Hugo de vries no mendelian?

Annals of Science

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 1985, Pages 189-232

  Meijer, Onno G ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84936332839     PISSN: 00033790     EISSN: 1464505X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00033798500200171     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. R. C. Olby. ‘Mendel no Mendelian?’, History of Science, 17, (1979), 53-72.
2. T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change(Chicago, 1977), p. xii.
3. H. F. Roberts, Plant Hybridization before Mendel(Princeton, 1929), pp. 335-37.
4. G. Mendel, ‘Versuche fiber Pflanzen-Hybriden’, Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereines in Briinn, 4 (1866), Abhandlungen, 3-47.
5. C. Correns, ‘Untersuchungen fiber Xenien bei Zea Mays’, Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft, 17 (1899), 410-17.
6. C. Correns, ‘G. Mendels Regel fiber das Verhalten der Nachkommschaft der Rassenbastarde’, Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft, 18 (1900), 156-458.
7. O. G. Meijer, ‘The essence of Mendel’s discovery’, in V. Orel and A. Matalovéi, Gregor Mendel and the Foundation of Genetics (Brno, 1983), pp. 123-78
8. W. B. Provine, The Origin of Theoretical Population Genetics(Chicago, 1979).
9. C. Stern & E. R. Sherwood, ‘A note on the “three rediscoverers” of Mendelism’, Folia Mendeliana, 13 (1978), 237-40.
10. A. H. Sturtevant, A History of Genetics(New York, 1965), 27.
11. P. W. van der Pas, ‘Hugo de Vries and Gregor Mendel’, Folia Mendeliana, 11 (1979), 3-16.
12. M. Kottler, ‘Hugo de Vries and the Rediscovery of Mendel’s Laws’, Annals of Science, 36 (1979), 517-38
13. M. Campbell, ‘Did de Vries Discover the Law of Segregation Independently?’, Annals of Science, 37 (1980), 639-55
14. F. A. F. C. Went, Hugo de Fries. Mannen en Vrouwen van Beteekenis in Onze Dayen(Haarlem, 1900).
15. I. Jahn, ‘Zur Geschichte der Wiederentdeckung der Mendelschen Gesetze’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller-Universitiit Jena, 7-2/3 (1957-58), 215-27.
16. L. H. Bailey, Plant Breeding(New York, 1904), pp. 155-56.
17. L. H. Bailey, ‘Cross-breeding and hybridizing’, The Rural Library, 1 (1892), 1-44.
18. C. Zirkle, ‘The Role of Liberty Hyde Bailey and Hugo de Vries in the Rediscovery of Mendelism’, Journal of the History of Biology, 1 (1968), 205-18.
19. L. H. Bailey, ‘Strawberries under Glass’, Cornell University Agricultural Bulletin, 134 (1897), 263-68.
20. T. J. Stomps, ‘On the rediscovery of Mendel’s work by Hugo de Vries’, The Journal of Heredity, 45 (1954), 293-94.
21. G. van Iterson, L. E. den Dooren de Jong and A. J. Kluyver, Martinus Willem Beijerinck. His Life and His Work(The Hague, 1940), p. 91.
22. L. Darden, ‘Hugo de Vries’s lecture plates and the discovery of segregation’. Annals of Science, 42 (1985), 233-242.
23. C. Darwin, The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, 2 vols (London, 1868
24. W. O. Focke, Die Pflanzen-Mischlinge. Ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Gewiichse(Berlin, 1881
25. C. Naudin, ‘Nouvelles recherches sur l’hybridité des vrgrtaux’, Nouvelles Archives du Musée d’H istoire Naturelle de Paris, 1 (1865), 25-171
26. M. Wichura, Die Bastardbefruchtung im Pflanzenreich erläiutert an den Bastarden der Weiden(Breslau, 1865).
27. L. Darden, ‘Reasoning in scientific change: Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries and the Discovery of Segregation’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 7 (1976), 127-59
28. L. A. J. Quetelet, L’Anthropométrie(Bruxelles, 1870)
29. F. Galton, Hereditary Genius. An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences (London: 1869)
30. F. Galton, Natural Inheritance(London, 1889).
31. H. Spencer. Principles of Biology. Vol. 1, second edition, pp. 180-83.
32. W. Bateson, Materials for the Study of Variation. Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species (London, 1894)
33. M. W. Beijerinck, ‘Kunnen onze cultuurplanten door cruising vcrbctcrd worden?’ Verslaq Iéan het é, erhandelde op het 35e Landhuishoudkundi.q Con qres, yehouden te Wagteninyen, 1882.
34. P. A. Haaxman, Maatschappij Diligentia. Natuurkundige Voordrachten(‘s Gravenhage, 1899), 63.
35. C. Correns, ‘Gregor Mendels Briefe an Carl N/igeli 1866-73’, Abhandlunoen der mathematisch-physischen Klasse der kfniglichen si-chsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 29 (1905), 165-89.
36. A. Jacquard and J. L. Serre, ‘La grn&ique peut-elle &re quantitative?’, La Recherche, 8 (1978), 590-91.
37. A. Millardet, Note sur l’hybridation sans croisement ou fausse hybridation(Bordeaux and Paris, 1894).
38. C. C. Hurst, ‘Experiments in Hybridisation’, Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, 24 (1900), 90-126
39. W. A. M. de Veer, Leven en Werk van Hugo de Vries(Groningen, 1969), p. 187.
40. T. J. Stomps, ‘Hugo de Vries’ Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft, 53-2 (1936), 85-96
41. Garland A. Allen, Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century(New York, 1975), pp. 10-18
42. A. C. Doyle, The Complete Sherlock Holmes Lono Stories(London, 1891; reprinted 1974), p. 47.