouda, the Netherlands. http://blonkconsultants.nl/publicaties/2013/carbon-footprint-diervoeder.html.
66. Van der Straeten B., Deuninck J., Van Gijseghem D. De melkproductie in Vlaanderen na 2015 Beleidsdomein Landbouw en Visserij, afdeling Monitoring en Studie, Brussel. http://www.vlaanderen.be/landbouw/studies.
67. Van Horn H.H., Wilkie A.C., Powers W.J., Nordstedt R.A. Components of dairy manure management systems. J. Dairy Sci 1994, 77:2008-2030.
68. Van linden V., Herman L. A fuel consumption model for off-road use of mobile machinery in agriculture. Energy 2014, 77:880-889.
69. Vanham D., Mekonnen M., Hoekstra A. The water footprint of the EU for different diets. Ecol. Indic 2013, 32:1-8.
70. Vigne M., Vayssières J., Lecomte P., Peyraud J.L. Pluri-energy analysis of livestock systems - a comparison of dairy systems in different territories. J. Environ. Manage 2013, 126:44-54.
71. VMM Waterwegwijzer voor veehouders Een handleiding voor duurzaam watergebruik in en om de veehouderij. Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij. http://www.meetjesland.be/Sterk_met_melk/Waterwegwijzer%20voor%20veehouders.pdf.
72. VMM Water. Elke druppel telt. Melkveehouderij Tips om duurzaam met water om te gaan op een melkveebedrijf. Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij Afdeling Water, Brussel. http://www.vlaanderen.be/nl/publicaties/detail/water-elke-druppel-telt-melkveehouderij.
73. Wageningen UR Handboek snijmaïs 2013, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Lelystad. http://edepot.wur.nl/293693.
74. Wall, G., 1977. Exergy - a useful concept within resource accounting. Report no. 77-42, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.
75. Williams S.R.O., Fisher P.D., Berrisford T., Moate P.J., Reynard K. Reducing methane on-farm by feeding diets high in fat may not always reduce life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2014, 19:69-78.
76. Zhu X.G., Long S.P., Ort D.R. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol 2010, 61:235-261.