Going with, then against the flow: Evidence against the optomotor hypothesis of fish rheotaxis

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 107, Issue , 2015, Pages 7-17

  Bak Coleman, Joseph ^a   Smith, Derek ^b   Coombs, Sheryl ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Danio rerio; Optic flow; Optomotor response; Rheotaxis; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

COLLISION AVOIDANCE; CYPRINID; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MOVEMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RHEOTAXIS; VISUAL CUE;

DANIO RERIO; HEXAPODA;

EID: 84936861348     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ahrens M.B., Li J.M., Orger M.B., Robson D.N., Schier A.F., Engert F., et al. Brain-wide neuronal dynamics during motor adaptation in zebrafish. Nature 2012, 485(7399):471-477.
2. Arnold G.P. Rheotropism in fishes. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1974, 49(4):515-576.
3. Bak-Coleman J., Coombs S. Sedentary behavior as a factor in determining lateral line contributions to rheotaxis. Journal of Experimental Biology 2014, 217(13):2338-2347.
4. Bak-Coleman J., Court A., Paley D.A., Coombs S. The spatiotemporal dynamics of rheotactic behavior depends on flow speed and available sensory information. Journal of Experimental Biology 2013, 216(21):4011-4024.
5. Baker C.F., Montgomery J.C., Dennis T.E. The sensory basis of olfactory search behavior in banded kokopu (Galaxias fasciatus). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 2002, 188(553):560.
6. Bell C., Bodznick D., Montgomery J., Bastian J. The generation and subtraction of sensory expectations within cerebellum-like structures. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 1997, 50(Suppl.1):17-31.
7. Branchek T. The development of photoreceptors in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. II. Function. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1984, 224:116-122.
8. Bruggeman H., Zosh W., Warren W.H. Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation. Current Biology 2007, 17(23):2035-2040.
9. Clausen R.G. Orientation in fresh water fishes. Ecology 1931, 12(3):541-546.
10. Clausen R. Oxygen consumption in fresh water fishes. Ecology 1936, 17:216-226.
11. Collett T., Nalbach H.O., Wagner H. Visual stabilization in arthropods. Reviews of Oculomotor Research 1993, 5:239-263.
12. Cullen K.E. Sensory signals during active versus passive movement. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004, 14(6):698-706.
13. David C. Mechanisms of directional flight in wind. Mechanisms in insect olfaction 1986, 49-57. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, C.E.J. Kennedy (Eds.).
14. Duistermars B.J., Care R.A., Frye M.A. Binocular interactions underlying the classic optomotor responses of flying flies. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2012, 6:6.
15. Duistermars B.J., Frye M.A. Multisensory integration for odor tracking by flying drosophila: behavior, circuits and speculation. Communicative & Integrative Biology 2010, 3(1):60-63.
16. Egelhaaf M., Boeddeker N., Kern R., Kurtz R., Lindemann J.P. Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 2012, 6:1-23.
17. Friedrich R.W., Genoud C., Wanner A.A. Analyzing the structure and function of neuronal circuits in zebrafish. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 2013, 7:1-8.
18. Gardiner J.M., Atema J. Sharks need the lateral line to locate odor sources: rheotaxis and eddy chemotaxis. Journal of Experimental Biology 2007, 210(11):1925-1934.
19. Got K. The optomotor equilibrium of the Drosophila navigation system. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 1975, 99(3):187-210.
20. Green A.M., Angelaki D.E. Multisensory integration: resolving sensory ambiguities to build novel representations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20(3):353-360.
21. Harden-Jones H.R. The reaction of fish to moving backgrounds. Journal of Experimental Biology 1963, 40(3):437-446.
22. Imada H., Hoki M., Sehiro Y., Okuyama T., Kurabayashi D., Shlmada A., et al. Coordinated and cohesive movement of two small conspecific fish induced by eliciting simultaneous optomotor response. PLoS One 2010, 5(6):e11248. 10.1371/journal.pone.oo11248.
23. Krauss A., Neumeyer C. Wavelength dependence of the optomotor response in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Vision Research 2003, 43(11):1275-1284.
24. Ledent V. Postembryonic development of the posterior lateral line in zebrafish. Development 2002, 129(3):597-604.
25. Liao J.C., Haehnel M. Physiology of afferent neurons in larval zebrafish provides a functional framework for lateral line somatotopy. Journal of Neurophysiology 2012, 107(10):2615-2623.
26. Lyon E.P. On rheotropism.-I. rheotropism in fishes. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 1909, 12:149-161.
27. Maaswinkel H., Li L. Spatio-temporal frequency characteristics of the optomotor response in zebrafish. Vision Research 2003, 43(1):21-30.
28. Montgomery J.C., Baker C.F., Carton A.G. The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish. Nature 1997, 389:960-963.
29. Montgomery J., Coombs S., Halstead M. Biology of the mechanosensory lateral line in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1995, 5:399-416.
30. Neuhauss S.C., Biehlmaier O., Seeliger M.W., Das T., Kohler K., Harris W.A., et al. Genetic disorders of vision revealed by a behavioral screen of 400 essential loci in zebrafish. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19(19):8603-8615.
31. Olszewski J., Haehnel M., Taguchi M., Liao J.C. Zebrafish larvae exhibit rheotaxis and can escape a continuous suction source using their lateral line. PLoS One 2012, 7(5):e36661.
32. Orger M.B., Baier H. Channeling of red and green cone inputs to the zebrafish optomotor response. Visual Neuroscience 2005, 22(3):275-281.
33. Orger M.B., Smear M.C., Anstis S.M., Baier H. Perception of Fourier and non-Fourier motion by larval zebrafish. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(11):1128-1133.
34. Parichy D.M., Elizondo M.R., Mills M.G., Gordon T.N., Engeszer R.E. Normal table of postembryonic zebrafish development: staging by externally visible anatomy of the living fish. Developmental Dynamics 2009, 238(12):2975-3015.
35. Portugues R., Engert F. Adaptive locomotor behavior in larval zebrafish. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2011, 5:1-11.
36. Robertson G., McGee C., Dumbarton T., Croll R., Smith F. Development of the swimbladder and its innervation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Journal of Morphology 2007, 268(11):967-985.
37. Rock I., Smith D. The optomotor response and induced motion of the self. Perception 1986, 15(4):497-502.
38. Shaw E., Tucker A. The optomotor reaction of schooling carangid fishes. Animal Behaviour 1965, 13(2):330-337.
39. Srinivasan M.V. Visual control of navigation in insects and its relevance for robotics. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2011, 21(4):535-543.
40. Srinivasan M.V., Poteser M., Kral K. Motion detection in insect orientation and navigation. Vision Research 1999, 39(16):2749-2766.
41. Stewart W.J., Cardenas G.S., McHenry M.J. Zebrafish larvae evade predators by sensing water flow. Journal of Experimental Biology 2013, 216(3):388-398.
42. Stewart W.J., McHenry M.J. Sensing the strike of a predator fish depends on the specific gravity of a prey fish. Journal of Experimental Biology 2010, 213(22):3769-3777.
43. Suli A., Watson G.M., Rubel E.W., Raible D.W. Rheotaxis in larval zebrafish is mediated by lateral line mechanosensory hair cells. PLoS One 2012, 7:e29727.
44. Sumbre G., de Polavieja G.G. The world according to zebrafish: how neural circuits generate behavior. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 2014, 8:1-4.
45. Thorpe J., Morgan R. Periodicity in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. smolt migration. Journal of Fish Biology 1978, 12(6):541-548.
46. Tytler P., Thorpe J.E., Shearer W.M. Ultrasonic tracking of the movements of Atlantic salmon smolts (Salmo salar L.) in the estuaries of two Scottish rivers. Journal of Fish Biology 1978, 12:575-586.
47. Veselov A.E., Kazakov R.V., Sysoyeva M.I., Bahmet I.N. Ontogenesis of rheotactic and optomotor responses of juvenile Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 1998, 168:17-26.
48. Vogel S., LaBarbera M. Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. Bioscience 1978, 28:638-643.
49. Warren W.H., Kay B.A., Zosh W.D., Duchon A.P., Sahuc S. Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(2):213-216.