Global synthesis of drought effects on food legume production

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Daryanto, Stefani ^a   Wang, Lixin ^a   Jacinthe, Pierre André ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; CAJANUS CAJAN; LENS CULINARIS; VIGNA; VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA; VIGNA UNGUICULATA;

CATERING SERVICE; DROUGHT; FABACEAE;

DROUGHTS; FABACEAE; FOOD SUPPLY;

EID: 84936805394     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127401     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Akibode S, Maredia M. Global and Regional Trends in Production, Trade and Consumption of Food Legume Crops. Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics: Michigan State University, 2011.
2. Abate T, Alene AD, Bergvinson D, Shiferaw B, Silim S, Orr A, et al. Tropical Grain Legumes in Africa and South Asia: Knowledge and Opportunities. PO Box 39063, Nairobi, Kenya International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 2012.
3. Bagayoko M, Buerkert A, Lung G, Bationo A, Römheld V. Cereal/legume rotation effects on cereal growth in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa: Soil mineral nitrogen, mycorrhizae and nematodes. Plant and Soil. 2000; 218:103-16.
4. Sainju UM, Whitehead WF, Singh BP. Biculture Legume-Cereal Cover Crops for Enhanced Biomass Yield and Carbon and Nitrogen. Agronomy Journal. 2005; 97:1403-12.
5. Sultani MI, Gill MA, Anwar MM, Athar M. Evaluation of soil physical properties as influenced by various green manuring legumes and phosphorus fertilization under rain fed conditions. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2007; 4(1):109-18.
6. Duranti M. Grain legume proteins and nutraceutical properties. Fitoterapia. 2006; 77:67-82. PMID: 16406359
7. Gowda CLL, Parthasarathy Rao P, Bhagavatula S. Global trends in production and trade of major grain legumes. International Conference on Grain Legumes: Quality Improvement, Value Addition and Trade; February 14-16; Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India: Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development; 2009. p. 282-301.
8. FAO. Definition and classification of commodities: 4. Pulses and derived products 1994. Available: http://www.fao.org/es/faodef/fdef04e.htm. Accessed 24 July 2014.
9. FAOSTAT. Available: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E. Accessed 19 August 2014].
10. Bruinsma J. The Resource Outlook to 2050: By How Much Do Land, Water and Crop Yields Need to Increase by 2050? Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2009 24-26 June. Report No.
11. Price GD, Howitt SM. Plant science: Towards turbocharged photosynthesis. Nature. 2014. 10.1038/nature13749.
12. Postel SL. Entering an Era of Water Scarcity: The Challenges Ahead. Ecological Applications. 2000; 10(4):941-8.
13. Reddy RR, Reddy SR. Scheduling irrigation for peanuts with variable amounts of available water Agricultural Water Management. 1993; 23:1-9.
14. Olensen JE, Trnka M, Kersebaum KC, Skjelvåg AO, Seguin B, Peltonen-Sainio P, et al. Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. European Journal of Agronomy. 2011; 34:96-112.
15. Pandey RK, Herrera WAT, Pendleton JW. Drought response of grain legumes under irrigation gradient: 1. Yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal. 1984; 76(4):549-53.
16. Peterson PR, Sheaffer CC, Hall MH. Drought effects on perennial forage legume yield and quality. Agronomy Journal 1992; 84(5):774-9.
17. Karou M, Oweis T. Water and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management. 2012; 107:94-103.
18. Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh A, Bahramnejad B, Struik PC, Sohrabi E. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2010; 4(8):580-5.
19. Oya T, Nepomucemo AL, Neumaier N, Farias JRB, Tobita S, Ito O. Drought tolerance characteristics of Brazilian soybean cultivars: Evaluation and characterization of drought tolerance of various Brazilian soybean cultivars in the field. Plant Production Science. 2004; 7(2):129-37.
20. Li F, Cook S, Geballe GT, Burch WR Jr. Rainwater Harvesting Agriculture: An Integrated System for Water Management on RainfedLand in China's Semiarid Areas. Ambio. 2000; 29(8):477-83. PMID: 11026718
21. Sinha SK. Food Legumes: Distribution, adaptability and biology of yield. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1977. 124 p.
22. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis Version 2.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 2000. 133 p.
23. Rockström J, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Hoff H, Rost S, Gerten D. Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resources Research. 2009; 45:W00A12.
24. Manavalan LP, Guttikonda SK, Tran LSP, Nguyen HT. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2009; 50(7):1260-76. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp082 PMID: 19546148
25. Vadez V, Rao S, Kholova J, Krishnamurthi L, Kashiwagi J, Ratnakumar P, et al. Root research for drought tolerance in legumes: Quo vadis? Journal of Food Legumes. 2008; 21(2):77-85.
26. Nunes C, de Sousa Araujo S, da Silva JM, Fevereiro MDS, da Silva AB. Physiological responses of the legume model Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong to water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2008; 63:289-96.
27. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osorio ML, et al. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany. 2002; 89:907-16. PMID: 12102516
28. Pinheiro C, Chaves MM, Ricardo CP. Alterations in carbon and nitrogen metabolism induced by water deficit in the stems and leaves of Lupinus albus L. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001; 52(358):1063-70. PMID: 11432922
29. Cruz de Carvalho MH, Laffray D, Louguet P. Comparison of the physiological responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna unguiculata cultivars when submitted to drought conditions Environmental and Experimental Botany. 1998; 40(3):197-207.
30. Campos PS, Ramalho JC, Lauriano JA, Silva MJ, Matos MDC. Effects of drought on photosynthetic performance and water relations of four Vigna genotypes Photosynthetica. 1999; 36(1-2):79-87.
31. Amede T, Schubert S. Mechanisms of drought resistance in grain legumes: 1. Osmotic adjustment. Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2003; 26(1):37-46.
32. Tuner NC. Crop Water Deficits: A Decade of Progress Advances in Agronomy. 1986; 39(C):1-51.
33. Streeter JG. Effects of drought on nitrogen fixation in soybean root nodules. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2003; 26:1199-204.
34. Davies WJ, Zhang J. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1991; 42:55-76.
35. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to whole plant. Functional Plant Biology. 2003; 30:239-64.
36. Subbarao GV, Nam NH, Chauhan YS, Johansen C. Osmotic adjustment, water relations and carbohydrate remobilization in pigeonpea under water deficits. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2000; 157:651-9.
37. Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM. Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 1986; 13:329-41.
38. Lodeiro AR, Gonzalez P, Hernandez A, Balague LJ, Favelukes G. Comparison of drought tolerance in nitrogen-fixing and inorganic nitrogen-grown common beans. Plant Science. 2000; 154:31-41. PMID: 10725556
39. Frechilla S, Gonzalez EM, Royuela M, Minchin FR, Aparicio-Tejo PM, Arrese-Igor C. Source of nitrogen nutrition (nitrogen fixation or nitrate assimilation) is a major factor involved in pea response to moderate water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2000; 157:609-17.
40. Antolin MC, Yoller J, Sanchez-Diaz M. Effects of temporary drought on nitrate-fed and nitrogen-fixing alfalfa plants. Plant Science. 1995; 107:159-65.
41. Serraj R, Sinclair TR, Purcell LC. Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1999; 50(331):143-55.
42. 2) fixation by white bean and soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1988; 68:957-67.
43. De Vries JD, Bennett JM, Albrecht LM, Boote KJ. Water relations, nitrogenase activity and root development of three grain legumes in response to soil water deficits. Field Crops Research. 1989; 21:215-26.
44. Beck DP, Wery J, Saxena MC, Ayadi A. Dinitrogen fixation and nitrogen balance in cool-season food legumes. Agronomy Journal. 1991; 83:334-41.
45. Sinclair TR, Purcell LC, Sneller CH. Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends in Plant Science. 2004; 9(2):70-5. PMID: 15102372
46. Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Slinkard AE, Nageswara Rao RC, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS. Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Science. 1995; 14(6):469-523.
47. Sprent JI. Evolution and Diversity of Legume Symbiosis. In: Dilworth MJ, James EK, Sprent JI, editors. Nitrogen Fixing Leguminous Symbiosis, Nitrogen Fixation: Origin, Applications and Research Progress. 7. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2008. p. 1-18.
48. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2009; 29:185-212.
49. Frederick JR, Woolley JT, Hesketh JD, Peters DB. Seed yield and agronomic traits of old and modern soybean cultivars under irrigation and soil water-deficit. Field Crops Research. 1991; 27:71-82.
50. Frederick JR, Camp CR, Bauer PJ. Drought stress effects on branch and mainstem seed yield and yield components of determinate soybean. Crop Science. 2001; 41(3):759-63.
51. Dogan E, Kirnak H, Copur O. Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Research. 2007; 103:154-9.
52. Scoones I, Chihudu C, Chikura S, Jeranyama P, Machaka D, Machanja W, et al. Hazards and Opportunities Farming Livelihoods in Dryland Africa: Lessons from Zimbabwe. London, UK and New Jersey, USA: Zed Books Ltd in association with International Institute for Environment and Development, London; 1996. 267 p.
53. Travlos IS, Karamanos AJ. Effects of soil texture on vegetative growth of tropical legume marama bean (Tylosema esculentum). Journal of Agronomy. 2006; 5(4):609-12.
54. Shein EV, Pachepsky YA. Influence of root density on the critical soil water potential. Plant and Soil. 1995; 171:351-7.
55. Novak V, Havrila J. Method to estimate the critical soil water content of limited availability for plants. Biologia Bratislava. 2006; 61(Suppl. 19):S289-S93.
56. Sponchiado BN, White JW, Castillo JA, Jones PG. Root growth of four common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance in environments with contrasting soil types. Experimental Agriculture. 1989; 25:249-57.
57. Smil V. Nitrogen in crop production: An account of global flows. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 1999; 13(2):647-62.
58. Wang L, D'Odorico P, Evans J, Eldridge D, McCabe M, Caylor K, et al. Dryland ecohydrology and climate change: critical issues and technical advances. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2012; 16:2585-603.