Reply to Turin et al.: Vibrational theory of olfaction is implausible

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 25, 2015, Pages E3155-

  Block, Eric ^a   Jang, Seogjoo ^b   Matsunami, Hiroaki ^c   Batista, Victor S ^d   Zhuang, Hanyi ^e,f  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^f INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEUTERIUM; ISOTOPE; MUSK; PROTON; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR;

ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HUMAN; LETTER; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMELLING; VIBRATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ODORS; RECEPTORS, ODORANT; SMELL;

EID: 84934991130     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508443112     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Turin L, Gane S, Georganakis D, Maniati K, Skoulakis EMC (2015) Plausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E3154.
2. Block E, et al. (2015) Implausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(21):E2766-E2774.
3. Gane S, et al. (2013) Molecular vibration-sensing component in human olfaction. PLoS ONE 8(1):e55780.
4. Schilling B, Kaiser R, Natsch A, Gautschi M (2010) Investigation of odors in the fragrance industry. Chemoecology 20(2):135-147.