Predictors of treatment with dialysis modalities in observational studies for comparative effectiveness research

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1208-1217

  Kuttykrishnan, Sooraj ^a   Kalantar Zadeh, Kamyar ^b   Arah, Onyebuchi A ^c   Cheung, Alfred K ^d   Brunelli, Steve ^c,e   Heagerty, Patrick J ^f   Katz, Ronit ^a   Molnar, Miklos Z ^g   Nissenson, Allen ^c,e   Ravel, Vanessa ^b   Streja, Elani ^b   Himmelfarb, Jonathan ^a   Mehrotra, Rajnish ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e DAVITA INC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

bias; comparative effectiveness research; end stage renal disease; hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; END STAGE RENAL DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROGNOSIS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; PROGNOSIS; RENAL DIALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84936750483     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv097     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. U. S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2008. 2013
2. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K et al. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 110-118
3. Lacson E, Jr, Xu J, Suri RS et al. Survival with three-times weekly in-center nocturnal versus conventional hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23: 687-695
4. Suri RS, Lindsay RM, Bieber BA et al. A multinational cohort study of incenter daily hemodialysis and patient survival. Kidney Int 2013; 83: 300-307
5. Weinhandl ED, Liu J, Gilbertson DT et al. Survival in daily home hemodialysis and matched thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis patients. J AmSoc Nephrol 2012; 23: 895-904
6. Chertow GM, LevinNW, Beck GJ et al. In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2287-2300
7. RoccoMV, Lockridge RS, Jr, Beck GJ et al. The effects of frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Nocturnal Trial. Kidney Int 2011; 80: 1080-1091
8. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization: Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research, in Medicine Io (ed). Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 2009
9. Lacson E, Jr, Wang W, Lester K et al. Outcomes associated with in-center nocturnal hemodialysis from a large multicenter program. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 220-226
10. Nesrallah GE, Lindsay RM, Cuerden MS et al. Intensive hemodialysis associates with improved survival compared with conventional hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23: 696-705
11. Johansen KL, Zhang R, Huang Y et al. Survival and hospitalization among patients using nocturnal and short daily compared to conventional hemodialysis: a USRDS study. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 984-990
12. Pauly RP, Gill JS, Rose CL et al. Survival among nocturnal home haemodialysis patients compared to kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 2915-2919
13. Chan KE, MadduxFW, Tolkoff-RubinN et al. Early outcomes among those initiating chronic dialysis in the United States. Clin J AmSoc Nephrol 2011; 6: 2642-2649
14. Quinn RR, Hux JE, OliverMJ et al. Selection bias explains apparent differential mortality between dialysis modalities. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 1534-1542
15. Mehrotra R, Story K, Guest S et al. Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States. Perit Dial Int 2012; 32: 322-331
16. Nessim SJ, Bargman JM, Jassal SV et al. The impact of transfer from hemodialysis on peritoneal dialysis technique survival. Perit Dial Int 2015; 35: 297-305
17. Khawar O, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lo WK et al. Is the declining use of longterm peritoneal dialysis justified by outcome data? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 1317-1328
18. Lievense H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lukowsky LR et al. Relationship of body size and initial dialysis modality on subsequent transplantation, mortality and weight gain of ESRD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 3631-3638
19. Rodriguez RA, Sen S, Mehta K et al. Geography matters: relationships among urban residential segregation, dialysis facilities, and patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 493-501
20. Pisoni RL, Arrington CJ, Albert JM et al. Facility hemodialysis vascular access use and mortality in countries participating in DOPPS: an instrumental variable analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: 475-491
21. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K et al. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 97-107
22. Yeates K, Zhu N, Vonesh E et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 3568-3575
23. MarshallMR, HawleyCM, Kerr PG et al. Home hemodialysis and mortality risk in Australian andNewZealand populations. AmJ Kidney Dis 2011; 58: 782-793