Suppression of methanogenesis for hydrogen production in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells using various antibiotics

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 187, Issue , 2015, Pages 77-83

  Catal, Tunc ^a   Lesnik, Keaton Larson ^b   Liu, Hong ^b  

^a USKUDAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibiotics; Hydrogen; Methanogenesis; Microbial electrolysis cell

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTICS; ELECTROLYSIS; ELECTROLYTIC CELLS; HYDROGEN; METHANE; MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS; REGENERATIVE FUEL CELLS;

HYDROGEN GENERATIONS; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL (MECS); MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELLS; MIXED SPECIES; NEOMYCIN SULFATES; PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY; SINGLE CHAMBERS;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

2 BROMOETHANE SULFONATE; 2 CHLOROETHANE SULFONATE; 8 AZAHYPOXANTHINE DERIVATIVE; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BIOGAS; CARBON DIOXIDE; HYDROGEN; METHANE; NEOMYCIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANTIBIOTICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ELECTROKINESIS; GAS PRODUCTION; HYDROGEN; INHIBITION; METHANOGENESIS; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRENT DENSITY; DRUG EFFECT; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL; MIXED CELL CULTURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BACTERIUM; BIOENERGY; BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; DOSE RESPONSE; DOWN REGULATION; DRUG EFFECTS; ELECTROLYSIS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIOELECTRIC ENERGY SOURCES; BIOREACTORS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DOWN-REGULATION; ELECTROLYSIS; HYDROGEN; METHANE;

EID: 84936801196     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.099     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Argyle J.L., Tumbula D.L., Leigh J.A. Neomycin resistance as a selectable marker in Methanococcus maripaludis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62:4233-4237.
2. Catal T., Kavanagh P., O'Flaherty V., Leech D. Generation of electricity in microbial fuel cells at sub-ambient temperatures. J. Power Sources 2011, 196:2676-2681.
3. Cheng S., Logan B.E. Increasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:4468-4473.
4. Chiu P.C., Lee M. 2-Bromoethanesulfonate affects bacteria in a trichloroethene-dechlorinating culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67:2371-2374.
5. Clauwaert P., Verstraete W. Methanogenesis in membraneless microbial electrolysis cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82:829-836.
6. Croese E., Pereira M.A., Euverink G.J., Stams A.J., Geelhoed J.S. Analysis of the microbial community of the biocathode of a hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cell. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92:1083-1093.
7. Cusick R.D., Ullery M.L., Dempsey B.A., Logan B.E. Electrochemical struvite precipitation from digestate with a fluidized bed cathode microbial electrolysis cell. Water Res. 2014, 54:297-306.
8. Fan Y., Hu H., Liu H. Sustainable power generation in microbial fuel cells using bicarbonate buffer and proton transfer mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:8154-8158.
9. Gunsalus I.C., Sligar S.G. Oxygen reduction by the P450 monooxygenase systems. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1978, 47:1-44.
10. Heidrich E.S., Curtis T.P., Dolfing J. Determination of the internal chemical energy of wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45(2):827-832.
11. Hou Y., Luo H., Liu G., Zhang R., Li J., Fu S. Improved hydrogen production in the microbial electrolysis cell by inhibiting methanogenesis using ultraviolet irradiation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48(17):10482-10488.
12. Hu H., Fan Y., Liu H. Hydrogen production using single-chamber membrane-free microbial electrolysis cells. Water Res. 2008, 42:4172-4178.
13. Hu H., Fan Y., Liu H. Hydrogen production in single-chamber tubular microbial electrolysis cells using non-precious-metal catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:8535-8542.
14. Ivanov I., Ren L., Siegert M., Logan B.E. A quantitative method to evaluate microbial electrolysis cell effectiveness for energy recovery and wastewater treatment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38:13135-13142.
15. Kessel J.A.S.V., Russell J.B. The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1996, 20:205-210.
16. Lallai A., Mura G., Onnis N. The effects of certain antibiotics on biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pig waste slurry. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 82:205-208.
17. Logan B.E., Rabaey K. Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies. Science 2012, 337(6095):686-690.
18. Logan B.E., Oh S.E., Kim I.S., Van Ginkel S. Biological hydrogen production measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:2530-2535.
19. Logan B.E., Call D., Cheng S., Hamelers H.V.M., Sleutels T.H.J.A. Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8630-8640.
20. Lovley D.R., Phillips E.J.P. Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54:1472-1480.
21. Moiseyev A., Solberg B., Kallio A.M.I. The impact of subsidies and carbon pricing on the wood biomass use for energy in the EU. Energy 2014, 76:161-167.
22. Montpart N., Rago L., Baeza J.A., Guisasola A. Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates. Water Res. 2015, 68:601-615.
23. Moore B.C., Leigh J.A. Markerless mutagenesis in Methanococcus maripaludis demonstrates roles for alanine dehydrogenase, alanine racemase, and alanine permease. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187:972-979.
24. Nam J.Y., Logan B.E. Enhanced hydrogen generation using a highly saline catholyte in a two chamber microbial electrolysis cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:15105-15110.
25. Nam J.Y., Tokash J.C., Logan B.E. Comparison of microbial electrolysis cells operated with added voltage or by setting the anode potential. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 36:10550-15556.
26. Nam J.Y., Yates M.D., Zaybak Z., Logan B.E. Examination of protein degradation in continuous flow microbial electrolysis cells treating fermentation wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171:182-186.
27. Rader G.K., Logan B.E. Multi-electrode continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell for biogas production from acetate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:8848-8854.
28. Ribot-Llobet E., Nam J.-Y., Tokash J.C., Guisasola A., Logan B.E. Assessment of four different cathode materials at different initial pHs using unbuffered catholytes in microbial electrolysis cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38:2951-2956.
29. Rozendal R.A., Hamelers H.V.M., Euverink G.J.W., Metz S.J., Buisman C.J.N. Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:1632e40.
30. Rozendal R.A., Hamelers H.V.M., Molenkamp R.J., Buisman C.J.N. Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes. Water Res. 2007, 41:1984-1994.
31. Schmidt O., Horn M.A., Kolb S., Drake H.L. Temperature impacts differentially on the methanogenic food web of cellulose-supplemented peatland soil. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 10.1111/1462-2920.12507.
32. Tice R.C., Kim Y. Methanogenesis control by electrolytic oxygen production in microbial electrolysis cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39:3079-3086.
33. Wang Q., Peng L., Su H. The effect of a buffer function on the semi-continuous anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 139:43-49.
34. Zeppilli M., Villano M., Aulenta F., Lampis S., Vallini G., Majone M. Effect of the anode feeding composition on the performance of a continuous-flow methane-producing microbial electrolysis cell. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2014, 10.1007/s11356-014-3158-3.
35. Zhang Y., Merrill M.D., Logan B.E. The use and optimization of stainless steel mesh cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:12020-12028.