In reply

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 314, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 83-84

  Elmore, Joann G ^a   Pepe, Margaret S ^b   Weaver, Donald L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST ATYPIA; BREAST BIOPSY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LETTER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; UNITED STATES; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL;

EID: 84936759993     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.6239     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Knezevich SR, Barnhill RL, Elder DE, et al. Variability in mitotic figures in serial sections of thin melanomas.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(6):1204-1211.
2. Feinstein AR. A bibliography of publications on observer variability. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(8):619-632.
3. Elmore JG, Feinstein AR. A bibliography of publications on observer variability (final installment). J Clin Epidemiol.1992;45(6):567-580.
4. Khazai L, Middleton LP, Goktepe N, Liu BT, Sahin AA. Breast pathology second review identifies clinically significant discrepancies in over 10% of patients.J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(2):192-197.