Construct validity of the canadian occupational performance measure in participants with tendon injury and dupuytren disease

Physical Therapy

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 750-757

  van de Ven Stevens, Lucelle A W ^a   Graff, Maud J L ^a   Peters, Marlijn A M ^a   van der Linde, Harmen ^a   Geurts, Alexander C H ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DUPUYTREN CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TENDON INJURIES; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DUPUYTREN CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TENDON INJURIES;

EID: 84935431244     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130590     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arnould C, Penta M, Thonnard JL. Hand impairments and their relationship with manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:708–714
2. Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33:9-17
3. Jansen CW, Watson MG. Measurement of range of motion of the finger after flexor tendon repair in zone II of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18:411–417
4. Michener SK, Olson AL, Humphrey BA, et al. Relationship among grip strength, functional outcomes, and work performance following hand trauma. Work. 2001;16:209–217
5. Mink van der Molen AB, Ettema AM, Hovius SE. Outcome of hand trauma: the hand injury severity scoring system (HISS) and subsequent impairment and disability. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28:295–299
6. Pettersson K, Wagnsjo P, Hulin E. NeuFlex compared with Sutter prostheses: a blind, prospective, randomised comparison of Silastic metacarpophalangeal joint prostheses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40:284–290
7. Sandqvist G, Johnsson PM, Sturesson AL, et al. Measures and time points relevant for post-surgical follow-up in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:50
8. Wijk U, Wollmark M, Kopylov P, Tägil M. Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint pyrocarbon implants. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:38–43
9. Heras PC, Burke FD, Dias JJ, Bindra R. Outcome measurement in hand surgery: report of a consensus conference. Br J Hand Ther. 2003;8:70–80
10. MacDermid JC. Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:297–312
11. Veehof MM, Sleegers EJA, van Veldhoven NHM, et al. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002;15: 347–354
12. Amadio PC, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, et al. Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:338–346
13. Bucher C, Hume KI. Assessment following hand trauma: a review of some commonly employed methods. Br J Hand Ther. 2002; 7:79–84
14. Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL, et al. The Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Hand/ Arm (POS-Hand/Arm): a new patientbased outcome measure. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29:477–485
15. Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury. 2005;36: 468–476
16. Hoang-Kim A, Pegreffi F, Moroni A, Ladd A. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:253–258
17. McMillan CR, Binhammer PA. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y). 2009; 4:311–318
18. van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, et al. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:151–169
19. van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Spauwen PHM, van der Linde H. Assessment of activities in patients with hand injury: a review of instruments in use. Br J Hand Ther. 2007;12:4-14
20. Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L, Chojnowski A, Larson D. Severity of contracture and self-reported disability in patients with Dupuytren contracture referred for surgery. J Hand Ther. 2011;24:6-10
21. Oltman R, Neises G, Scheible D, et al. ICF components of corresponding outcome measures in flexor tendon rehabilitation: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:139
22. Sameem M, Wood T, Ignacy T, et al. A systematic review of rehabilitation protocols after surgical repair of the extensor tendons in zones V–VIII of the hand. J Hand Ther. 2011;24:365–372
23. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990; 57:82–87
24. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998
25. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001; 14:128–146
26. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608
27. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:575–587
28. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:619–622
29. Adams J, Mullee M, Burridge J, et al. Responsiveness of self-report and therapist-rated upper extremity structural impairment and functional outcome measures in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:274-278
30. Amirfeyz R, Pentlow A, Foote J, Leslie I. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores following carpal tunnel surgery. Int Orthop. 2009;33:181–185
31. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:210-222
32. Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, et al. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18:660–667
33. Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, et al. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:888–894
34. Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Oud TA, et al. Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:517–528
35. Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ. DASH and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29:159–164
36. Horng YS, Lin MC, Feng CT, et al. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:430–436
37. MacDermid JC, Wessel J, Humphrey R, et al. Validity of self-report measures of pain and disability for persons who have undergone arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:524-530
38. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG III, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:537–541
39. Parker DM, Sykes CH. A systematic review of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a clinical practice perspective. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:150-160
40. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, et al. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67:22–30
41. Kjeken I, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Uhlig T. Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with hand osteoarthritis: validity, responsiveness, and feasibility. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:709–715
42. Pettersson K, Wagnsjo P, Hulin E. Replacement of proximal interphalangeal joints with new ceramic arthroplasty: a prospective series of 20 proximal interphalangeal joint replacements. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40:291–296
43. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42
44. Correlation explained (TimeWeb). Available at: http://www.bized.co.uk/. Accessed September 2014
45. International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001
46. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2005
47. Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well- Being and Justice Through Occupation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT ACE; 2007
48. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804
49. Riaz M, Hill C, Khan K, Small JO. Long term outcome of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24:157–160
50. Innes E. Handgrip strength testing: a review of the literature. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46:120–140
51. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:222–226
52. SPSS [computer program]. Armonk, NY: IBM SPSS Inc; 2009
53. Dekkers MK, Nielsen TL. Occupational performance, pain, and global quality of life in women with upper extremity fractures. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:198-209
54. Stamm TA, Cieza A, Machold KP, et al. Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:917–924
55. Wright JG. Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn’t we be asking patients if they are better? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53:549–553
56. Hume MC, Gellman H, McKellop H, Brumfield RH Jr. Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1990;15:240–243.