RAPTR-SV: A hybrid method for the detection of structural variants

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 2084-2090

  Bickhart, Derek M ^a   Hutchison, Jana L ^a   Xu, Lingyang ^b   Schnabel, Robert D ^c   Taylor, Jeremy F ^c   Reecy, James M ^d   Schroeder, Steven ^a   Van Tassell, Curt P ^a   Sonstegard, Tad S ^a   Liu, George E ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^d IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE DELETION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMIC STRUCTURAL VARIATION; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE DELETION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84936760378     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv086     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alkan,C. et al. (2009) Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Genet., 41, 1061-1067.
2. Bickhart,D.M. et al. (2012) Copy number variation of individual cattle genomes using next-generation sequencing. Genome Res., 22, 778-790.
3. DePristo,M.A. et al. (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet., 43, 491-498.
4. Durkin,K. et al. (2012) Serial translocation by means of circular intermediates underlies colour sidedness in cattle. Nature, 482, 81-84.
5. Hach,F. et al. (2010) mrsFAST: A cache-oblivious algorithm for short-read mapping. Nat. Methods, 7, 576-577.
6. Hormozdiari,F. et al. (2009) Combinatorial algorithms for structural variation detection in high-throughput sequenced genomes. Genome Res., 19, 1270-1278.
7. Karakoc,E. et al. (2012) Detection of structural variants and indels within exome data. Nat. Methods, 9, 176-178.
8. Korbel,J. et al. (2009) PEMer: A computational framework with simulationbased error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data. Genome Biol., 10, R23.
9. Layer,R.M. et al. (2014) LUMPY: A probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol., 15, R84.
10. Liu,G.E. et al. (2010) Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds. Genome Res., 20, 693-703.
11. Mills,R.E. et al. (2011) Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature, 470, 59-65.
12. Quinlan,A.R. and Hall,I.M. (2010) BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl., 26, 841-842.
13. Rausch,T. et al. (2012) DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics, 28, i333-i339.
14. Vazirani,V. (2001) Approximation Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
15. Wright,D. et al. (2009) Copy number variation in intron 1 of SOX5 causes the pea-comb phenotype in chickens. PLoS Genet., 5, e1000512.
16. Ye,K. et al. (2009) PINDEL: A pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics, 25, 2865-2871.
17. Zhang,L. et al. (2014) Detection of copy number variations and their effects in Chinese bulls. BMC Genomics, 15, 480.
18. Zimin,A.V. et al. (2009) A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol., 10, R42.