Clustering of environmental parameters discriminates drought and heat stress bread wheat trials

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1489-1503

  Bouffier, Bruno ^a   Derory, Jeremy ^a   Murigneux, Alain ^a   Reynolds, Matthew ^b   Le Gouis, Jacques ^c  

^a Genetic Resources and Pre breeding ^*  (France)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^c Diversity and Ecophysiology of Cereals   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84935456810     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: 14350645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj14.0452     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. E., P. Silva, and H. Silva. 2002. Wheat growth and physiology. In: B.C. Curtis, S. Rajaram, and H. Gomez Macpherson, editors, Bread wheat: Improvement and production. FAO Plant Production and Protection Series. FAO, Rome. p. 53-89.
2. Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements). FAO, Rome.
3. Amani, I., R.A. Fischer, and M.P. Reynolds. 1996. Canopy temperature depression association with yield of irrigated spring wheat cultivars in a hot climate. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 176(2):119-129. doi:10.1111/j.1439- 037X.1996.tb00454.x
4. Atkinson, N.J., and P.E. Urwin. 2012. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 63(10):3523-3543. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers100
5. Brancourt-Hulmel, M. 1999. Crop diagnosis and probe genotypes for interpreting genotype environment interaction in winter wheat trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99(6):1018-1030. doi:10.1007/s001220051410
6. Brancourt-Hulmel, M., J.B. Denis, and C. Lecomte. 2000. Determining environmental covariates which explain genotype environment interaction in winter wheat through probe genotypes and biadditive factorial regression. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100(2):285-298. doi:10.1007/ s001220050038
7. Braun, H.L., G. Atlin, and T. Payne. 2010. Multi-location testing as a tool to identify plant response to global climate change. In: M.P. Reynolds, editor, Climate change and crop production. CABI Climate Change Series. CABI, Cambridge, MA. p. 115-138.
8. Brisson, N., P. Gate, D. Gouache, G. Charmet, F.-X. Oury, and F. Huard. 2010. Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Res. 119(1):201-212. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.012
9. Butler, D.G., B.R. Cullis, A.R. Gilmour, and B.J. Gogel. 2009. ASReml-R reference manual. Queensland Dep. of Primary Industries, Queensland, Australia.
10. Campbell, B.T., P.S. Baenziger, K.M. Eskridge, H. Budak, N.A. Streck, A. Weiss et al. 2004. Using environmental covariates to explain genotype × environment and QTL × environment interactions for agronomic traits on chromosome 3A of wheat. Crop Sci. 44:620-627. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.6200
11. Chapman, S.C. 2007. Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10681- 007-9623-z (accessed 8 Jan. 2013). Euphytica 161(1-2):195-208.
12. Chapman, S.C., M. Cooper, G.L. Hammer, and D.G. Butler. 2000. Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 51(2):209-222. doi:10.1071/AR99021
13. Cooper, G.L., and P.N. Fox. 1996. Environmental characterization based on probe and reference genotypes. In: M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer, editors, Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International in association with the International Rice Research Inst. and the Int. Crops Res. Inst. for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. p. 529-547.
14. Dagnelie, P. 2012. Les experiences en blocs aleatoires incomplets : Experiences non factorielles In: Principes d'experimentations: Planification des experiences et analyse de leurs resultats. Les Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux, Belgique. p. 227-258.
15. Demotes-Mainard, S., G. Doussinault, and J.M. Meynard. 1996. Abnormalities in the male developmental programme of winter wheat induced by climatic stress at meiosis. Agronomie 16(8):505-515. doi:10.1051/ agro:19960804
16. Denis, J.B. 1988. Two way analysis using covariates. Statistics 19(1):123-132. doi:10.1080/02331888808802080
17. Deswarte, J.-C. 2013.Blé: des gelées à la meïoses peuvent affecter la fertilite du pollen. ARVALIS-Infos.fr. http://www.arvalis-infos.fr:80/view- 10280-arvarticle.html (accessed 6 Sept. 2013).
18. Dhillon, S.S., and R. Ortiz-Monasterio. 1993. Effects of date of sowing on the yield and yield components of spring wheat and their relationship with solar radiation and temperature at Ludhiana, Punjab, India. CIMMYT, Mexico DF.
19. FAO. 2014. FAOSTAT. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/ (accepted 3 June 2014).
20. Fischer, R.A. 1985. Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J. Agric. Sci. 105(02):447-461. doi:10.1017/S0021859600056495
21. Gallagher, J.N., and P.V. Biscoe. 1978. Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. J. Agric. Sci. 91(01):47-60. doi:10.1017/ S0021859600056616
22. Gate, P. 1995. Ecophysiologie du blé. Lavoisier-Technique et documentation, Paris.
23. Gaudillere, J.P., and M.O. Barcelo. 1990. Effets des facteurs hydriques et osmotiques sur la croissance des talles de ble. Agronomie 10(5):423-432. doi:10.1051/agro:19900509
24. Gosse, G., C. Varlet-Grancher, R. Bonhomme, M. Chartier, J.-M. Allirand, and G. Lemaire. 1986. Production maximale de matiere seche et rayonnement solaire intercepte par un couvert vegetal. Agronomie 6(1):47-56. doi:10.1051/agro:19860103
25. Husson, F., and J. Josse. 2013. Handling missing values with/in multivariate data analysis (principal component methods). Agrocampus Ouest- Laboratoire de mathematique appliquee, Rennes.
26. Husson, F., J. Josse, S. Le, and J. Mazet. 2013. FactoMineR: Multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining with R. Agrocampus Ouest- Laboratoire de mathematique appliquee, Rennes.
27. Jackson, P., M. Robertson, M. Cooper, and G. Hammer. 1996. The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding; from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Res. 49(1):11-37. doi:10.1016/ S0378-4290(96)01012-X
28. Lacaze, X., and P. Roumet. 2004. Environment characterisation for the interpretation of environmental effect and genotype × environment interaction. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109(8):1632-1640. doi:10.1007/ s00122-004-1786-6
29. Laperche, A., M. Brancourt-Hulmel, E. Heumez, O. Gardet, E. Hanocq, F. Devienne-Barret, and J. Le Gouis. 2007. Using genotype × nitrogen interaction variables to evaluate the QTL involved in wheat tolerance to nitrogen constraints. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115(3):399-415. doi:10.1007/s00122-007-0575-4
30. Laperche, A., J. Le Gouis, E. Hanocq, and M. Brancourt-Hulmel. 2008. Modelling nitrogen stress with probe genotypes to assess genetic parameters and genetic determinism of winter wheat tolerance to nitrogen constraint. Euphytica 161(1-2):259-271. doi:10.1007/ s10681-007-9433-3
31. Lecomte, C. 2005. L'evaluation experimentale des innovations varietales. Proposition d'outils d'analyse de l'interaction genotype-milieu adaptes a la diversite des besoins et des contraintes des acteurs de la filiere semences. INAPG (AgroParisTech), Paris.
32. Lobell, D.B., W. Schlenker, and J. Costa-Roberts. 2011. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science (Washington, DC) 333(6042):616-620. doi:10.1126/science.1204531
33. Lopes, M.S., and M.P. Reynolds. 2010. Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 37(2):147-156. doi:10.1071/ FP09121
34. Maechler, M., P. Rousseeuw, A. Struyf, M. Hubert, and K. Hornik. 2013. Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 1.14.4.
35. Malosetti, M., J.-M. Ribaut, and F.A. van Eeuwijk. 2013. The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: Modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front. Physiol. 4:1-17. doi:10.3389/ fphys.2013.00044
36. Mathews, K.L., M. Malosetti, S. Chapman, L. McIntyre, M. Reynolds, R. Shorter, and F. Eeuwijk. 2008. Multi-environment QTL mixed models for drought stress adaptation in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117(7):1077-1091. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0846-8
37. McMaster, G.S., and W. Wilhelm. 1997. Growing degree-days: One equation, two interpretations. Agric. For. Meteorol. 87(4):291-300. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00027-0
38. Monteith, J.L. 1972. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 9(3):747-766. doi:10.2307/2401901
39. Olivares-Villegas, J.J., M.P. Reynolds, and G.K. McDonald. 2007. Droughtadaptive attributes in the Seri/Babax hexaploid wheat population. Funct. Plant Biol. 34(3):189-203. doi:10.1071/FP06148
40. Pask, A.J.D., J. Pietragalla, D.M. Mullan, and M.P. Reynolds, editors. 2012. Physiological breeding II: A field guide to wheat phenotyping. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.
41. Patterson, H.D., and E.R. Williams. 1976. A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63(1):83-92. doi:10.1093/ biomet/63.1.83
42. Pietragalla, J. 2012. Canopy temperature. In: A.J.D. Pask, J. Pietragalla, D.M. Mullan, and M.P. Reynolds, editors, Physiological breeding II: A field guide to wheat phenotyping. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.
43. Pinto, S., M.P. Reynolds, K.L. Mathews, C.L. McIntyre, J.-J. Olivares- Villegas, and S.C. Chapman. 2010. Heat and drought adaptive QTL in a wheat population designed to minimize confounding agronomic effects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121(6):1001-1021. doi:10.1007/ s00122-010-1351-4
44. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
45. Reynolds, M.P., R. Trethowan, J. Crossa, M. Vargas, and K.D. Sayre. 2004. Erratum to "Physiological factors associated with genotype by environment interaction in wheat.". Field Crops Res. 85(2-3):253-274. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00057-1
46. Sebillotte, M. 1980. An analysis of yield elaboration in wheat. In: E. Hafliger, editor, Wheat technical monograph. CIBA-GEIGY, Basel. p. 25-32.
47. Semenov, M.A., and P.R. Shewry. 2011. Modelling predicts that heat stress, not drought, will increase vulnerability of wheat in Europe. Sci. Rep. Nature Publ. Group. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/ srep00066 (accessed 2 Oct. 2013).
48. Sial, M.A., M.A. Arain, and M. Ahmad. 2000. Genotype x environment interaction on bread wheat grown over multiples sites and years in Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 32(1):85-91.
49. Slafer, G. 2012. Wheat development: Its role in phenotyping and improving crop adaptation. In: M.P. Reynolds, A.J.D. Pask, and D.M. Mullan, editors, Physiological breeding I: Interdisciplinary approaches to improve crop adaptation. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF. p. 109-123.
50. Suzuki, N., R.M. Rivero, V. Shulaev, E. Blumwald, and R. Mittler. 2014. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 203(1):32-43. doi:10.1111/nph.12797
51. Tottman, D.R. 1987. The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 110(2):441-454. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1987.tb03275.x
52. Triboi, E., and J. Ntonga. 1993. Effet de l'azote et du rayonnement sur le developpement des feuilles et de l'epi chez le ble d'hiver : Mise en place de l'appareil foliaire et de la structure de l'epi. Agronomie 13(4):253-265. doi:10.1051/agro:19930402
53. van Eeuwijk, F.A. 1995. Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multienvironment trials: I. An inventory of models. Euphytica 84(1):1-7. doi:10.1007/BF01677551
54. van Eeuwijk, F.A., J.B. Denis, and M.S. Kang. 1996. Incorporating additional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment tables. In: M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch, editors, Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 15-49.
55. van Eeuwijk, F.A., M. Malosetti, X. Yin, P.C. Struik, and P. Stam. 2005. Statistical models for genotype by environment data: From conventional ANOVA models to eco-physiological QTL models. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56(9):883. doi:10.1071/AR05153
56. Verhulst, N., J. Deckers, and B. Govaerts. 2009. Classification of the soil at CIMMYT's experimental station in the Yaqui Valley near Ciudad. Obregon, Sonora, Mexico. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.
57. Voltas, J., H. Lopez-Corcoles, and G. Borras. 2005. Use of biplot analysis and factorial regression for the investigation of superior genotypes in multi-environment trials. Eur. J. Agron. 22(3):309-324. doi:10.1016/j. eja.2004.04.005
58. Wahid, A., S. Gelani, M. Ashraf, and M. Foolad. 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 61(3):199-223. doi:10.1016/j. envexpbot.2007.05.011
59. Yan, W., and L.A. Hunt. 1998. Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield. In: J. Janick, editor, Plant breeding reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK. p. 135-178.
60. Yan, W., and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41:19-25. doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x
61. Yang, W., L. Duan, G. Chen, L. Xiong, and Q. Liu. 2013. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: Accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16(2):180-187. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.005
62. Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang, and C.F. Konzak. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14(6):415-421. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
63. Zheng, B.S., J. Le Gouis, M. Leflon, W.Y. Rong, A. Laperche, and M. Brancourt- Hulmel. 2010. Using probe genotypes to dissect QTL × environment interactions for grain yield components in winter wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121(8):1501-1517. doi:10.1007/s00122-010-1406-6