Fusion of waveform LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery for land cover classification

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 108, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Wang, Hongzhou ^a   Glennie, Craig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Full waveform LiDAR; Fusion; Hyperspectral imagery; Voxelization

Indexed keywords

FUSION REACTIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MERGING; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTROSCOPY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ENERGY DISTRIBUTION COEFFICIENT; EXTRACTING FEATURES; FULL-WAVEFORMS; HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERIES; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; PAIRWISE CLASSIFIERS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE CLASSIFIERS; VOXELIZATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

DATA SET; IMAGE PROCESSING; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LIDAR; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 84934904017     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson J.E., Plourde L.C., Martin M.E., Braswell B.H., Smith M.L., Dubayah R.O., Hofton M.A., Blair J.B. Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112(4):1856-1870.
2. Asner G.P., Knapp D.E., Kennedy-Bowdoin T., Jones M.O., Martin R.E., Boardman J., Field C.B. Carnegie airborne observatory: in-flight fusion of hyperspectral imaging and waveform light detection and ranging (wLiDAR) for three-dimensional studies of ecosystems. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2007, 1(1):013536.
3. Asner G.P., Knapp D.E., Boardman J., Green R.O., Kennedy-Bowdoin T., Eastwood M., Martin R.E., Anderson C., Field C.B. Carnegie airborne observatory-2: increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124:454-465.
4. Buddenbaum H., Seeling S., Hill J. Fusion of full-waveform lidar and imaging spectroscopy remote sensing data for characterization of forest stands. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 34(13):4511-4524.
5. Chang Y.W., Lin C.J. Feature ranking using linear SVM. JMLR: Workshop Conf. Proc. 2008, 3:53-64.
6. Crawford M.M., Kumar S., Ricard M.R., Gibeaut J.C., Neuenschwander A. Fusion of airborne polarimetric and interferometric SAR for classification of coastal environments. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1999, 37(3):1306-1315.
7. Dalponte M., Bruzzone L., Gianelle D. Fusion of hyperspectral and lidar remote sensing data for classification of complex forest areas. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46(5):1416-1427.
8. Dinuls R., Erins G., Lorencs A., Mednieks I., Sinica-Sinavskis J. Tree species identification in mixed baltic forest using LiDAR and multispectral data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 2012, 5(2):594-603.
9. Erdody T.L., Moskal L.M. Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(4):725-737.
10. Glennie C. Rigorous 3D error analysis of kinematic scanning LIDAR systems. J. Appl. Geod. 2007, 1(3):147-157.
11. Glennie C.L., Carter W.E., Shrestha R.L., Dietrich W.E. Geodetic imaging with airborne LiDAR: the Earth's surface revealed. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2011, 76:086801.
12. Hermosilla T., Coops N.C., Ruiz L.A., Moskal L.M. Deriving pseudo-vertical waveforms from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Lett. 2014, 5(4):332-341.
13. Hofton M.A., Minster J.B., Blair J.B. Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2000, 38(4):1989-1996.
14. Jolliffe I.T. Principal Component Analysis 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York.
15. Jones T.G., Coops N.C., Sharma T. Assessing the utility of airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data for species distribution mapping in the costal Pacific Northwest, Canada. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 114(12):2841-2852.
16. Jung, J., 2011. Utilization of Full Waveform LiDAR and Hyperspectral Data for Forest Structure Characterization. Ph.D. Thesis, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, University of Purdue, West Lafayette, IN.
17. Kanaev A.V., Daniel B.J., Neumann J.G., Kim A.M., Lee K.R. Object level HSI-LIDAR data fusion for automated detection of difficult targets. Opt. Exp. 2011, 19(21):20916-20929.
18. Kumar S., Ghosh J., Crawford M.M. Best-bases feature extraction algorithms for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39(7):1368-1379.
19. Landgrebe D. Hyperspectral image data analysis. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002, 19(1):17-28.
20. Mallet C., Bretar F. Full-waveform topographic LiDAR: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009, 64(1):1-16.
21. Mallet C., Bretar F., Roux M., Soergel U., Heipke C. Relevance assessment of full-waveform lidar data for urban area classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66(6):S71-S84.
22. Neuenschwander A.L., Magruder L.A., Tyler M. Landcover classification of small-footprint, full-waveform lidar data. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2009, 3(1):033544.
23. Paris C., Bruzzone L. A three-dimensional model-based approach to the estimation of the tree top height by fusing low-density LiDAR data and very high resolution optical images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2015, 53(1):467-480.
24. Parrish C.E., Rogers J.N., Calder B.R. Assessment of waveform features for LiDAR uncertainty modeling in a costal salt marsh environment. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2013, 11(2):569-573.
25. Ranjani W.K., Sorin C.P., Rusty A.F. Fusion of lidar and multispectral data to quantify salt marsh carbon stocks. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 154:345-357.
26. Sanchez A., V.D. Advanced support vector machines and kernel methods. Neurocomputing 2003, 55(1-2):5-20.
27. Sarrazin M.J.D., Van Adart J., Asner G.P., McGlinchy J., Messinger D.W., Wu J. Fusing small-footprint waveform LiDAR and hyperspectral data for canopy-level species classification and herbaceous biomass modeling in savanna ecosystems. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 37(6):653-665.
28. Schaer P., Skaloud J., Landtwing S., Legat K. Accuracy estimation for laser point cloud including scanning geometry. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci 2007, XXXVI(5/C55). on CD-ROM.
29. Skaloud J., Lichti D. Rigorous approach to bore-sight self-calibration in airborne laser scanning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2006, 61(1):47-59.
30. Tolt G., Larsson H. Waveform analysis of lidar data for targets in cluttered environments. Proc. SPIE 6739, Opt. Remote Sens., Detect., Photon. Technol. Their Appl. 2007, 67390A.
31. Ververidis D., Kotropoulos C. Fast and accurate sequential floating forward feature selection with the Bayes classifier applied to speech emotion recognition. Signal Process. 2008, 88(12):2956-2970.
32. Wang, H., Glennie, C., Prasad, S., 2013. Voxelization of full waveform LiDAR data for fusion with Hyperspectral Imagery. In: Proc. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2013 IEEE International, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 3407-3410.
33. Wu J., Van Aadrt J., McGlinchy J., Asner G.P. A robust signal processing chain for small-footprint waveform LiDAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(8). 3242-2315.