Opinion: Endogenizing culture in sustainability science research and policy

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 27, 2015, Pages 8157-8159

  Caldas, Marcellus M ^a   Sanderson, Matthew R ^b   Mather, Martha ^a   Danielsd, Melinda D ^c   Bergtolde, Jason S ^a   Aistrup, Joseph ^d   Stamm, Jessica L Heier ^a   Haukos, David ^a   Douglas Mankin, Kyle ^e   Sheshukov, Aleksey Y ^f   Lopez Carr, David ^g  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b And Social Work ^*  (United States)

^c STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^d AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^f Sunflower Networking Group   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; ETHNICITY; HUMAN; NOTE; OCCUPATION; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL LEARNING; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; SOCIAL STATUS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CULTURE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLICY; SOCIAL CONDITIONS;

EID: 84936100002     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510010112     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. Kates RW, et al. (2001) Environment and development. Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641-642.
2. Turner BL, 2nd, et al. (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074-8079.
3. Dietz T (2013) Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(10, Suppl 3):14081-14087.
4. Kroeber AL, Kluckhohn C (1952) Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions (Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA), Vol XLVII, No 1.
5. Thompson M, Ellis RJ, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural Theory (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
6. Smith C (2003) Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
7. Boholm A (1998) Comparative studies of risk perception: A review of twenty years of research. J Risk Res 1(2):135-163.
8. Sjoberg L (2000) Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal 20(1):1-11.
9. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A valuebelief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6(2):81-97.
10. Sahlins M (2000) Culture in Practice: Selected Essays (Zone Books, New York).
11. Hays S (1994) Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociol Theory 12(1):57-72.
12. Dimaggio P (1997) Culture and cognition. Annu Rev Sociol 23:263-287.
13. Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Am J Sociol 98(1):1-29.
14. D'Andrade RG (1981) The cultural part of cognition. Cogn Sci 5(3):179-195.
15. Vaisey S (2009) Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. AJS 114(6):1675-1715.
16. Bordieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
17. Patterson O (2014) Making sense of culture. Annu Rev Sociol 40:1-30.
18. Dietz T, Fitzgerald A, Shwom R (2005) Environmental values. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:335-372.
19. Evans TP, Kelley H (2004) Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. J Environ Manage 72(1-2): 57-72.
20. Brulle RJ, Christensen C, Borden RJ (2012) Human behavior and sustainability. Front Ecol Environ 10(3):153-160.
21. Acevedo MF, et al. (2008) Models of natural and human dynamics in forest landscapes: Cross-site and cross-cultural synthesis. Geoforum 39(2):846-866.
22. Moniticino M, Acevedo M, Callicott B, Cogdill T, Lindquist C (2007) Coupled human and natural systems: A multi-agent-based approach. Environ Model Softw 22(5):656-663.
23. Cash DW (2001) In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: Agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Sci Technol Human Values 26(4):431-453.
24. Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(49):19449-19450.
25. KWO (2014) Kansas Water Office 50 Year Vision. Available at: www.kwo.org/50-Year-Vision/50-Year-Vision.htm. Accessed June 9, 2015.
26. McNutt M (2014) The drought you can't see. Science 345(6204):1543.
27. Liu J, et al. (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844):1513-1516.