Efficient structuring of data in big data

Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Data Science and Engineering, ICDSE 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-5

  Kumar, T K Ashwin ^a   Liu, Hong ^a   Thomas, Johnson P ^a  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Data Context; Hadoop; Structured Data; Unstructured data; Usage patterns

Indexed keywords

DATA SCIENCE;

DATA CONTEXTS; HADOOP; STRUCTURED DATA; UNSTRUCTURED DATA; USAGE PATTERNS;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84936753378     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICDSE.2014.6974602     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Gartner, Inc. http://www.gartner.com/
2. Philip A. Bernstein, JayantMadhavan, Erhard Rahm: Generic Schema Matching, Ten Years Later. PVLDB 4(11): pp. 695-701,2011
3. Melnik, S., H. Garcia-Molina, and E. Rahm: Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm and its Application to Schema Matching. Proc. ICDE, pp. 117-128,2002.
4. A H Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Y. Halevy: Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. Proc. WWW, pp. 662673,2002.
5. W. Shen, X. Li, and A. Doan. Constraint-Based Entity Matching. In AAAI, pp. 862-867, 2005.
6. V. Ie Clement, Y. Deville, C. Solnon, Constraint-based graph matching,15th Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP), LNCS, vol. 5732, Springer, pp. 274-288, 2009
7. KatjaNiemann, Hans-Christian Schmitz, MarenScheffel, Martin Wolpers, Usage contexts for Object Similarity: Exploratory Investigations, (http://www.zzine.tv/schmitz/publications/LAK.ll.pdf
8. Stijn van Dongen, Graph Clustering by Flow Simulation, PhD thesis, University ofUtrecht, May 2000. ( http://www.library.uu.nVdigiarchief/dip/diss/1895620/inhoud.htm )
9. Kannan R, On Clusterings: Good, Bad and Spectral, Journal of the ACM, Vol. 51, No.3, May 2004, pp. 497-515.
10. Candillier, L., Jack, K., Fessant, F., Meyer, F.: State-of-the-Art Recommender Systems. In: Chevalier, M. et al. (eds.): Collaborative and Social Information Retrieval and Access-Techniques for Improved User Modeling. Idea Group Publishing, pp. 1-22, 2009
11. BadrulSarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl, ItemBased Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 285-295, 2001
12. J. Ben Schafer, Dan Frankowski, Jon Herlocker and ShiladSen, Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems, The adaptive web, pp. 291-324,2007
13. Michael J. Pazzani and Daniel Billsus, Content-Based Recommendation Systems, The Adaptive Web, pp. 325-341, 2007
14. Lushan Han, Abhay L Kashyap, Tim Finin, James Mayfield, and JohnathanWeese. UMBC-EBIQUITY-CORE: Semantic Textual Similarity Systems. In Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013
15. Apache Hadoop Implementation, https://hadoop.apache.orgjdocs 01-202014]
16. Venu Satuluri, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Duygu Ucar, Markov Clustering of Protein Interaction Networks withImproved Balance and Scalability, Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, pp 247-256, 2010
17. Kronecker Delta, https://en.wikipedia.orgjwikilKronecker-delta