Using a Theoretical Multimedia Taxonomy Framework

ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing

Volumn 1, Issue , 2001, Pages 6-

  Heller, Rachelle S ^a   Martin, C Dianne ^a   Haneef, Nuzi ^a   Gievska Krliu, Sonja ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer uses in education; Design; evaluation; multimedia; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84935075652     PISSN: 15314278     EISSN: 15314278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/376697.376701     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aleem, T. A. 1997. World Wide Web site. http://www.erols.com/aleem/mediatax.html or http://www. erols.com/aleem/interact.html.
2. Andre, E. et al. 1993. WIP: The automatic synthesis of multimodal presentation. In Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, M. Maybury, Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 75-93.
3. Arens, Y., Miller, L., and Sondheimer, N. 1991. Presentation design using an integrated knowledge base. In Intelligent User Interfaces, J. W. Sullivan and S. W. Tyler, Eds. ACM Press, New York, NY, 241-258.
4. Berinstein, P. 1997. Moving multimedia: Information value in images. Searcher, 40-49.
5. Feiner, S. 1991. An architecture for knowledge-based graphical interfaces. In Intelligent User Interfaces, J. W. Sullivan and S. W. Tyler, Eds. ACM Press, New York, NY, 259-279.
6. Feiner, S. K. and Mckeown, K. R. 1993. Automating the generation of coordinated multimedia explanations. In Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, M. T. Maybury, Ed. Amer. Assn. for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 117-138.
7. Gregg, L. W. and Farnham-Diaggory. 1975. Content and Structure in Learning.
8. Heller, R. S. and Martin, C. D. 1995. A media taxonomy. IEEE MultiMedia 2, 4, 36-45.
9. Heller, R. S. and Martin, C. D. 1998. Multimedia taxonomy for design and evaluation. In Handbook on Multimedia Computing, B. Fruht, Ed. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
10. Jonassen, D. H. 1988. Instructional Design for Microcomputer Courseware. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Jonassen, D. H. 1991. Hypertext as instructional design. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 39, 1, 83-92.
12. Last, D. A. 1998. Effects of prior knowledge and goal strength. In Technology and Teacher Education Annual. 476-479.
13. Maybury, M. T. 1992. Communicative acts for explanation generation. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 37, 2 (Aug.), 135-172.
14. Mayer, R. E. and Sims, V. K. 1994. To whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 86, 3, 389-401.
15. Reeves, T. C. and Harmon, S. W. 1993. Systematic evaluation procedures for instructional hypermedia/multimedia. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the AERA.
16. Reiser, H. and Reiser, B. 1995. Aesthetic consideration unique to interactive multimedia. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 15.
17. Rosenfeld, L. and Morville, P. 1998. Information Architecture for the World Wide Web. O’Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA.
18. Roth, S. F. and Hefley, W. E. 1993. Intelligent multimedia presentation systems: research and principles. In Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, M. T. Maybury, Ed. Amer. Assn. for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 13-58.
19. Tennyson, R. D. 1977. Content structure as a design strategy variable: I content acquisition. ED 137-314.
20. Wu, M. H.-P. and Martin, C. D. 1997. An exploratory study of user media preferences in a public setting. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 6, 1, 3-21.