Engineered composite tissue as a bioartificial limb graft

Biomaterials

Volumn 61, Issue , 2015, Pages 246-256

  Jank, Bernhard J ^a,b   Xiong, Linjie ^a   Moser, Philipp T ^a,b   Guyette, Jacques P ^a,b   Ren, Xi ^a,b   Cetrulo, Curtis L ^a,b   Leonard, David A ^a,b   Fernandez, Leopoldo ^a   Fagan, Shawn P ^b   Ott, Harald C ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioprosthesis; Bone graft; Mechanical properties; Muscle

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MUSCLE;

ACELLULAR SCAFFOLDS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BONE GRAFT; COMPOSITE ARCHITECTURES; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; NATIVE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; PERFUSION BIOREACTOR; PHYSIOLOGIC FUNCTION;

GRAFTS;

DETERGENT;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOARTIFICIAL LIMB GRAFT; BIOARTIFICIAL ORGAN; COMPOSITE GRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FORCE; GRAFT PATENCY; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; ORTHOTOPIC TRANSPLANTATION; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FREE SYSTEM; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; DEVICES; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIMB PROSTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STEM CELL; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

PRIMATES; RATTUS;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL-FREE SYSTEM; CELLS, CULTURED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STEM CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84936875479     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.051     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ziegler-Graham K., MacKenzie E.J., Ephraim P.L., Travison T.G., Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch. Phys. Med. rehabil. 2008, 89:422.
2. Kejlaa G.H. The social and economic outcome after upper limb amputation. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 1992, 16:25.
3. Fitzpatrick M.C. The psychologic assessment and psychosocial recovery of the patient with an amputation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999, 98.
4. Parkes C.M. Reaction to the loss of a limb. Nurs. Mirror Midwives J. 1975, 140:36.
5. Lanzetta M., et al. Hand transplantation: ethics, immunosuppression and indications. J. Hand Surg. Br. 2001, 26:511.
6. Schneeberger S., et al. Achievements and challenges in composite tissue allotransplantation. Transpl. Int. off. J. Eur. Soc. Organ Transplant. 2011, 24:760.
7. Pomahac B., Gobble R.M., Schneeberger S. Facial and hand allotransplantation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4.
8. Szajerka T., Klimczak A., Jablecki J. Chimerism in hand transplantation. Ann. Transplant.: Q. Pol. Transplant. Soc. 2011, 16:83.
9. Kaufman C.L., Blair B., Murphy E., Breidenbach W.B. A new option for amputees: transplantation of the hand. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2009, 46:395.
10. Petruzzo P., et al. The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. Transplantation 2010, 90:1590.
11. Shores J.T., Imbriglia J.E., Lee W.P. The current state of hand transplantation. J. Hand Surg. 2011, 36:1862.
12. Mertsching H., et al. Generation and transplantation of an autologous vascularized bioartificial human tissue. Transplantation 2009, 88:203.
13. Raposio E., Caruana G., Bonomini S., Libondi G. A novel and effective strategy for the isolation of adipose-derived stem cells: minimally manipulated adipose-derived stem cells for more rapid and safe stem cell therapy. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. 2014, 133:1406.
14. Aziz A., Sebastian S., Dilworth F.J. The origin and fate of muscle satellite cells. Stem Cell. Rev. 2012, 8:609.
15. Sicari B.M., et al. An acellular biologic scaffold promotes skeletal muscle formation in mice and humans with volumetric muscle loss. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6:234ra58.
16. Ott H.C., et al. Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat. Med. 2010, 16:927.
17. Ott H.C., et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat. Med. 2008, 14:213.
18. Raghavan S.S., et al. Human flexor tendon tissue engineering: decellularization of human flexor tendons reduces immunogenicity in vivo. Tissue Eng. Part A 2012, 18:796.
19. Hudson T.W., et al. Optimized acellular nerve graft is immunologically tolerated and supports regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2004, 10:1641.
20. Woods T., Gratzer P.F. Effectiveness of three extraction techniques in the development of a decellularized bone-anterior cruciate ligament-bone graft. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7339.
21. Mroz T.E., et al. Biomechanical analysis of allograft bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process. Spine J. 2006, 6:34.
22. Flaibani M., et al. Muscle differentiation and myotubes alignment is influenced by micropatterned surfaces and exogenous electrical stimulation. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15:2447.
23. Song J.J., et al. Regeneration and experimental orthotopic transplantation of a bioengineered kidney. Nat. Med. 2013, 19:646.
24. Fox P.M., et al. Decellularized human tendon-bone grafts for composite flexor tendon reconstruction: a cadaveric model of initial mechanical properties. J. hand Surg. 2013, 38:2323.
25. Cheng C.W., Solorio L.D., Alsberg E. Decellularized tissue and cell-derived extracellular matrices as scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32:462.
26. Szynkaruk M., Kemp S.W., Wood M.D., Gordon T., Borschel G.H. Experimental and clinical evidence for use of decellularized nerve allografts in peripheral nerve gap reconstruction. Tissue Eng. Part B, Rev. 2013, 19:83.
27. Borschel G.H., Dennis R.G., Kuzon W.M. Contractile skeletal muscle tissue-engineered on an acellular scaffold. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. 2004, 113:595.
28. Petersen T.H., et al. Tissue-engineered lungs for in vivo implantation. Science 2010, 329:538.
29. Uygun B.E., et al. Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nat. Med. 2010, 16:814.
30. Badylak S.F. Decellularized allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue as a bioscaffold for regenerative medicine: factors that influence the host response. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 42:1517.
31. Guyette J.P., et al. Perfusion decellularization of whole organs. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9:1451.
32. Sjoqvist S., et al. Experimental orthotopic transplantation of a tissue-engineered oesophagus in rats. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3562.
33. Mirmalek-Sani S.H., Sullivan D.C., Zimmerman C., Shupe T.D., Petersen B.E. Immunogenicity of decellularized porcine liver for bioengineered hepatic tissue. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 183:558.
34. Crapo P.M., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3233.
35. Chen Z.L., Yu W.M., Strickland S. Peripheral regeneration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:209.
36. Brandacher G., Gorantla V.S., Lee W.P. Hand allotransplantation. Seminars Plastic Surg. 2010, 24:11.
37. Matsumine H., et al. Vascularized versus nonvascularized island median nerve grafts in the facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery of rats for facial nerve reconstruction study. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2014, 30:127.
38. Zhu Y., et al. Vascularized versus nonvascularized facial nerve grafts using a new rabbit model. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. 2015, 135:331e.
39. Tedesco F.S., et al. Transplantation of genetically corrected human iPSC-derived progenitors in mice with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4:140ra89.