Erratum to: Evaluating the PRASE patient safety intervention - a multi-centre, cluster trial with a qualitative process evaluation: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [Trials 15, (2014) (420)], DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-420;Evaluating the PRASE patient safety intervention - a multi-centre, cluster trial with a qualitative process evaluation: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Sheard, Laura ^a   O'Hara, Jane ^a   Armitage, Gerry ^a,c   Wright, John ^a   Cocks, Kim ^d   McEachan, Rosemary ^a   Watt, Ian ^d   Lawton, Rebecca ^a,b   Brown, J Julia ^e   Din, Ikhlaq ^e   Marsh, Claire ^e   Moore, Sally ^e   Reynolds, Caroline ^e  

^a BRADFORD ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Medical error; Patient participation; Patient safety; Safety management

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; HOSPITAL; MEDICAL ERROR; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SAFETY; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ENGLAND; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENTS; PERCEPTION; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84934762701     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1655-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, Hebert L, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt H: The nature of adverse events in hospitalised patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study ll. N Engl J Med 1991, 324:377-384. 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605.
2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt HH: Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalised patients: results of the Harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med 1991, 324:370-376. 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604.
3. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M: Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. Br Med J 2001, 322:517-519. 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517.
4. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA: The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008, 17:216-223. 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.
5. Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R, Van Der Schaaf T, Sherman H, Lewalle P: Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Health Care 2009,21(1):18-26. 10.1093/intqhc/mzn057.
6. Landrigan C, Parry G, Bones C, Hackbarth AD, Goldmann DA, Sharek PJ: Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:2124-2134. 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404.
7. Department of Health: A Mandate from the government to the NHS Commissioning Board: April 2013 to March 2015. London: Department of Health; 2012.
8. World Health Organization: World Alliance for Patient Safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
9. Department of Health: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: The Stationery Office; 2010.
10. Darzi LPA: High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review; Final Report. London: Department of Health; 2008.
11. Francis R: Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013.
12. Keogh B: Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: overview report. London: Department of Health; 2013.
13. National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England: A Promise to Learn - A Commitment to Act. Improving the Safety of Patients in England. London: Department of Health; 2013.
14. Ward JK, Armitage G: Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Safe 2012, 21:685-699. 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000213.
15. Waterman AD, Gallagher TH, Garbutt J, Waterman BM, Fraser V, Burroughs TE: Brief report: Hospitalized patients' attitudes about and participation in error prevention. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21:367-370. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00385.x.
16. Entwistle VA, Mello MM, Brennan TA: Advising patients about patient safety: current initiatives risk shifting responsibility. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005, 31:483-494.
17. Hall J, Peat M, Birks Y, Golder S, Entwistle V, Gilbody S, Mansell P, McCaughan D, Sheldon T, Watt I, Williams B, Wright J, on behalf of the PIPS Group, Entwistle: Effectiveness of interventions designed to promote patient involvement to enhance safety: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19:1-7. 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181d1391c.
18. Vincent CA, Coulter A: Patient safety: what about the patient? Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11:76-80. 10.1136/qhc.11.1.76.
19. Davis RE, Jacklin R, Sevladis N, Vincent CA: Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement? Health Expect 2007, 10:259-267. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.x.
20. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, Sheridan SE, Donaldson L, Pittet D: Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc 2010, 85:53-62. 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248.
21. Reason J: Managing the Risk of Organisational Accidents. Farnham: Ashgate Press; 1997.
22. Hudson PTW, Groeneweg J, Reason JT, Wagenaar WA, van der Meeren RJW, Visser JP: Application of TRIPOD to Measure Latent Errors in North Sea Gas Platforms: Validity of Failure State Profiles. In Proceedings from the First International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment: November 1991; The Hague, The Netherlands. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1991.
23. Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J, Hudson PTW, Reason JT: Promoting safety in the oil industry. Ergonomics 1994, 37:1999-2013. 10.1080/00140139408964963.
24. Department of Health: An Organisation With A Memory. Report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
25. NPSA[ http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/reporting/what-is-a-patient-safety-incident ]
26. Armitage G, Chapman J: Incident reporting: a curate's egg? Int J Care Pathways 2007, 10:92-96.
27. Coulter A: Patient Safety: What role can patients play? Health Expect 2006, 9:205-206. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00405.x.
28. Jorm CM, Dunbar N, Sudano L, Travaglia JF: Should patient safety be more patient centred? Quality and Safety Policy 2009, 33:390-399.
29. Koutantji M, Davis RE, Vincent CA, Coulter A: The patient's role in patient safety: engaging patients, their representatives, and health professionals. Clinical Risk 2005, 11:99-104.
30. Schwappach DLB: Engaging patients as vigilant partners in safety. A systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2010, 67:119-148. 10.1177/1077558709342254.
31. Unruh KT, Pratt W: Patients as actors: the patient's role in detecting, preventing and recovering from medical errors. Int J Med Inform 2006,76(Suppl 1):S236-S244.
32. King A, Daniels J, Lim J, Cochrane DD, Taylor A, Ansermino JM: Time to listen: a review of methods to solicit patient reports of adverse events. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19:148-157. 10.1136/qshc.2008.030114.
33. Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, Epstein AM, David-Kasdan J, Feibelmann S, Annas CL, Ridley N, Kirle L: Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not? Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:100-108. 10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00006.
34. Weingart SN, Price J, Duncombe D, Connor M, Sommer K, Conley KA, Bierer BE, Reid Ponte P: Patient-reported safety and quality of care in outpatient oncology. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007, 33:83-94.
35. Weingart SN, Pagovich O, Sands DZ, Li JM, Aronson MD, Davis RG, Bates DW, Phillips RS: What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents. J Gen Intern Med 2005, 20:830-836. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0180.x.
36. Giles S, Lawton R, Din I, McEachan R: Developing a patient measure of safety (PMOS). BMJ Qual Saf 2013, 22:554-562. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000843.
37. McEachan R, Lawton R, O'Hara J, Armitage G, Giles S, Parveen S, Watt I, Wright J, Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group: Developing a reliable and valid patient measure of safety in hospitals (PMOS): a validation stud. BMJ Qual Saf 2014, 23:565-573. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002312.
38. Ward J, McEachan R, Lawton R, Armitage G, Watt I, Wright J, Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group: Patient involvement in patient safety: protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:130. 10.1186/1472-6963-11-130.
39. Campbell MK, Fayers PM, Grimshaw JM: Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research. Clin Trials 2005, 2:99. 10.1191/1740774505cn071oa.
40. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J, RIPPLE Study Team: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2006, 332:413-416. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
41. Hasson H: Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implement Sci 2010, 5:67. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-67.
42. Aveling E, Martin G, Jiménez García S, Martin L, Herbert G, Armstrong N, Dixon-Woods M, Woolhouse I: Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012, 21:1034-1041. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000944.
43. Alaszewski A: Using Diaries for Social Research. London: Sage; 2006.
44. Lofland J: Analysing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation & Analysis. Wadsworth: Belmont; 1971.
45. Ritchie J, Spencer L: Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In Analyzing Qualitative Data. Edited by: Bryman A, Burgess R. London: Routledge; 1994.
46. Layder D: Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Research. London: Sage; 1998.
47. Hulscher M, Laurant MGH, Grol R: Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care 2003, 12:40-46. 10.1136/qhc.12.1.40.
48. Hasson H, Blomberg S, Dunér A: Fidelity and moderating factors in complex interventions: a case study of a continuum of care program for frail elderly people in health and social care. Implement Sci 2012, 7:23. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-23.
49. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S: A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007, 2:40. 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.
50. Boyce M, Browne J, Greenhalgh J: The experiences of professionals with using information from patient reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of the qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf 2014, 23:508-518. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524.
51. Henderson S: Power imbalance between nurses and patients: a potential inhibitor of partnership in care. J Clin Nurs 2003, 12:501-508. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00757.x.